Talk:Jesse Capelli

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to actors and filmmakers on Wikipedia.
Pornography Portal
This article is part of WikiProject Pornography, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the project's importance scale.


Could someone please modify her name to "Jesse Capelli" - that's the name on her official website, so that should be the official spelling here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.116.189.198 (talk • contribs) 3:15, 2 February 2006

Since no one has voiced any opposition to such a move, I'll take it upon myself to do it. Consider it done. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 20:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please do not describe BLP cleanup as "vandalism"

Valrith has described BLP related cleanup of this article as vandalism in his edit summary. I have left this message at his talk page:

  • Excuse me, but both Doc glasgow and I were very clear in our edit summaries on the Jesse Capelli article that we were cleaning up information in response to a BLP concern. While you might disagree with us, please do not classify our edits as vandalism. I note that the entire article is unsourced; you might want to look into that. I wouldn't be counting on IMDB as a source, especially since her biography there has been changed in the last 24 hours.

Please don't mark these legitimate edits as vandalism. Risker 04:27, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

  • And, as I stated there, removing information that is referenced to reliable sources should qualify as vandalism. If you want to claim IMDb is not a reliable source, then a) you'll need to get consensus and b) that's going to hollow out a hell of a lot of articles. Until such consensus, this name should remain. Valrith 04:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
    • Please review the WP:BLP policy, especially this section[1]. Please also check out Doc glasgow's user page for some information on the reasons behind many of his edits. Risker 04:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Remove the personal information again. It needs to stay out of the article as this is a BLP and the information is poorly sourced and has been challenged. This is policy. Do not reinsert the content. Putting an unsourced tag on the article is not good enough. This article has no reliable sources for the content and really should be taken to a Stub if reliable sources are not forthcoming immediately. FloNight 23:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)