User talk:Jmlk17/Archive3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

Jmlk17 has no immediately available Internet access and will be taking a wikibreak of indeterminate length.

This user is often only available after about 10-midnight MDT. Please keep this in mind, as sometimes I may be slow in responding to you.

Guitar Hero II

Thanks for the speedy response. That was my first Wiki edit of any measurable significance so I'm still new to the formatting and whatnot. Perhaps another time I'll create a subsection for it, but it's not critical. I should probably register an account first!

Cheers.

24.79.129.94 04:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey no problem, you're very welcome. Don't be discouraged; my revert wasn't meant to drive you away. It took me awhile to get the hang of things around here as well. My only advice is practice, practice, practice! And register an account; you can create new articles, keep track of your edits, have a much more organized talk page, and much more! Jmlk17 04:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

your curiosity

There are a few things which played into me joining Sigma Chi. For one my Uncle is a Sigma Chi. Although my dad was in Tau Kappa Epsilon I felt a stronger bond with sigma chi when I researched it. Another factor is that when I visited the University I attend I stayed at the Sigma Chi house and met many of the brothers before I even became a freshmen. When I rushed in college I didn't check out that many fraternities, but of the ones I saw they didn't seem to fit like Sigma Chi. Ever since my pledging I have read a lot on the history of Sigma Chi and it is very interesting. I hope to get some of it into the article eventually too. Let me know if you have any other questions. Acidskater 07:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Alpha Phi Delta

Hey I was interested in your edits to the APD page. I am a brother and would like to collaborate with you about what should be added and removed, etc. please keep in touch. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Smartbboy (talk • contribs) 22:08, May 17, 2007.

Hey, I'm not sure how to respond, since you have been blocked as a vandal. But the article really needs to be expanded for one, copyedited for another, and just overall re-organized. Jmlk17 21:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Lipmann Kessel

Thanks for the note, your caution was very considerate. I think Lipmann Kessel has some potential, as long as its creator provides decent sourcing. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 09:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Jmlk17 10:11, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

I need all the help I can get Deben Dave 11:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Reverted really I will have a look at that. Deben Dave 21:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

In the UK Army a Brigadier is not a General unlike the USA Army so I am going to take that out hope that is ok but please do not take offence and contiue to help...thanks...Deben Dave 21:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Kid A

Earlier today, you reverted 34 edits made to this article by User:172.135.131.176, apparently without checking them. They were all very constructive edits, which I believe will help the article in its FA candidacy and represent hours of his/her hard work. The user now appears to have vowed to stop editing wikipedia, which I think is a great shame.

I understand that IP vandalism is a serious issue, but there are lots of very capable editors here, who for some reason do not have a user account. In future, please remember that vandalproof is a very powerful tool, and you must check that edits are actually vandalism before reverting them. Thanks - Alex valavanis 10:31, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry. Everyone makes mistakes - that's why we have a revert button! Hopefully, the user will understand and accept this too. It was good of you to apologise to him/her. :) - Alex valavanis 10:38, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do not give up (lol)

Lol, I'm not going anywhere. ;0)

I just saw the nomination and thought I'd give it a go. I'm here forever however (to be editing). ;D LOL There's no "tragedy" in someone not receiving adminship. The reason why I want to become an admin is because I have become quite critic of the poor job done administrating wikipedia, because despite its very large number of admins it obviously keeps lacking them. E.g. I remember 3RR reports rotting to waste without responding (same with RFPPs) and that a lot of reports at the incidents are actually ignored.

Despite Wikipedia's huge number of admins, it's still proportionally unimaginably lower than the necessary quantity (obviously)... but if I don't become an admin (considering the current status of this RfA), I'll be glad for remaining at the *side* which does not have the overly burden on its back. :)))

Cheers, mate. --PaxEquilibrium 10:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Word...I answered further on your page :) Jmlk17 20:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey

