Talk:Jesse Helms

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject North Carolina, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve North Carolina-related articles to a feature-quality standard.
North Carolina Portal
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Alleged racism

I believe that a section on Senator Helms's alleged racism is warrented. [this anonymous comment was added on 4 June 2005 by 24.159.43.93]

Do you have sources supporting that he is racist? Or sources that say that many think he is racist? --Spangineer (háblame) 11:05, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
I didn't write the original comment, but how about this "Race was a frequent backdrop in Helms' public life. In 1950, U.S. Sen. Frank Porter Graham faced fellow Democrat Willis Smith in a hotly contested runoff. Helms supported Smith, whose supporters were accused of using racial smears. A handbill purported to show a photo of Graham's wife dancing with a black man. Smith won, and Helms was often accused of having a role in the tactics... Charges of racial politics arose again in 1990 when Helms faced former Charlotte Mayor Harvey Gantt. One Helms ad showed a pair of white hands crumpling a job rejection letter as a voice says, "You needed that job, but they had to give it to a minority." --DoorFrame
Looks convincing to me. I'm not too familiar with this senator, so I was initially a bit skeptical, especially with the kind of edits this page has been getting over the past day or so (i.e. lots of vandalism). But sounds like there's some good references to support that he was indeed quite racist. --Spangineer (háblame) 22:43, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)
Can anyone say strawman conversation? This is ridiculous. Mike 22:05, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
There's not a shred of evidence that he was racist or segregationist, ever. 71.70.174.75 15:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Where are you from and how old are you, anonymous? I can't point to a website that has archives, but anyone from NC who has been around a while will tell you in no uncertain terms that Mr. Helms spent the 60s editorializing on WRAL-TV against blacks and for segregation. I'm sure the evidence is in the archives at WRAL, and I'm willing to walk away from WP forever if you can prove me wrong. You willing to do the same? -Jcbarr 19:04, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry to jump in here a year and a half late, but I guess it is never too late to set the record straight. I've lived in NC for 24 years, and I've been a attentive observer of the political tussles here, and I have never seen any evidence at all that Helms was racist, nor any evidence that he was a segregationist. I can't speak from personal experience about anything prior to 1984, but I witnessed several really hard-fought Senate campaigns, and there can be no doubt that if there were any reliable evidence of Helms' supposed racism his Democrat opponents would have openly used it against him. They didn't. Instead, they ran disreputable whisper campaigns, spreading false rumors about him. For example, an African-American friend here in Raleigh told me that she knew that Helms had once said that "the only good n____r is a dead n____r." Of course she had not heard it herself, but she'd been told. NCdave (talk) 04:41, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV

What about this senator's wild attacks against art and artistic critical thinking? This senator was a censor and an ennemy of democracy in his crusade against the arts, not far from the infamous Mac Carthy. This article is not encyclopedic, it is a hagiography. I guess it is being controlled by Americans, and furthermore by American Conservatives... See Steven Dubin, Arresting images, Routledge, 1992, if you want to correct this grossly inappropriate Wikipedia article!

There are other parts to Helms's career than his racism - arts policy and relations with the UN come to mind. His Wikipedia article shouldn't be merely a collection of anecdotes about how he doesn't like black people. That shortchanges readers on both sides of the aisle. --Saucy Intruder (talk) 13:06, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

