Talk:Jill Pike

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-07-02. The result of the discussion was Delete.

This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-10-15. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Plus, she's smokin' hot!

Agreed. She is absolutely scorching.

[edit] Line Removal

Due to her striking good looks, Jill has attracted a lot of attention, particularly from male listeners [2]

This is verifiable information. A citation needed tag is okay, but removal of verifiable information violates WP:POV.--Marriedtofilm 15:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

It is only verifiable if a WP:RS said that, in those words. Removal, rather than a citation needed tag, is required under those circumstances. I'll let it go for now, as the article is probably going to be deleted, anyway. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 00:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

As the paragraph as been changed and the two sentences are verified "in those words," this argument is moot. --Marriedtofilm 00:53, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Corrected your spelling (mute > moot), and I agree now, although I still think the article should be deleted. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 10:00, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the sp correction! I actually think, thanks to your scrutiny, the article is better now for it. --Marriedtofilm 15:27, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Where's her picture? Jeez, she's smoking hot! You have articles for navel lint, Pocket Pool, Dirty Sanchez, etc. and you want to delete this one. What a joke! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.96.18.5 (talk • contribs) .