Talk:Joan Lefkow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. Note: Wikipedia's non-free content use policy almost never permits the use of non-free images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead.

An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

	Chicago Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles related to Chicago.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Lefkow was judge over many controversal cases but Viriditas insists on spreading unfounded libelous and unencyclopedia speculation that Matt Hale is responsible for the killings of Lefkow's family members. Matt Hale has condemned the killings. Viriditas the bully refuses to fix the article or let anyone else fix it too. --Powergrid 14:16, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

"Hale is not the only person to have a grudge with the judge, Kramer said.Daniel Salley, who shot a Chicago police officer in 2001, screamed at Lefkow in court, calling her a "devil worshipper."Salley yelled, "You reap what you have sown, you ungodly, lying (expletive)." Lefkow has also presided over dozens of gun, gang and drug convictions, including some current cases on her schedule this week. She has been under federal protection in the past. The judge has ruled as well on big business cases, like last month's $700,000 trademark ruling against Ty Beanie Babies. Investigators said they will examine all of Lefkow's cases and also pursue other avenues. But for the moment, answers in the whodunit are few." [1]

Aloha. I understand that you are a new user, but you have been asked three separate times to review policy on your talk page (unfortunately you removed two of those comments with edit summaries, Fuck you, you shit-eating asshole and Removing fecal matter). Wikipedia policies are the social glue that make this site function. Please take the time to review these policies and pay particular attention to Policies and Guidelines, Neutral point of view, No personal attacks, and Civility. In response to your latest attack, I have not "spread unfounded libelous and unencyclopedia speculation". I suggest that you refrain from personal attacks and stick to improving the quality of the articles. In reference to the topic at hand, authorities are pursuing all leads at this time. I encourage you to adopt a NPOV and add any cited information to this article (and Matthew F. Hale) so that all views are represented. As an example, I would be especially interested in adding the opinions of Hale's parents to his page. As long as you stick to brief statements of summarized fact and good citations, there shouldn't be any problems. The problem before, was that you were deleting cited information. There is nothing stopping you from adding further information to balance out the article. Thanks for bringing this issue to my attention. --Viriditas | Talk 21:39, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Please add a picture. Redwolf24 08:07, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Near the end of the article a bunch of dates in March are listed, which I presume are in 2005 but I think you should indicate the year to make it more clear, especially when starting a new paragraph. --65.115.107.3 17:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)