User talk:Jevon Tompkins

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Jevon Tompkins. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Do not add hoax articles to Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 22:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. —tregoweth (talk) 22:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Killer Movie

Please do not remove the tag future from the article. Wikipedia, and for that matter any encyclopedia, are not supposed to contain info about future events. You can remove it after the film's release. Kai A. Simon 21:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I'm Gonna Git You Sucka

Please don't move article arbitrarily, as you did with I'm Gonna Git You Sucka. It is considered vandalism. —tregoweth (talk) 23:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] It's On (Petey Pablo) 187um Killa‎

Please stop creating this; it makes no claim to the notability of its subject (which, indeed, appears to have none), has no sources, and thus meets our criteria for speedy deletion (which is why it's been deleted twice). Note also:

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 13:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Final warning

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Wesley Jonathan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 20:59, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jevon Tompkins

I do not no all of that stuff why are you trying to block me off and all of the stuff is true?

I'm not sure that I understand your question, but you need to read WP:CITE and Wikipedia:Edit summaries, as well as WP:Notability. These are our policies and guidelines, and if you keep violating them you'll be blocked from editing. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 15:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Block

For personal abuse. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 19:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Str8 off tha Streetz of Compton City

I've AfDed two article created by you; you might want to defend them against the strong suspicion that they're hoaxes, or at least wholly unnotable. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:29, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attacks.

With regards to your comments on User talk: Mel Etitis: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Acalamari 18:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Too late for warnings

You've earnt yourself an editing block. When the block expires, please behave yourself, otherwise the next block will be longer. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:25, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to Wikipedia articles about living persons, as you did to Wesley Jonathan. Thank you. NrDg 20:29, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] CSD Notification

A tag has been placed on Killer movie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Copy and paste of Scary Movie. Not an alternative title

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.


[edit] Speedy deletion of Killer movie

A tag has been placed on Killer movie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NrDg 21:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Speedy deletion of Killer Movie

A tag has been placed on Killer Movie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NrDg 21:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] TBA (New Edition album)

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article TBA (New Edition album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Jevon Tompkins, you will be blocked from editing. NrDg 06:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pulp Fiction

Your additions to the article concerning Carolco's reputed involvement will continue to be reverted unless you can provide sourcing for your claims. I have examined all the standard reference works discussing the film and do not find a single mention of Carolco. Please familiarize yourself with our policies: Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Citing sources.

In the future, please be particularly careful about adding unverified material that distorts and misrepresents quotations and other cited content. When you change

Pulp Fiction premiered in May 1994 at the Cannes Film Festival. The Weinsteins "hit the beach like commandos", bringing the picture's entire cast over.[1]

to

Pulp Fiction premiered in May 1994 at the Cannes Film Festival. The Weinsteins and Mario Kassar alongside with Andrew Vajna "hit the beach like commandos", bringing the picture's entire cast over.[2]

you are distorting the verifiable content of the quoted material. The author makes no mention of Kassar or Vajna, let alone describes them as "hit[ting] the beach like commandos," as he does the Weinsteins. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Quotations, and note especially, "As an editor, it is your responsibility to read the source of the quotation thoroughly, in order to prevent misrepresentation." Best, Dan.—DCGeist (talk) 17:11, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Ahhh. I see what's going on. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Pulp Fiction, you will be blocked from editing. —DCGeist (talk) 17:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Repeated vandalism tag

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Poetic Justice, you will be blocked from editing. —DCGeist (talk) 17:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Chicago+Joe.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Chicago+Joe.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:42, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:213986.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:213986.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:08, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Res-Dogs-C.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Res-Dogs-C.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 17:40, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Chicago+Joe.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Chicago+Joe.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Wesleyjonathan1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wesleyjonathan1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:36, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Cinergi.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Cinergi.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NrDg 18:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:C2pictures.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:C2pictures.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NrDg 18:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:NewEdition2008.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:NewEdition2008.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NrDg 18:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:TriStarTelevision1992logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:TriStarTelevision1992logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NrDg 18:28, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Get Back (film)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Get Back (film), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mtv.com/movies/movie/199495/moviemain.jhtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:TriStarTelevision1992logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TriStarTelevision1992logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mona Must Die

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mona Must Die, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mtv.com/movies/movie/91715/moviemain.jhtml. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Mona Must Die. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. NrDg 12:50, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Get Back (film). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. NrDg 12:54, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Ming Lo Moves the Mountain. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. NrDg 13:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed deletion of Ming Lo Moves the Mountain

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ming Lo Moves the Mountain, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? NrDg 13:20, 17 May 2008 (UTC)