User talk:Jmw0000

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Jmw0000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Jayjg (talk) 15:41, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] disambig

You were going about that Kelly Clarkson disambig all wrong. There was already a dab page at Breakaway. I added the Beach Boys link there and moved her song to Breakaway (Kelly Clarkson song). You erased the entire article, and we try to keep the edit histories intact without doing that. Regards, Mike H. That's hot 08:42, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

OK, I just saw, no problem.
I also moved your article to Breakaway (Beach Boys song). Regards, Mike H. That's hot 08:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chomsky

You have added

In future please refrain from adding unsourceable / misleading text to articles. Zleitzen 12 March 2006

Thank you for replying to my post. Please understand that the aim of Wikipedia is to construct established academic encyclopaedia methods. Your additions would not be sufficient within that context, as you have confirmed that the only source is yourself. Given that your statements are contentious, it is only correct that they should be removed until sources have been legitimately referenced.
Your statement concerning Chomsky and China is contentious and potentially misleading to readers when compared to the statement Chomsky makes here
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=90&ItemID=6751
Chomsky quotes the former Director of Foreign Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution, John Steinbruner who said the words“US militarism and aggressiveness will be countered by a coalition of peace-loving states, led by China” Chomsky adds “We have come to a pretty pass when such words are expressed in the most respectable and sober journals. It is also worth noting how deep is the despair of the authors over the state of American democracy. Whether or not the assessment is merited is for activists to determine.”
Therefore Chomsky is merely quoting Steinbruner rather than expressing that opinion himself. Unless there is evidence otherwise then the matter cannot be continued --Zleitzen 20:03, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Vandalism Report

I was working on a paper-I still am-and am reverting edits from user 151.188.16.40. He has appeared to contribute nothing except vandalism. Worse, some of these are undetected, and updated after. He has been blocked several times, and I'm wondering if this IP can be blocked once and for all. J. M. 08:43, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Hello! I would be happy to help with this. Can you give me a link to the article being vandalised in order for me to compare the edits in the history, please? I can also look at the other contributions from this IP address. Regards,  (aeropagitica)  12:08, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nordic Council

Hello. This edit of yours effectively undid a prior edit made by me. Your edit summary simply stated rv. vandalism. This is inappropriate use of both the edit summary and the term vandalism irritates me. I strongly advise you not to use "vandalism" as an epithet, but only refer to an edit as such if it is beyond reasonable doubt that the edit in question does in fact constitute vandalism. I have now restored my prior edit, and will be keeping a watchful eye on that article's talk page to see if you are going to explain your grievances there or post any constructive suggestions for how the article might be improved. BigAdamsky|TALK|EDITS| 13:46, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Commented on prior page. The vandalism came from another author, hence why I went back a few pages. Everything should be settled now.J. M. 07:14, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Phish

First of all, welcome to wikipedia, it looks as if you are new. But if you are not, disregard that. I dont want to get off to a bad start, but, if i may speak candidly, exactly how much of the Phish article did you read. Now, dont get me wrong, i am not trying to criticize. Its just been that in the past, people who have posted an NPOV tag, read only parts of the article, found one or two NPOV statements and freaked out.

Now, you said you were unable to remove the NPOV because you dont know enough about the band or music. But, NPOV can be removed without having any knowledge of the topic you are reading about. For example, take these to statements: "Kevin Garnett, one of the best basketball players in the NBA..." - this is obviously an NPOV statement, so, even if you didnt know a thing about basketball, you could easily remove the NPOV by changing the grammer, such as "Kevin Garnett, an American basketball player in the NBA..."

