User talk:Jgk168421

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi Jgk168421, welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are a few helpful links to start you off: Avoiding common mistakes, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style, Policies and guidelines, Help, Merging pages.

If you need help or are curious about something, feel free to ask on my talk page or the village pump. You can sign your name and a date stamp on comments using four tildes (~~~~). If you have any further questions, feel free to ask, and I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian! Andre (talk) 14:34, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] WikiProject Calvinism

Hi Jgk168421.

I just saw your contributions to Free Presbyterian Church of Victoria and William Miller (minister) and thought you might be interested in the below:

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Calvinism

The goal of WikiProject Calvinism is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Calvinism available on Wikipedia. WP:WikiProject Calvinism as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Calvinism, but prefers that all Calvinist traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

Keep up the good work. Blarneytherinosaur gabby? 04:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tracing Your Family History in Australia.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Tracing Your Family History in Australia.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Okay. It wasn't particularly important and is not worth arguing over. Jgk168421 (talk) 09:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HobartFreeman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HobartFreeman.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

THis has been addressed Jgk168421 (talk) 09:23, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reformed Church of Canberra

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Reformed Church of Canberra, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Reformed Church of Canberra. StAnselm (talk) 08:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I disagree with your assessment as to what is of sufficient notability for inclusion. I think it reflects your ideological and philosophical predispositions. Jgk168421 (talk) 09:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)