On the other hand, Helms is perhaps most famous for his most controversial remarks. No doubt why so many of them show up here. I'm sure his statements on the arts and the UN are a bit more boring. Beanbatch 17:08, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
Maybe so, but who are we to decide it's not worthy information for an encyclopedia? We don't only include what is flashy or controversial! At least, I hope we don't... Zanturaeon 11:12, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
We DO get decide what is worthy, this is Wiki! We could just say "Jesse was a senator" and be done. But any encyclopedia focuses on why someone is famous (or infamous). There are lots of senators. There are not many Jesse Helmses. What makes him different and interesting? Mainly the controversial stuff. We should not shy away from documented facts, even if they are ugly. We should neither engage in hostile POVs, as some of this article does. I see nothing wrong with including documented quotes from the senator himself. Folks added these to back up their racist claims with facts. Beanbatch 17:38, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
Beanbatch has a very good point I think. To not point out his racism would be like ignoring the elephant in the room. H.P. Lovecraft was racist, and there's even information about that on his wiki. Roint 04:52, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
To not point out his racism would be simply honest. There's not a shred of evidence that Helms was ever racist or segregationist.
Nor was he ever against the arts. In fact, he was a longtime patron of the arts, for example with his very generous support for the non-profit classical musical station, WCPE Raleigh. He opposed government-supported porn, not art. To pretend otherwise is to blatantly misrepresent him.
I deleted the link to this ridiculous Barry Yoeman smear piece: http://www.barryyeoman.com/articles/whitewashed.html which says that Helms "had his fingers in everything from black-voter intimidation to a veiled threat against President Clinton's life." Of course he did no such thing, ever, and that sort of smear has no place in Wikipedia, even as a link. NCdave (talk) 15:14, 7 June 2006 (UTC); 04:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC); and 01:31, 14 January 2008 (UTC).

[edit] Invading Geneva

I just noticed this on a discussion board somewhere:

Actually I do believe US senator Jesse Helms called for as much recently. I believe during the whole "Americans should not be subject to trials at the world court for war crimes but we don't mind if brown people are put on trial" debate, Helms demanded congress pass a law that basically said if an American was ever put on trial before the world court, it would automatically trigger a law compelling the US government to invade The Hague.

Is there a source for this? [this unsigned comment was added on 24 August 2005 by 211.202.17.124]

[edit] Quotes, etc.

I think that anything attributed to the Senator as a quote must be documented by a verifiable source. This business about racism is interesting, but much appears to be politically motivated. Obviously there are different perspectives on this man and we should strive for objectivity.

Questionable sources are not acceptable either. Mike 14:21, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

These certainly should be cited:

...as his "humorous" habit of calling all black people "Fred." Helms' seemingly nostalgic remembrances of segregation also led many to call him racist.

These editorials are often cited as proof that Helms is prejudiced. For example, in one he calls the University of North Carolina the "University of Negroes and Communists."

Beyond the matter of proper citations, the article is peppered with many NPOV flags like "many have said" or "some say." Who said what? When did they say it? Where and when was it reported? [this unsigned comment was added on 28 February 2006 by 137.189.4.1]

[edit] Views on AIDS in Africa

Perhaps someone could contribute to his views on AIDS in Africa. He was monumental in refusing AIDS prevention measures citing that it was due to immorality. He then partered up with Bono for a bill to increase AID to Africa [this unsigned comment was added on 10 November 2005 by 129.100.191.114]

Before his retirement, Helms led the fight in Congress for an emergency appropriation of funds to combat AIDS in Africa, primarily by providing antiviral drugs to HIV-positive pregnant moms and their newborn infants, which drastically reduces the risk of transmission of the virus from the mother to her baby.[1][2] After Helms retired, President Bush led the effort.[3] NCdave (talk) 05:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] MLK Holiday

In Controversies: "Helms has long been suspected of holding racist views. Even the sympathetic conservative magazine National Review, while praising him for his stalwart conservativism, described him as "prejudiced."

Helms opposed the Martin Luther King holiday bill in 1983 on grounds that King had two associates with communist ties, Stanley Levison and Jack O'Dell, and he was also angered by King's alleged philandering."

There may be strong evidence that this man was bigoted and indeed racist but his opposition to the Martin Luther King holiday bill does not neccesarily warrant this view or at least not for the reasons mentioned. The accompanying details only support his view and position as an anti-communist and a moralist but not as a racist. Any racism is only implied there due purely on King's race and I would personally recommend entirely removing as it currently reads. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Light Bulb (talk • contribs) 22:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC).

