User talk:JMlover

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I want to create a user page as I have seen many others' user pages. I'm not sure where to start. I've tried it out a bit. If you go to User:JMlover, you should be able to see what I've tried out there. Any help and/or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

What you did on your userpage is just fine, but I suggest you try to read WP:UP to know the main purpose of having a userpage †Bloodpack† 21:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello there! If you want some help creating a cool user page, take a look at User:The Transhumanist/User page design. Good luck! If you have further questions, please replace the {{helpme}} template at the top of the page, and I or someone else will come and talk to you. GlassCobra 21:42, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Answer for JMlover

Hola Matt. I'm new to being a Wiki member and all. I joined the JW project and was looking through editing history as part of the "To Do" task. I came acrossed something and am slightly confused on what should be done. I don't know how long Inspire987 has been around but he/she went onto the Jehovah's Witnesses page and added a citation. The bot deleted the citation. Then Inspire987 came back and reverted the bot's deletion stating, "Citation is VERY IMPORTANT and should not be deleted!!!!!!!" Looks like the bot deleted the citation again. Here's the citation link that Inspire987 is trying to add: link. It's located in the "Controversy" section. I'm not sure if that citation is needed or not, so my question is, should we be fighting the bot and keeping the citation? Or should we side with the bot and leave the citation out? I saw that your name has been over that history a bit so I figured you'd be a good person to ask...although anyone can answer my question, I'm sure. JMlover 00:17, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

I think the bot is right in removing the link as it has zero educational value. It's essentially blogspam. Some of the more "weird" Witness beliefs are already listed in the Controversy Wiki, and if someone wanted to find out WHY any given critic considers those beliefs "weird" there are already a number of sites, references, and sources that will, at the very least, provide specifics. Duffer 00:38, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Riddle

Sorry bud, I have no idea. Duffer 20:21, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:DavidCook-LittleSparrow.jpg

Hi did you take this pic?Genisock2 (talk) 23:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

No, but a friend sent it to me. Should I have her upload it instead? JMlover (talk) 00:05, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:DavidCook-LittleSparrow.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:DavidCook-LittleSparrow.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:33, 11 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 14:33, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Article to be deleted

HELP. This article to be deleted in id.wiki. Can you help me to SAY KEEP in its Talk page, in Indonesia Wikipedia. I don't know why they don't appreciate Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, and Assembly. Thanks for your support. Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 09:15, 6 June 2008 (UTC)