Hey Jmlk17, thanks for your note and best wishes. I just got back from Zagreb and have a stinking cold but had a great time. I'm only back in the UK for a week before I have my summer holiday of in Cuba which I'm really looking forward to, if only for some sunshine! I'd like to apologise for my lack of suggestions in recent times, as you are probably aware, I'm only just getting used to the extra buttons following my own successful RFA so I've taken it easy and tried not to ruffle too many feathers. I've had a bit of a scan of your recent contributions, your incredible number of edits over the past few months are indicative of using tools such as VP. A recent, but welcome slant at RFA has been an emphasis on building the encylopaedia. To that end I'd like to recommend that you make a concerted effort to take an article to perhaps good article status, if not featured status. I've noticed you've made over a hundred edits to Pi Kappa Alpha so you're clearly interested in this. Can I suggest you have a look at giving it a peer review to allow others to say where they think the article can be improved (let me know if you start this, I'll happily contribute, although I know little about fraternities, often that would make me an ideal person to proof-read your article, keeping it NPOV, factual, well cited etc) and then make the appropriate changes, and pursue elevation to either GA or FA (the article is in a good state so GA shouldn't be too difficult, but some photos and more prose than lists would be a good thing). Anyway, have a think about that, or, if you have another article you'd be prepared to put the time into then let me know and we'll talk it over... All the best for now... The Rambling Man 17:57, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Moonpop

No problem, I noticed it since I got an edit conflict with you on the author's talkpage. Keep up the good work! - Myanw 10:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Carioca RFA

Thanks for your support on my request for adminship.

The final outcome was (31/4/1), so I am now an administrator. If you have any comments or concerns on my actions as an administrator, please let me know. Thank you! --Carioca 20:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Thanks for the comments you left for me. I understand my mainspace edit total is low, however in the next few months I will be working that. I was trying to "be bold" with the nomination as I do feel I can and will make for a good admin here. Wildthing61476 00:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

I answered further on your talk page. Jmlk17 02:10, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

LOL

I'm a channel flipper, I'm watching Utah/San Antonio as well. Thanks for the compliment. Soxrock 02:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

RfM

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Phi Kappa Psi, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

Re: Wikibreak

Thanks for your support. I did take a Wikibreak from about February '06 or thereabouts until about October or so. I think I just kind of got burned out for a while after making several thousand edits! I also recall feeling tired of all the foolishness—vandalism and silliness—that some people contribute to the Wikipedia. But later I decided that I could still make good contributions not let the stupidity bother me. Actually I did come back in about July or so, contributing anonymously. You can find a record of those edits here. ●DanMS • Talk 00:39, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Stanley Cup leaders

Hey, I understand what you were trying to do. No worries. I'm not sure why the other person had a problem with it being 12 as far as length, 2 lines is not a big difference. V-train 05:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Signature

My signature was just something that I came up with practically at random. Quite a few people have something similar (although some other part of their name links to talk and contribs instead), just with different colors. I just tried a couple shades of red within the 216-color palette for the C and T, and used pure red for the rest. You could do something with the digits in your name, maybe. Just a thought. Comrade Tux 04:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

It might be a good idea to have one of the two links in a slightly different color, so it stands out a little. The default link text color is #002bb8, for reference. Maybe something like #000077 (versus normal)? Comrade Tux 05:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Cool! Jmlk17 05:20, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

No problem. :) Comrade Tux 15:59, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Hi Jmlk17. I'd like to thank you for your support of my RfA. It was closed at surprising 75/0/0, so I'm an admin now. MaxSem 22:06, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

No problem

This is a computer in the Bradford Hilton, England, so warnings will be received by randonm folks!! 84.233.132.92 23:22, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Lol, alright. That happens at times. Jmlk17 23:23, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

sure

and that despite me being known to heatedly disagree with people, which as you can see, has allready got me blocked for a day once. but that wasnt over an animated sitcom.. anyway, your welcome and thanx. ow and "het gelukkige uitgeven" means "the happy publishing", but ah, its close enough:). and really cool, iv never seen any not living here ever try dutch before. same to you · Lygophile has spoken 00:00, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi

Hello thanks for your message. Don't worry i'm not ignoring you - very tired and frustrated, so I need to think up a good response, and I will tomorrow. Btw, I was seriously going to email you and ask if you wanted to be nominated... coincidence or what? :) Majorly (talk | meet) 02:07, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Canvassing was invented around October 2006 to prevent vote stacking on AfDs and such, which will change the consensus. However, people now associate it with RfAs. In the past, users would have banners on their userpage, a special userbox saying they were on RfA, link in the signature, asking users to come and support. And you know what, nobody gave a damn about. Because adminship is NO BIG DEAL. These are the kind of users that make RfA broken, coming up with silly reasoning "he told a friend, cannot possibly be trusted to delete a page". Heck, when I became an admin, I don't believe I'd ever read a policy page properly. And these opposers don't realise that not following a silly guideline doesn't make a bad admin. I totally agree with canvassing - does that make me so terrible? I look at RfA history a lot, and I see a lot of canvassing. These users go on to become some of the greatest users this site has ever had. Now all these users are preventing someone from doing what really is a dull horrible slave job, just because they advertised they wanted to do it. I say encourage it. The backlogs are still high, people still complain RfA is broken, and people still keep opposing for reasons nothing to do with being an admin.</rant> :) Majorly (talk | meet) 19:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Check your inbox. (although you might have second thoughts after reading the rant above hehe) Majorly (talk | meet) 22:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

My Rfa

Hello, Jmlk. Thank you very much for your kind support on my recent Rfa, it succeeded! I feel thrilled and hope to live up to your expectations. If you spot me messing things up, feel free to shout at me :) Best wishes, PeaceNT 06:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh my, of course! Jmlk17 07:00, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. I would sure get back to work shortly. Just feel that I need to thank everyone for being so kind. Have a fabulous day :) See ya! PeaceNT 07:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Hahaha, excellent. Thank you! Jmlk17 07:11, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Phi Kappa Psi. For the Mediation Committee, ^demon[omg plz] This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to open new mediation cases. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

I have agreed to mediate this dispute. Please take a look at the preliminary questions at Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Phi Kappa Psi. Thanks, WjBscribe 02:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

My RFA

Many thanks for your support at my RFA. It ended successfully and I am now a glorified janitor. If I can be of any assistance please don't hesitate to contact me through my talk page. Happy editing! —Ocatecir ^Talk 18:10, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Your comment at my RFA page

I perfectly understand your comment you left at my RFA, and I thank you for the honesty. Its just been quite frustrating trying to work with NE2, and seeing that now I'm avoiding him, it's working and I feel more coolheaded than earlier today. Obviously, I'd ask you to consider. Again, though, thanks for your honesty, and have a good day. --Imdanumber1 (talk · contribs) 00:40, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem...happy editing. Jmlk17 00:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

I'm pretty new here so it takes me a while to look up procedures. Thanks for the help with the vandal thing.--Shadowdrak 09:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh, of course! Not a problem. Jmlk17 10:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Caesar

Ah well, yes, it is one of the most hackneyed lines from Shakespeare. bibliomaniac15 05:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Your question

I've replied to your question on my talk page to keep the conversation in one place, but am telling you here as you requested to not have to check my page. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 10:37, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

You are very welcome. I've found that things always work out better when we treat each other with respect. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 21:06, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Your signature

Hi. I noticed that you are using two images in your signature. Could you kindly review WP:SIG and remove them at the earliest? Best, — Nearly Headless Nick ^{C} 09:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Whoops...got it changed. Thanks! Jmlk17 09:27, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

RfA

status

i want to add status to my user page.your help needed.User talk:Yousaf465

Confused by your message, but I replied on your talk page. Jmlk17 04:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

The online status temp.User talk:Yousaf465

My RfA

Administrator Reedy Boy taking off! Hello Jmlk17, Thankyou for voting in my RfA. You will be pleased to know that it has been successful!! Meaning that I, Reedy Boy, am now an English Wikipedia Administrator. It passed with a suprising 47/0/0, and I really am grateful of all your support, and I hope that I live up to your high expectations! If there is anything I can do to help you out, please, do not hesitate to contact me! Yours, Reedy Boy 16:12, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

YechielMan's RFA

Thank you for participating in either of my unsuccessful requests for adminship. Although the experience was frustrating, it showed me some mistakes I was making, and I hope to learn from those mistakes.