Helms did not use racist arguments in opposing the MLK holiday bill. I think I recall that he made the point that President Washington was more worthy of the honor of a holiday in his name than was MLK Jr. That's hard to argue with, so Helms' critics didn't bother: they just called him names. NCdave (talk) 05:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Wow NCdave you sure know how to paint him in a good light. Helms opposed the bill using these arguments: Helms said that he thought it "ironic" that "black citizens" were the ones who most needed jobs and yet were demanding a holiday. he announced that he also opposed the holiday because King had used "nonviolence as a provocative act to disturb the peace of the state and to trigger, in many cases, overreaction by authorities" and that King supported "action-oriented Marxism." Then he yielded the floor. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/20/AR2008012002267.html Since you require hard evidence for every statement made about him, go ahead and pull the transcript from the archives. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.120.107.174 (talk) 21:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

What is your point, 71.120.107.174? Are you saying that you think either of those remarks was racist? If so, I don't see it. NCdave (talk) 18:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Helm's abandonment of POW/MIA and KAL 007 issues?

Should something be included in the article about Helms' abandonment of pursuing the POW amd KAL 007 issues once having started the investigation? Does anyone know anything about this? Here's what I have about this -

In the United States, by the early '90s, the steam had gone out of Jesse Helms'Committee on Foreign Relations Minority Staff and interest in KAL 007 soon ceased. This may have been connected to the dismissal by Senator Helms of eight committee members, including Minority Staff Leader Jim Lucier (who later became a senior editor with the conservative “Insight” magazine). Retired Rear Admiral "Bud" Nance, a childhood friend of Jesse Helms, had ordered the "house cleaning" - incidental to his assuming the position of Minority Staff Leader in place of Jim Lucier. In Admiral Nance's own words concerning the experience of commencing his new appointment, “It [the Committee] was a zoo to me. My military mind has got to have all the men and women in line.” Not only had interest in KAL 007 fizzled, but many activists and families connected with the POW/MIA cause likewise soon became aware of the Committee's extreme drop in interest in the cause they espoused. POW/MIA matters had become intertwined with KAL 007 matters with Senator Helms' writing (Dec. 5th and 10th, 1991) to Boris Yeltsin requesting/demanding information concerning both matters (see pg. 3 of [4].89.138.16.137Bert Schlossberg89.138.16.137

I don't know anything about his alleged abandonment of those issues, but I do recall that Sen. Helms was also flying to Korea on Aug. 31, 1983. There were two KAL planes that night headed for Korea from the United States. KAL 007 departed from New York, and KAL 015 departed from LA. The two planes both landed for refueling in Alaska, and the passengers waited together in the gate area before reboarding. While they waited, Sen. Helms got acquainted with a small child, a little girl who was riding on KAL 007. She (presumably) lost her life a few hours later when the Soviets shot down her plane.
Sen. Helms had originally been booked on KAL 007, as well, but switched to the other flight, so that he could attend a Texas fundraiser hosted by Dallas Cowboys' football coach Tom Landry. NCdave (talk) 05:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
I found a bit more info on this incident. There were actually two little girls, not one:
Jessie[sic] Helms would later write Boris Yeltsin, “This event had an element of a personal catastrophe for me, since I was on the parallel flight that night on KAL-015, which departed Anchorage, Alaska about fifteen minutes after KAL-007. Both flights stopped in Anchorage for refueling. I shall never forget mingling with the doomed passengers of KAL-007 in the transit lounge, including two sweet young girls who waved goodbye to me when they were called to return to their fatal flight.” Those two girls were Noelle and Stacy Grenfell.
The conventional wisdom is that everyone aboard KAL 007 died when it was attacked. However, that quote is from the final paragraph in the epilogue of a book whose author believes KAL 007 probably ditched successfully, and that some or all of the passengers were taken captive by the Soviets. You may read the entire epilogue here: [5]. Sorry, I don't know enough to have an opinion about whether or not that author could be right. NCdave (talk) 01:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Controversies References

The controversies section is very poorly referenced, the references are either to ideological publications or are nonexistant. Fix them or they should be removed per convention. 70.17.101.218 (talk) 21:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

