User talk:Jimbo Herndan

[edit] License tagging for Image:Flatirons.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Flatirons.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Utah-geo-stub

S'alright. For future reference, all geography items are marked with geo-stubs, but there are separate ones for almost all countries and a lot of sub-national regions too (including all US states). Almost all of them are in the form CountryName-geo-stub, so if in doubt try that and use preview to see if it works. if it doesn't, then a generic stub's fine since someone else is bound to be able to fix it up later. Grutness...wha? 20:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Have a look at Wikipedia:Userboxes - that has all the information. Be careful, though - not everyone's a big fan of userboxes, and it's easy to make one that someone will object to. Good luck! Grutness...wha? 21:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome

Hello, Jimbo Herndan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

It looks like your first message was unfortunately from a bot. Sorry nobody welcomed you personally before this. Thanks for the great photographs! Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Again, welcome!  --Ginkgo100^talk 04:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I'm Back!

I was on a short break for a while, but I'm back! --Jimbo Herndan 19:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hypothetical WikiProject:Boulder

Wow, that's an exciting proposal. I'm inclined to say "no" because I don't have a very clear idea how much of a commitment -- and how much effort -- a WikiProject:Boulder would require. I have a strange feeling that the answer would be "too much for me to sign up now".

I guess I'm not as avid a Wikipedia editor as you are. I'm going to throw out a wild guess that I do fewer edits per day than you, but I might be wrong -- I have a tendency to work on articles by doing a series of small edits, so the "count" might be deceptively high.

You've had a logon to this grand intellectual arena for about three weeks. I've been around for almost nine months. Even so, I still consider myself something of a newbie/outsider in the world of Wikipedia. I'm sometimes aggressive in what I do with Wikipedia articles, sometimes cautious, but I'm still sort of picking my spots. Wikipedia has a vast array of conventions and customs, and I don't feel that I know them very well yet.

For instance, there is a WikiProject:Colorado already. I took a quick look at this project's "home page" (for lack of a better term) and it seems obvious that they have a big task list, and could surely use our help. For that reason, might it make better sense for us to sign up with that group? Furthermore, casually looking around, I saw a number of WikiProjects for states but I didn't notice very many for cities -- none for any city as small as Boulder. It seems to me that starting WikiProject:Boulder would go against a sort of de facto standard. I am not averse, necessarily, to overthrowing unwritten customs, but I don't feel strongly enough about WikiProject:Boulder to buck the tide.

-*-*-* sudden and violent change of subject *-*-*-

I was first turned on to Wikipedia in May 2006, when I accidentally encountered the Boulder, Colorado article as a Google search result. You might find it amusing to go into the change history and see what the Boulder article was at that time. Briefly, it was a long article that contained a lot of outrageous material. In particular, as I recall, there was a section entitled "A Culture of Rioting", and another section containing some objectionable opinions about the Jonbenet Ramsey case. The "people" section featured one person most prominently, the only one to be pictured other than Jonbenet. Can you guess who that was? WARD CHURCHILL! Apparently the article had been the target of "edit wars" for a long time before I showed up, and I contributed my own two cents to continuing edit wars, as you can see from the Boulder discussion page.

Somehow, all of that has calmed down now. I don't know why the Boulder-bashers have retreated, but they have. The Boulder article has improved from awful to okay. Just okay. Feature articles on Wikipedia are better than this one, both in writing style and in the content chosen for inclusion. The article could also use a better "skyline" picture -- the one we have now is a shot of the Pearl Street Mall at night, in which almost nothing is visible.

I am of the opinion that the city of Boulder is a tougher target (for an encyclopedia article) than most other topics.

For instance, you expressed incredulity that Jonbenet Ramsey was not mentioned in the Boulder article. Well, the Ramsey case is so controversial that most previous versions of the article had contained really objectionable material about her. Long-time observers of the Boulder article were holding their breath in anticipation of the Jonbenet wars being revived, which (thankfully) does not seem to have happened. (Good job, by the way -- Jonbenet does need one brief mention in Boulder, Colorado, with a link to her own article, which is just about what we have now.)

Another article that I discovered early on was entitled Colorado Chautauqua Park. Yes, it was about that area that we know and love, located just south of 9th and Baseline. However, the article as I found it was short -- only about four or five sentences -- and every sentence in the article, as well as the title, was misleading if not outright false.

I have renamed the article, and I have been working on The Colorado Chautauqua article, off and on, ever since. To do justice to the history of this wonderful local institution in an encyclopedia article is not easy. I don't feel that I am done with this article -- it's a sort of labor of love for me. I could say some of the same things about the more general article on the Chautauqua movement, which of course I discovered because of the connection to our own Independent Chautauqua in Boulder.