Please take a few minutes to read User:YechielMan/Other stuff/RFA review and advise me how to proceed. Best regards. YechielMan 21:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks! I enjoy working on all hockey articles, especially since I learn so much about whoever it's on. (Something inside of me pushed me to do Brodeur and the Devils first though, heh). I'm glad that my efforts are getting recognized, and hopefully I can get some more articles to FA-status soon :-) Sportskido8 06:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

I could take a look at Roy at some point. He really deserves a better article than that; only two references (properly formatted ones anyway) and no picture of him in a Canadiens uniform. It'll take a while but it'd be a fun project. Sportskido8 06:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again. Let me know if you need help on the Roy article. Sportskido8 07:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

I'll keep that in mind...thanks buddy! Jmlk17 07:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

The earlier vandalism

No problem. I like to help when I can, and don't like seeing people attack user and talk pages like that. Whoever that was must have really not liked you though. Have a good one! Trisar 08:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Ah...fighting vandalism has it's "downsides" lol. Jmlk17 08:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Deletion

Can you explain, in your own words, why you think Brown's gas and HHO gas should be deleted? The HHO article still needs some work to be neutral and scientific (which the nominator keeps disrupting), but the Brown's gas article is pretty good at this point. Even if you think the current article isn't well written, that's not a good reason for deleting it. — Omegatron 14:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

• I would like to remind this user of WP:NPA. Asking for WP:RS while you fail to do so for months does not constitute disruption. Feel free to provide some of those WP:RS in accepted scientific literature. Nomen Nescio^{Gnothi seauton} 14:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm quite confused here...not sure why I am being asked this question. Jmlk17 07:31, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

You asked me a couple questions on my talk page concerning HHO Gas] and Brown's Gas. I checked the edit histories of both, and have yet to find an instance in which I edited, nor even suggested deleting them. May I ask how I came into the conversation? Please reply on my talk page. Jmlk17 07:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Umm... because you were the first to vote in favor of deletion?

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/HHO_gas_(4th_nomination)#HHO_gas — Omegatron 23:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

If your vote was a mistake, please remove it. — Omegatron 00:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Then my original question stands. Why do you think it should be deleted? — Omegatron 14:59, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

My RfA ...

Hi. Thanks for supporting my request for adminship. It was successful and I am now an admin. If I can ever be of help, please let me know. Cheers, Black Falcon ^(Talk) 05:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Balmain Campus

Sorry that was unintentional delete of your comment. And also, I've semi-pro'ed the page so don't worry. Jason McConnell-Leech 08:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Snakes

Just to imform you, the Snakes on a wikipedia discussion is being worked on right now, if you'd like to see how long the articles are, you know, cuz you asked on the discussion, come to the Snake Project. P.S. I vote you for admirship.

§→Nikro 11:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Adminship

Congratulations, you are now an administrator - and with overwhelming support! If you haven't already, now is the time look through the Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide and Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me, or at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Warofdreams talk 02:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• Congratulations!!! Well done :) - Alison ☺ 02:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
• And first of many - well done! - Alison ☺ 03:51, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Congrats, and good luck! If you need help, just leave me a note and I'll try and get back to you. Majorly (talk) 11:35, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

• You're welcome. :) Acalamari 18:26, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: AIV

Thanks for the notice put up on WP:AIV about a vandal. They have not as of yet been blocked, due to the fact that they seemed to have stopped editing for now. But keep up the good work, but remember to warn users, as they cannot simply be blocked usually. Jmlk17 04:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

A couple of questions, as this is my first time reporting a vandal for banning:

• What behavior qualifies as active vandalism? This IP has vandalized the same article three times in the last week, most recently this evening. They may not be sitting at their computer waiting for it to be reverted, but they check this article often and delete the majority of it each time. I consider them active.
• Is it kosher for ME to recommend a ban if the final warning was issued by SOMEONE ELSE? That is what happened in this case. Just wondering. - MatthewBurton 04:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

You're Welcome

No Problem. I felt you were very qualified to be an admin. I hope you enjoy the old mop & bucket. Hopefully I can get to use them too one day. I also hope your feeling better, I read the message on top of this page. BH (T|C) 05:00, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations, and you're very welcome! Best of luck, peace profound, and happy editing for you as well! --Merovingian (T, C, E) 05:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, have fun with the new tools :) Congrats, and get to work! Daniel 05:31, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations. Peacent 08:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Yet another congrats! κaτaʟaveno^T_C 17:01, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

I hate u u deleted a article under construction srry i couldnt devote my life to wiki but it POs me to see ppl like u decide that since i have a life my articles will be deleted. Thanks alot dirt bag by the way do what u feel to me i have a life LOLS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trrslimfat (talk • contribs)

Already, eh? ;) Good luck with it all, I'm sure you'll do a fine job. Cheers! Riana ⁂ 07:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Dear Jmlk17, thanks for your support in my recent RfA, it was, however, unsuccessful. I am not the type of editor to be disheartened by such a result, and have gained much experience. If you have anything to contribute by way of improvements or comments, please don’t hesitate to tell me.