I strongly agree! At first glance the reference links after several of the alleged racist remarks make it appear that there must be something to these accusations against Helms. But if you follow the links you'll find they point to unreliable sources, like the notoriously leftist FAIR, and an anti-Christian blog site, www.bettybowers.com. NCdave (talk) 06:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps there does need to be some mention of some of the controversies surrounding Sen. Helms, but it should be truthful, not a load of undocumented and poorly documented accusations by his political enemies.
Some of the material in this section is very obviously nonsense. For example, after a describing a conversation which (Sen. Moseley-Braun claimed) occurred between herself and Sen. Helms in an elevator, the article says, "Following the incident, Helms hired Claude Allen, who is black, as his press secretary." Actually, Mr. Allen worked for Sen. Helms in the 1980s, and Moseley-Braun did not become a senator until 1993.
This paragraph is especially pernicious:
"Helms used racial issues in many elections; for instance, in 1990, he ran the famous 'Hands' television ad in a tough re-election race. The ad has become legendary in Southern political circles as the most direct appeal to white backlash in modern American politics. The ad played upon white voters' fears that affirmative action policies might prevent them from getting a job that would go to a 'less-qualified' black person"
That description turns the truth exactly upside down. The ad in question was anti-racist. It accurately criticized Gantt for supporting racial quotas. The key line in the ad was this:
"Gantt supports Ted Kennedy's racial quota law, that makes the color of your skin more important than your qualifications."
But to read the Wikipedia's description of the ad you'd think that it was Helms, rather than Gantt, that was supporting a racist policy. NCdave (talk) 06:53, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Two weeks ago I added a citation request for one of the smears of Helms which was supported only by an accusation on the notoriously leftist FAIR web site. The accusation was that, "in one [WRAL] editorial he labeled the University of North Carolina (UNC) the 'University of Negroes and Communists.'" That claim stretches credulity. If there were documentation available for such a thing, you can bet that his U.S. Senate opponents would have dug it up and used it against him (in other than whisper campaigns). Since they did not do so, it is a safe bet that no such documentation exists. So I am not surprised that nobody answered the citation request.
Nevertheless, I tried hard to find a real source for that accusation. There just isn't any. There is neither a transcript or a recording of such a remark, and no accuser even gives a date on which he was claimed to have said it. The Wikipedia article referenced a FAIR article[6] with a laundry list of accusations of racism against various people. It makes the charge that Helms used that phrase, but does not give any indication of where or when he supposedly used it. However it cites the name of a newspaper as its source, and gives a date. Well, I found the newspaper, and the referenced article. The newspaper isn't in North Carolina, it is in West Virginia (where Helms' editorials were never aired)! What's more, the article wasn't even a news article, it was a 1995 Helms-bashing editorial, which said that Helms started out in politics as "a segregation-forever crusader" (which is transparently false), and also claimed that he had once "dubbed UNC the 'University of Negroes and Communists.'" And there the trail stops. The West Virginia newspaper gave no source for the accusation. If (as the Wikipedia article claimed) the remark was made on the air, in one of Helms' WRAL editorials, then it would have had to have been prior to 1973, which means that there is no source for the accusation dated within twenty-two years of the latest date when the remark could have been made!
Being unable to find anything remotely resembling a reliable source for the accusation, and no citation from a reliable source having been produced by anyone else, I've deleted the accusation. NCdave (talk) 10:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
There are about ten more outrageous and unsupported or poorly supported accusations against Helms in the "Controversies" section of this article. I went to a lot of trouble trying to track down the "University of Negroes and Communists" accusation. I do not have the time to do that with the others.
Most of them would be so politically damaging if they were provable that his Senate opponents would surely have used them against him; hence we can conclude with high confidence that they are unproven. However, for now, I've just flagged the section with a {{disputed-section}} tag. If anyone thinks they can dig up any documentation from reliable sources for any of those dubious accusations, please add the citations pronto, or at least discuss it here. NCdave (talk) 10:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
My apologies! After reviewing the history, I noticed that the "Controversies" section has already been through this process. The really embarrassing thing is that I was the one who flagged the section almost a month ago... and then forgot that I'd done so! After it had been flagged for about 9-1/2 days, someone else deleted the section, per WP:BLP. It stayed deleted for a couple of weeks, and then, two days ago, an anonymous editor (74.132.217.217) reinserted the whole section, minus the {{disputed-section}} tag.
So I'm just going to delete the section again. 74.132.217.217, whoever you are, please discuss it here on the Talk page before reinserting the section. There might well be some bullets from that section that are worth resurrecting, but if you think so then let's discuss them here, first, and try to reach a consensus about the wording and sourcing. Also, I suggest that you read WP:BLP. I think you'll find it helpful. NCdave (talk) 10:57, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Another anonymous editor (128.211.207.47) has reinserted this section, in defiance of WP:BLP, and without so much as a comment here on the Talk page. I'll revert it. NCdave (talk) 05:45, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
New user Potato_dude42 reinserted it again. I've reverted and left a message on his Talk page. NCdave (talk) 23:22, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

