Talk:Jingle All the Way

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.

Contents

[edit] Criticised for satirizing everything that is wrong?

What? That makes no sense. I'm not even sure what whoever wrote that meant to say. (Not to mention the mixture of American and British spellings.) 67.22.194.36 00:10, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

I'd actually like to see where it was criticized for this, as in a source.--70.187.173.227 18:42, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Guess someone wanted to write a novel!

Way too long-whatever happened to the term "synopsis"?!160.81.133.194 19:23, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

this has got to be a joke. someone either has too much time on their hands or really liked this movie Melander 02:38, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

I wrote a much pithier plot. Dear, 69.122.155.216, I don't really think that such an enormous plot is necessary- do you? Bantosh 20:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] whenever

Whenever the edit ban is lifted please replace Twin Cities with Twin Cities. Thank you.--Appraiser 19:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lawl

I'm kinda sad this page sucks because Jingle had probably the best and most scenes filmed within the Twin Cities compared to other films taking place in Mpls which featured generic stuff and sometimes actually in greater MN not here. I'm surprised no one has really done anything to that point which is why I come to Wikipedia for movie stuff in the first place. But yes please change it to Twin Cities .:DavuMaya:. 14:20, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Running time

Why is the running time listed as 103 min when it's really 88? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.253.64.213 (talk) 02:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)