I will run again. Until then, Cheers, Dfrg.msc 07:14, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Records

Jmlk17

How do i go about uploading the article?

First, create a username, then create the article. Be sure to source it, and do not make it a simple ad :). Good luck buddy! Jmlk17 07:42, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Sock

You mind? --Dark Falls ^talk 09:01, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Just doesn't seem to get the message.... --Dark Falls ^talk 09:26, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Failed Sigma Chi Good Article Justification and Suggestions

1. Fair use rationale must be added to Image:Sigmachicrest.png, Image:Normanshield.jpg, Image:Order Constantine.jpg and Image:SigmachiFlag.jpg. The {{Non-free logo}} tag explicitly states...

This tag is meaningless without an accompanying fair use rationale which must be unique to the usage of THIS image in each article in which it is used. You must also give the source and copyright information for all fair-use images uploaded.

... see Image:Horizonslogo.jpg and Image:SigmaChiBadge.gif for examples.

2. The many typos need to be addressed... a couple example...

The founding of Sigma Chi began when came as the result of a disagreement...

He developes and implements...

He also cooridnates the publications...

As a general rule, each undergraguate chapter elects a female...

3. Founding section, under History does not have one reference. There are so many facts in this paragraph that need a reference I can't list them all. See WP:CITE for help.

4. Several {{fact}} tags need to be addressed.

5. Fair use rationale must be added to Image:Norman Shield.jpg. See {{bookcover}} tag for justification guidelines.

6. I recommend, but it's not required, to conform all your references to citation templates... makes it look much cleaner.

... Jazznutuva 09:52, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

My RFA

Hello, Jmlk17/Archive3, and thank you so much for your support in my recent RFA, which passed 59/0/0! I promise I won't erupt all over this nice Wikipedia, and I will try very hard to live up to your expectations. Please let me know if I can help you in any way, but first take your cookie! Thanks again! KrakatoaKatie 20:05, 8 June 2007 (UTC) NOTE: I'm not very creative, so I adopted this from RyanGerbil10 who swiped it from Misza13, from whom I have swiped many, many things. Chocolate chip cookies sold separately. Batteries not included. Offer not valid with other coupons or promotions. May contain peanuts, strawberries, or eggs. Keep out of the reach of small children, may present a choking hazard to children under the age of 3 and an electrical hazard to small farm animals. Do not take with alcohol or grapefruit juice. This notice has a blue background and may disappear into thin air. The recipient of this message, hereafter referred to as "Barnum's latest sucker", relinquishes all rights and abilities to file a lawsuit, to jump on a pogostick while standing on his head, and to leap out in front of moving trains. KrakatoaKatie, Jimbo Wales, and the states of Arkansas, Wisconsin, and Oklahoma are not liable for any lost or stolen items or damage from errant shopping carts or drivers such as Paris Hilton.

Re: AIV

Yup, anytime. Hope you get better (if you're still sick) Whsitchy 23:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

well, the hongkong counterfeit is back again. Whsitchy 00:02, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Your Assumption

Don't be too quick to assume that I am "impersonating" an admin. I had no idea that blocking was for admins only, though it does make sense. Like you said, I am new(er) here. Thanks for the heads-up though. However, I am very amazed that you jumped to the conclusion that I was "impersonating" an admin. There should be a way to block users if you are just a normal user though.... ---Signed By:KoЯnfan71 (User Page — My Talk — Contribs) 00:22, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Uhm...replied on your talk page. Jmlk17 00:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry. Ever since I started looking for vandalism, I have been being "yelled at" (more like corrected, but it feels like I'm being yelled at), and I had never been before that time. It almost makes one want to stop reverting vandalism and warning users. ---Signed By:KoЯnfan71 (User Page — My Talk — Contribs) 00:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Always great to have some encouraging words. I wondered how much controversy anti-vandalism people got caught up in. Great to know that many people get caught in it, which makes me want to go fight it more, though there is such a great volume that it will never stop. Oh well, always good to help out the cause. Thanks! ---Signed By:KoЯnfan71 (User Page — My Talk — Contribs) 00:42, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