This entire wall of text does not appear to be a discussion but seems merely to be a conversation that one user is having with himself. In addtion, I do not really see the validity of most of the arguments made. The great majority of the points stated in the section were properly cited. Just because one may disagree with the source of the facts (i.e. FAIR) does not necessarily make the facts untrue. In any case, I am confused why the entire section was simply deleted, rather than just the specific points that were brought up. Thus, I am re-inserting this section into the article for now. --Potato dude42 (talk) 02:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

"One user having with himself?" I did not start this discussion section, and I did not initially delete the controversies section from the article. However, I did notice one obviously and provably false claim: that Claude Allen was hired after Helms supposedly sang or whistled "Dixie" in the presence of Carol Mosley-Braun. The version you inserted includes the equally false statement that Claude worked for Helms at the time of the incident:
"Helms once deeply offended a black colleague, Democratic Senator Carol Moseley-Braun of Illinois, by singing part of "Dixie" on a Capitol elevator... He then proceeded to sing the song about the good life during slavery to Mosely-Braun... At this time, his press secretary was Claude Allen, an African American.
Actually, Claude Allen quit working for Helms many years before Mosley-Braun was first elected to the Senate, and Dixie has nothing at all to do with slavery.
I tried very hard to track down a reliable source to document one of the many claims in this section, which appeared to have a source. It was a claim that was also made elsewhere in the article, and it cited an article in FAIR. But, as you can see, I tried to find where the accusation came from, and I was able to find nothing anywhere that resembled a reliable source. Neither the FAIR article nor the nasty little West Virginia newspaper editorial that it cited gave any indication of where or when this supposed remark by Helms was made. The claim that he said it in a WRAL editorial is completely unsourced. So what we are left with is an allegation that he said it somewhere, sometime, with no indication of where or when. What's more, if the allegation had been provable, it would have been pure gold for his Senate opponents, yet none of them used it in their multi-million dollar campaigns against him. Can you explain why? I think you know why as well as I do: despite their best efforts, they couldn't find any proof, because it most probably never happened.
WP:RS prohibits inserting unsourced or poorly sourced smears in biographies like this one, and you have reinserted many of them. If you really believe that one of those accusations is true and well-documented, please say which one, here, and show the documentation for it. We've been asking for seven weeks, and nobody has stepped forward with a reliable source for any of these accusations. I welcome you to this discussion, but please do not just reinsert the whole pack of lies again. Pick an accusation you think you can find reliable documentation for, and discuss it here, first. NCdave (talk) 14:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Forever Tarnished... A true symbol of Bigotry

I truly believe Jesse Helms legacy will be forever tarnished due to his Racist policies while in office. Wikipedia users should not read half-truths! The true nature of Sen. Helms actions while in office and warped ideals concerning other races and nationalities, should be brought to light in plain view.

