User talk:Jerichohill817

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk to an admin about it. I can't block people as I'm only an editor. Wǐkǐɧérṃǐť(Talk) 20:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I just saw it on the page, i dont know any admins...--Jerichohill817 20:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

For the "Cash Back" column you just added to Casey Serin: you do need a reliable source for the amounts and transactions to back up these allegations. Blog sources won't cut it if you're accusing someone of a crime in a Wikipedia article. Saranary 20:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Aight, its on my honey-do list. I swear, this thing was a mess before...Let's take it down until I find something more reliable.

[edit] Casey Serin Reaction section.

Hey - we are all allowed to contribute. Don't believe "them" ... there's nothing wrong with putting in reaction to Snowflake's blog. Lot's of wikinazis out there I know! --PeterMarkSmith 12:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Linking to non-notable blogs in an attempt to drive traffic or Google stats is linkspamming, and it violates the vandalism policy. On a more practical level, which do you really think is more notable - Serin's adventures in quasilegal real-estate financing, or Serin's following in the blogosphere? Saranary 17:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

I think the wikipedia article with just the facts is pretty darn damning as is Peter.--Jerichohill817 17:58, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Bogus"?

Do you have a problem with all of my edits, or just with the removal of the "(which the Guide alleges was bogus)"? The latter is the only one I saw mention of on the talk page, and all of them were reverted.

I thought the phrase that I removed was awkward and unclear. What does it mean for a company to be "bogus"? That the company in some way misrepresented itself to the mortgage lender? To Serin? To someone else? The sentence should at least be clarified. 24.91.135.162 03:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

We can't intepret what the Scotsman Guide says, they simply say it was bogus. I *know* what they mean, because I've talked to the writer of the article, but since I cannot source that conversation, my hands are tied. Hence, it stays bogus. --Jerichohill817 13:10, 16 April 2007 (UTC)