Talk:Jim Smith (footballer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jim Smith (footballer) article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.
WikiProject on Football The article on Jim Smith (footballer) is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by the England task force.

[edit] Article Name

Why does this article have the title of 'Jim Smith (footballer)? He isn't a footballer anymore. --TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 13:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

He isn't a manager any more either, he is a director. The point is to distinguish him from other Jim Smiths, which (Manager) doesn't really do effectively, as it doesn't actually mention football. I agree that he is probably better known as a football manager than a footballer, in which case there is an argument for a move to Jim Smith (football manager), but the WP:FOOTY convention seems to be to go with (footballer) for any managers that played the game. I guess this is because a) this is where they established their notability (even if they went on to become more notable as a manager) and b) for simplicity, it saves arguments about whether they were more notable as a player or as a manager. I will raise this at WPFOOTY to get some consensus as to what the article name should be. --Jameboy (talk) 10:03, 20 April 2008 (UTC)