The state of North Carolina should be ashamed to have a man like Jesse Helms hold a public office. He was in the same way of Sen.George Wallace, A true symbol of Bigotry! —Preceding unsigned comment added by GRANDEXTRAV (talk • contribs) 17:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Any you'd like to give examples of? --MartinUK (talk) 17:29, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
I've lived in NC for almost a quarter century, and I've never seen any examples of Sen. Helms' "bigotry," "racist policies," or "warped ideals." This sort of name-calling is a violation of Wikipedia's Talk page guidelines, which state, at the very beginning:
The purpose of a Wikipedia talk page is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or project page. Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views.
GRANDEXTRAV, if you have an encyclopedic contribution which you'd like to make to the article, by all means do so. But please try to keep your personal animosities out of it.
Also, please "sign" your Talk page comments with four tildes ("~~~~"), which will automatically add your name & the date/time. NCdave (talk) 19:20, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
GRANDEXTRAV, you have twice thrice inserted the unsupported statement, "He is also known as a symbol of Bigotry" into this article. Such name-calling violates of Wikipedia's Biographies_of_living_persons policy. I removed it the second time; someone else removed it the previous time. Please do not persist. NCdave (talk) 19:38, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
GRANDEXTRAV, reviewing the article history, I see that you have inserted this remark about ten times this month, including five times in 24 hours (which is called a "3RR violation"). Please acquaint yourself with WP:BLP and WP:3RR. Both are official Wikipedia policies, which you have violated. NCdave (talk) 20:33, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Sen. Helms's legacy will be forever tarnished and he is a true symbol of bigotry. As an aide to the 1950 Senate campaign of North Carolina Republican candidate Willis Smith, Helms helped create attack ads against Smith's opponent Frank Graham, including one ad which read: "White people, wake up before it is too late. Do you want Negroes working beside you, your wife and your daughters, in your mills and factories? Frank Graham favors mingling of the races."  :end quote

This is not a personal animosity, its a personal quest for the truth to be told. Not half-truths! The state of North Carolina should be ashamed to have had this man hold a public office.

Alvin A Harris —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.232.153.118 (talk) 21:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

In 1950 Helms was a 28 year old Democrat. Now, don't you feel a little bit embarrassed?
When you just uncritically accept every bit of unproven slander you encounter against someone you badly want to despise, to further stoke the fires of your hatred, you end up believing (and repeating) nonsense like that... which certainly doesn't belong in an encyclopedia article.
Also, please sign your comments with four tildes ("~~~~"). NCdave (talk) 05:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
FYI, GRANDEXTRAV was blocked for violating WP:3RR.The block is only 24h, but hopefully he's learned his lesson, and this will put a permanent end to his edit warring. Yilloslime (t) 05:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] anonymous paganism essay

An anonymous editor (152.13.148.211) has added a lengthy essay which ends with the conclusion:

"This ia an example of the still ever-present buring times for neo-Pagan groups and a reason why people must remain vigilant in order to safeguard their rights and freedoms. A.G.H."

I suppose that "A.G.H." might be the signature of whoever wrote it?

Anyhow, it is obviously misplaced in this biography, so I'm going to revert it. NCdave (talk) 20:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

That paganism essay was apparently inspired by an obscure failed amendment that Helms once proposed. While I would contend that it is insufficiently notable to be covered in this biography, a list of Helms' most notable successful legislative efforts would be a valuable addition. For instance, his crusade for a strong effort to combat HIV/AIDS in Africa, especially by the use of anti-virals to stop transmission of HIV from mother to newborn child, was his last big triumph (and it subsequently became a pet cause of President George W. Bush). What else belongs on such a list? NCdave (talk) 21:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] anonymous segragationist accusation

Another anonymous editor (218.158.40.155) has inserted this poorly sourced accusation:

"The campaign which went to a run-off was spearheaded by Helms who, true to his segregationist pedigree, circulated doctored pictures of Smith's opponent dancing with a black man entitled 'White People Wake Up' after which Smith became Senator for North Carolina"

Helms' "segregationist pedigree" was simply the fact that he grew up in the segregated South, which could be said of any Southerner his age, and he was a Democrat, which is certainly not sufficient justification for the accusation. There is no evidence that Helms doctored any photos or circulated any doctored photos, and the (then) 28 year-old Helms certainly did not "spearhead" the successful Democratic primary campaign of NC Bar Association President Willis Smith.

218.158.40.155, if you have evidence that Helms doctored photos or circulated doctored photos, please share it. For now, though, I'm deleting this attack on Helms from the article per WP:BLP. NCdave (talk) 21:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)