From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'm just an ordinary guy that likes to learn a little about a wide variety of subjects. I'm a noob and don't know all the WP rules and probably never will. I think I know enough to contribute and modify some of the content and maybe correct some spelling and whatnot, but I'll probably never be much good at the style and format stuff. I enjoy Philosophy, Psychology, Sociology and a lot of other things that end in -ology and will likely be in those areas most of the time. I'm basically a peace, love, contribution and cooperation kind of guy. Please don't be offended if I change what you wrote or ask questions about it on the talk page, I'm not intending to offend anyone, just trying to get a little closer to the truth if possible. Feel free to email or leave me a message. Madam, I am single and looking. Thanks, --Jim 21:49, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Philosophy Category
WikiProject Philosophy task list
- German Idealism and almost all the articles related to it need to be either rewritten or expanded, because a wikipedia user called Lestrade has, among other things, taken it upon himself to imbue each page with bias in favour of Schopenhauer, who he attempts to present as having the last say in everything. This is a terrible thing to do, because German Idealism is such an important period in philosophy, whose influence is still strongly felt today.
- Protected Values first section confuses right action and values and needs a copy edit, moving and wikifying
- Ludwig Wittgenstein is having its FA status reviewed due to a couple of concerns. Help save Ludwig! See Wikipedia:Featured article review/Ludwig Wittgenstein for requirements for retaining FA status.
- Quality (philosophy) needs a more clear explanation.
- Socratic dialogues could do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change.
- Problem of universals: The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version.
- Teleology: the article is shallow and inconsistent.
- Existentialism: the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention.
- Star of Sophia Vote for or nominate someone you think is deserving!
- Analytic_philosophy This is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered.
- Inverse (logic) This article makes me wish that there were a fail grade on the quality scale. Someone should rewrite it.
Vote | Larry's Text | stubs | edit this list | discuss these tasks | Category:Philosophy | Portal:Philosophy | RFC | Deletion | Requested articles | Noticeboard | Discussion
|
