User talk:Jgp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive

Archives
1

2

Contents

[edit] Merge

We need your help at Talk:Tokusatsu :3—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 01:52, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pentium M revisions

Hi, recently you reverted an addition I made to

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Pentium_M_microprocessors

where I added the fact that Pentium-M are also Socket 478 (not just Socket 479). Please visit these links to convince yourself that they edits were not "vandalism".

http://processorfinder.intel.com/List.aspx?ProcFam=942

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16819111176

Here is a socket 478 motherboard for pentium M http://www.msicomputer.com/product/p_spec.asp?model=915GM_Speedster-FA4R&class=spd

From that page: "Note: On Intel Pentium-M/Celeron-M Dothan CPU, with a choice of 478pins and 479pins P-M CPU socket, MSI designed 478pins P-M CPU socket on this board."

You might also be interested in looking a the pictures on the right side of "The BalusC Server". The pictures show both "PM Banias S478 pins" and "PM Banias S479 balls". The picture shows 478 pins and 479 balls respectively. http://balusc.xs4all.nl/srv/har-cpu-int-pm.php 75.2.59.169 13:42, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Alright. I'm fine with having separate entries. But deleting the S-479 entries was a big no-no. jgp TC 13:45, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Okay. I guess the problem we were having is that I was looking up the "part number" on Intel's website (which said 478 pin) while you were remembering the 479 pin version that also exists, but didn't match the part number on the page. 75.2.59.169 18:34, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop reverting my changes without first investigating. Thanks


--- There are both socket 479 AND 478 pentium M. Only those that Intel's website say are 478 pin are changed to socket 478.

[edit] Celeron

Hi, just wondered what your objection was to my last edit to the Celeron article. Yonah-1024 surely belongs in the Core architecture section rather than the Pentium M (Banias/Dothan) section? Letdorf 12:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC).

Because it doesn't use the Core microarchitecture (and sorry about leaving no edit summary--it's been a long time since I used popups, and I'm atill getting used to them again). jgp TC 12:32, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Hmmmm....more confusion from Intel; the Core Solo isn't Core microarchitecture! I will still reinstate the other edits in that revision though. Letdorf 13:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Response

What do you mean by the image thing you were talking about? Rtkat3 T 1:55, 25 December 2006 (UTC).

Read Wikipedia's fair use policy. Flooding articles with utterly irrelevant images is not allowed. jgp TC 18:57, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pseudoinformation

I can understand your frustration, as I have been dealing with a similar vandal recently. It is very difficult for an admin on AIV to make that judgement without knowing the subject matter. Please stay in contact, so we can find a way to make it easier to report those kind of cases. Agathoclea 10:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for cleaning up the vandalism to my user page. Hatch68 19:21, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Removing talk page comments

At the moment, User:FasterPussycatWooHoo is not banned or even blocked. Therefore, your removal of his comments here was absolutely improper, and if you do so again, you will be blocked. | Mr. Darcy talk 16:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

His posts were highly incivil and filled with personal attacks. Even without his ban, the removal would be no different than, for example, the removal of similarly-offensive comments by User:74.195.3.199 and User:199.80.117.24 from Talk:Power Rangers: Operation Overdrive and Talk:Juuken Sentai Gekiranger, which was performed by miltiple users. Furthermore, the consensus for his ban was unanimous, and it has been made very clear by _everyone_ who weighed in that FP is not welcome on that page. jgpTC 22:45, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
I do not appreciate you threatening and harrassing me over this. You know what? I will not going to edit the encyclopedia anymore until FP is gone. I have no desire to participate in an environment where disruptive trolls like FP are mollycoddled and get to run free, while I get attacked and threatened for trying to do something about it. You have only yourself to blame for this. You can have FP editing the enyclopedia or you can have me editing the encyclopedia, but not both. jgpTC 22:45, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
I have no idea what that threat is supposed to accomplish. Your behavior was out of line. You haven't been blocked or sanctioned in any way. The best response would be to acknowledge your mistakes and alter your behavior in the future. FWIW, you don't seem to understand how we ban users. The fact that a small number of users, most of whom were directly involved in the content dispute, think he should be banned is immaterial. Have a look at Wikipedia:Banning policy, which states quite clearly that community bans must result from the dispute resolution process, which hasn't been undertaken here. The best course of action here is to see if FPWH alters his behavior, because if he doesn't, he's going to end up blocked anyway. | Mr. Darcy talk 06:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
It's been about a week since I last edited anything, and you deserve some kind of response: it's not a threat. I simply do not feel comfortable in a community when those who do nothing but disrupt are given free rein, and those who actually try to do something about it are threatened. It's not something I want to participate in. For the record, I'm enjoying my Wikibreak -- I've found that my stress goes down considerably when I disassociate myself from this hotbed of politics and drama. jgpTC 02:57, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Oh, and his posts since the brief block have been obnoxious, but not all that uncivil, and I haven't seen any new personal attacks. His major violation is disruption, and if he doesn't stop, he'll be blocked. | Mr. Darcy talk 06:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Requesting your comments on the Everywhere Girl section in The Inquirer article

Since you are one of the involved users who support the Everywhere Girl section, I'd appreciate it if you can leave a comment in the talk page. Dionyseus 00:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bad faith?

Hi there! I've asked you a followup question on the AN/I thread, but you may have missed it, it's a pretty active discussion. Specifically, I'd like to know why you characterized those endorsements of the deletion as bad faith edits. That's a very, very serious charge, as many of the people who made the edits you identified are long time contributors and editors in good standing. If you wish to assert that all of those people made bad faith edits, then I encourage you to provide some evidence and immediately bring it to the noticeboard separately so that the appropriate parties can be blocked/sanctioned appropriately. If, on the other hand, you meant to use a different term, I'd ask you to consider rephrasing your accusation of bad faith edits to avoid a misunderstanding. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 22:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Userbox "archive"

Since that page is intended merely an archive of code, I'm going to remove the Wikipedian categories from the page, since it's incorrectly categorising you (and due to the several redlinked categories on that page as well). - jc37 01:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)