{{Deletedpage}}

• cough*[1]*cough* – Steel 01:22, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Dammit...thanks! Jmlk17 01:31, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Raul Ries

Hi, I've been patrolling new pages casually. I thought that admins were no longer using the {{protectedpage}} template, now that cascading protection was enacted. (Wikipedia:Protected titles) Just curious as to what policy is on protected deleted pages these days. Happy editing!-RunningOnBrains 05:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Erm, [2]. I'd do it myself but I'm not yet mopworthy. --Butseriouslyfolks 05:38, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Got it taken care of. Jmlk17 05:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

eBay

Since you are the administrator who was following the vandalism to the eBay article, I feel that I should notify you that I reverted it once more: User_talk:69.137.185.37

Thanks! Rockerbaby 08:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the great anti-vandal work! Jmlk17 08:48, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism and adminness

No worries :) And yes, I am an admin, explaining my amateur revert today (I've gotten so used to rollback...) I just got myself desysopped temporarily to deal with exams. That way I can limit my activity here to about an hour a day, instead of 3-4 ;) Riana ⁂ 09:35, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Nope, Aussie. June's a bad time of year for me... and it should be a good one, birthday month! Ah well :) Riana ⁂ 09:38, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)

The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 15:04, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Congrats

I say that tongue in cheek on your successful RfA, as really it means welcome to more work! Some further reading on how your editing capabilities have expanded, as well as your responsibilities. Happy editing to you! Keegan^talk 05:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

May (Evans) Killeen, Leslie, Durward

Dear Jim,

Just a quick question - Are only the "Men" of Tombstone worth writting about? I had entered the obituary of May (Evans) Killeen, Leslie, Durward, and it was deleted. Leslie treated all the women in his life with abuse, yet we are not allowed to write about what happened to his wives "after" Leslie?

I would like to request the obituary be posted.

Lilly Alexander 15:10, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

speedy deletion

Please don't delete articles without some time passed after "speedy" tag posted. A cetrain time period is allowed for authors to fix the pointed problem. `'юзырь:mikka 16:07, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

My RfA :) (creative heading title, huh?)

Thank you for commenting on my RfA, which closed successfully with a tally of 76/0/1! I hope I will meet your expectations, and be sure I will continue trying to be a good editor as well as a good administrator :) If I may be of any assistance to you in the future (or if you see me commit some grievous error :), please drop me a line on my Talk page. Again, thank you, and happy editing! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 17:38, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Belated congratulations

Hey, just back "fresh" from Havana, had a great time, and I'm just about to fall asleep but I wanted to quickly say well done on your RFA, sorry to have missed it but you clearly didn't need my help after all! All the best for now, The Rambling Man 14:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

NHL 08 coverboy

I saw your question on Template talk:EA-NHL-series and figured I'd tell you who it's gonna be. According to communities.canada.com it's going to be Eric Staal. Bsroiaadn^Talk 03:56, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

BOT usernames

Per the policy on usernames, shown here, users with the name "bot" must be blocked indef., unless approved for a trial run at WP:BOT or granted by bureaucrat. Thus, your "bad AIV report" was invalid. Cheers! Miranda 08:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks :). I'm pretty new at the whole admin thing, and have been without internet (and still am) for a bit now, and am getting used to it. Thanks for that link; I appreciate it. I'd say "cheers", but I'm not very used to that as an American, so I'll just say thanks a bunch!  :) Jmlk17 08:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Also, while AIV is alright for reporting such things, usernames for admin intervention is now usually preferred. Thanks again! Jmlk17 08:18, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Might want to read this and this. Miranda 19:39, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

I got those bookmarked as a matter of fact lol, but thank you :). Jmlk17 19:41, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

UAA

Thank you. Even when something is blindingly obvious, either here, at WP:CSD or at WP:AIV, I always feel that at least two people should agree before anything is removed.--Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 09:07, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

A very good idea. Jmlk17 09:14, 14 June 2007 (UTC)