• -*-*-*

Welcome into the pool. The water is fine, as you have already discovered. I think you're more gung-ho than I, however. Paul 20:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Store names in a table

Hi Jimbo.

I don't know quite what you had in mind here, but how's this? Paul 09:03, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Caffe Sole

Hi! You said: Hey, would it be better if I made a Restaurants and Coffee Shops section in the Boulder, Colorado article and moved it there, and added some other restaurants and Coffee Shops? That's not a bad idea, although you should try to be concise. Also, if you like writing about Boulder, maybe you would enjoy contributing to Wikitravel? They are more oriented towards information that would help a visitor. Regards, FreplySpang 20:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to WikiProject Colorado!

Welcome, Jimbo Herndan to WikiProject Colorado! We hope you can contribute to our ongoing effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Colorado-related articles to a feature-quality standard. Some useful links: WikiProject Colorado: Members, infoboxes, templates, etc. What you can do: Add {{Project Colorado}} to talk pages of all Colorado-related articles. De-stub Colorado stubs.

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:CaffeSole.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:CaffeSole.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rklawton 13:49, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] how do i block

I wish to block User:67.190.0.146 for constant recent vandalism, how would i go about doing that?

[edit] Block

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 63.231.90.241 lifted or expired. Request handled by: 210physicq (c) 18:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Why is it that I am blocked almost every day for this reason? I was busy for a while, and when I got back I get this message. Please someone reply... --Jimbo Herndan 17:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Apparently, your IP also happens to be in the range that another user persistently abuses. We apologize for the inconvenience. —²¹⁰physicq (c) 18:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pentax Optio W10

I saw that you created the Pentax Optio W10 article with the company name in all caps i.e 'PENTAX Optio W10'. I direct you to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks), where it notes:

Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules even if the trademark owner encourages special treatment

Companies often do stuff like this with their logos and whatnot. The company name is 'Pentax', even if they use all capital letters in their logo. I've moved the article in line with this policy. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! --Imroy 02:13, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked Again

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 63.231.90.241 lifted or expired. Request handled by: Yamla 15:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

This vandal is really getting on my nerves... --Jimbo Herndan 14:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Ours too, though it obviously affects you more. WP:TOR may possibly offer you some help via the ssl-based urls, but I don't have any direct experience with that. --Yamla 15:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] About the "Roman" article

Dude, if we don't even know a lot of info about Niko yet, do you think that Roman needs one? He's a supporting character, and no supporting GTA characters have their own articles; it should be deleted or redirected until futher notice. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 01:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, those characters don't have their own articles, anyway, and they don't deserve them; when the time is right, Roman will be integrated into the GTA 4 characters list. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 01:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked again?

Just got back from vacation, and now this...

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 63.231.90.241 lifted or expired. Request handled by: 210physicq (c) 02:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for so graciously unblocking me. All I have to say is this vandal is just horrible. I checked out some of his stuff, and he seems to be all over the place. But I think we should just ignore him, and he'll get bored and leave. What do you think?--Jimbo Herndan 05:07, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, it takes time. And patience. —²¹⁰physicq (c) 03:14, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed Cold War history project

I notice that you had expressed interest in the proposal for a project relating to the Cold War at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Cold War history. The proposal has generated sufficient interest to be considered viable, but the original proposer has been inactive for some time, so no one has been following it. I was wondering whether you, as one of the interested parties, would be interested in establishing the project as an independent entity or possibly as a task force of Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history. Please indicate your opinion in the comments section here. Thank you for your interest in the subject, and for your timely response. John Carter 21:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

The project is now active at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cold War. John Carter 21:45, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:29thmap.gif listed for deletion

[edit] The Sims

The consensus was to merge the announced film to The Sims#Film. Please do not violate consensus without discussion. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 00:27, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

I know, but here's the thing. As an editor who works in future films, I've found that a lot of films that get announced don't always enter production. You can see my subpage here that lists films still not in production that date back to the 1990s. Usually, the rule of thumb to show that a film will be produced is when it has a director, a cast, and a production start date in place. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 00:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:42379691 airport ap416.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:42379691 airport ap416.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:16, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:It2i2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:It2i2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. _TheIslander 23:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Please note that what you have added to Image:It2i2.jpg does not constitute a fair-use rationale. Please see fair use rationale. Thank you. _TheIslander 13:39, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Myst Garden.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Myst Garden.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 00:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Stewart-Colbert.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Stewart-Colbert.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 01:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sobota.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sobota.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DaVinciCodeLouvre.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DaVinciCodeLouvre.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:54, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:51SbN2wNzpL. AA240 .jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:51SbN2wNzpL. AA240 .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:37, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rodinka.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rodinka.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:29thStreet.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:29thStreet.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —PNG crusade bot ^(feedback) 22:35, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:29thStreet.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:29thStreet.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)