User talk:Jerzey jon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 ESPN.com's Fanboard 2 Speedy deletion of ESPN.com's Fanboard 3 Speedy deletion of Fantasy Fanatics Alliance 4 March 2008

[edit] ESPN.com's Fanboard

Regarding the article on ESPN.com's Fanboard, Please be aware that Wikipedia has policies that deal with the repeated reversion of edits. The policy is called WP:3RR, and refers to the idea that, if two editors have gone back and forth on an edit 3 times, it's time to stop editing and discuss the matter on the talk page. I see that you've removed two other "famous users" from the list in the article, but you provide no explaination as to why those names are not qualified to be on the list, but the ones you added are. There are no sources that set a criteria or provide data on why some names belong to the list, and others don't. Please discuss the matter on the talk page to provide some context. If the article is judged to be written from a non-neutral point of view, it may be deleted under Wikipedia's Deletion Policy. Hope this helps, ZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 03:57, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of ESPN.com's Fanboard

A tag has been placed on ESPN.com's Fanboard, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 14:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Fantasy Fanatics Alliance

A tag has been placed on Fantasy Fanatics Alliance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Redfarmer (talk) 22:31, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Redfarmer (talk) 22:33, 31 March 2008 (UTC)