So, with this example, you dont need to know anything except basic grammer to remove a bulk of the NPOV that is in articles. So, for now i am going to remove the NPOV tag and i encourage you to re-read through the article and remove the small NPOV you may see, or post on the talk page if you are unsure or have questions. Thanks, and let me know if you have any questions.--Gephart 07:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

I've read the article. There's no criticism of Phish. Even on The Beatles or The Beach Boys contain criticism. There's none here. Not one trace. And I like Phish. And there's a ton of irrelevent information to the casual reader, about as much equal to, say, the Brian Wilson page (Which itself is hopelessly POV, and I've changed a few words from "realized" to "believed", etc. because mono mixing is not a "realization" as better than stereo, its an opinion, etc.). Hence, also, fanboy. I wrote on the discussion page.J. M. 07:11, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Coal Black.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Coal Black.JPG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Knightmove.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:Knightmove.GIF. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:06, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Wikipedia:Conservative_notice_board

Hello, I noticed that you identify as a conservative Wikipedian. So I would like to invite you to post any conservative issues you might have over at the new project page, Wikipedia:Conservative_notice_board. Thanks. --Facto 05:49, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Iraq and the War on Terrorism

Wikipedia:WOT has opened its straw poll, and is open to discussion. Rangeley 00:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] question

I saw that you are a conservative Wikipedian. Would you like to join Conservapedia as a editor? Conservapedia is looking for good editors and Admins. Please send me your email if you want to join Conservapedia. If you feel reticient about giving out your email address you can simply create a new account at hotmail and yahoo so you don't risk getting a lot of junk mail. Regional123 02:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Regional123

[edit] Regarding edits to Bruce Johnston

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Jmw0000! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule smileysmile\.net, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 07:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Virginia Tech massacre

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Virginia Tech massacre. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. dcandeto 20:09, 16 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Knightmove.GIF

Hi. When you uploaded Image:Knightmove.GIF, you did not specify complete source and copyright information. Another user subsequently tagged it with {{GFDL-presumed}} and for some time, it has existed on Wikipedia under the assumption that you created the image, and that, just as with all of your text contributions, you agreed to license it under the GFDL. This assumption, however well-meaning, is not legally sufficient and the tag is being phased out. Images using it are being deleted.

This image has been tagged for deletion and will be deleted in one week if adequate copyright information is not provided.

If you, personally, are the author of this content, meaning that you took the photograph yourself or you created the chart yourself (and it does not use any clipart that you did not create), please retag the image with a free image copyright tag that correctly describes your licensing intentions, usually {{GFDL-self}} or {{PD-self}}. Please also make sure if you have not already done so that you write a good description of what the image depicts, when you took the photo, and other important details. This will allow Wikipedia to continue using the image.

If you did not create the image or if it is derived from the copyrighted works of others, please keep in mind that most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others and does not use images unless we know that they have been freely licensed. Any creative work is automatically copyrighted, even if it lacks a copyright notice. Unless the copyright holder has specifically disclaimed their rights to the image and released it under the GFDL or another compatible license, we cannot use it. If you did not create the image, simply do nothing and it will be deleted in a week.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page if I can be of assistance or leave a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions with any questions you may have. Thank you. MER-C 09:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Knightmove.GIF

Hi. When you uploaded Image:Knightmove.GIF, you did not specify complete source and copyright information. Another user subsequently tagged it with {{GFDL-presumed}} and, for some time, it has existed on Wikipedia under the assumption that you created the image and you agreed to license it under the GFDL. This assumption, however well-meaning, is not legally sufficient and the tag is being phased out. Images using it are being deleted.

This image has been tagged for deletion and will be deleted in one week if adequate copyright information is not provided.

If you, personally, are the author of this content, meaning that you took the photograph yourself or you created the chart yourself (and it does not use any clipart that you did not create), please retag the image with a free image copyright tag that correctly describes your licensing intentions, usually {{GFDL-self}} or {{PD-self}}. Please also make sure if you have not already done so that you write a good description of what the image depicts, when you took the photo, and other important details. This will allow Wikipedia to continue using the image.

If you did not create the image or if it is derived from the copyrighted works of others, please keep in mind that most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others and does not use images unless we know that they have been freely licensed. Any creative work is automatically copyrighted, even if it lacks a copyright notice. Unless the copyright holder has specifically disclaimed their rights to the image and released it under the GFDL or another compatible license, we cannot use it. If you did not create the image, and cannot make the image compliant with Wikipedia:Non-free content, simply do nothing and it will be deleted in a week. All other non-free images must follow these rules.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page or leave a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions with any questions you may have. Thank you. Aksibot 06:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)