User talk:Jerichi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Good Article Review; Jeri's Template

DO NOT TOUCH. PLEASE.

The "-" indicates that something needs fixing, the "=" indicates that it is of decent quality, and the "+" indicates that it is of great quality, but mind you, this doesn't mean it is perfect. If there is a "~" next to it, that means it is borderline with the next rating. "=~" would be borderline "+" and "=" for example.

  1. It is well written.
    a (Prose: ): Verdict:
    b (Structure: ): Verdict:
    c (MoS: ): Verdict:
    d (Jargon: ): Verdict:
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (References: ) Verdict:  :
    b (Inline citations: ): Verdict:
    c (Reliable: ): Verdict:
    d (OR: ) : Verdict:
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (Major aspects: ): Verdict:
    b (Focused: ): Verdict:
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (Fair representation: ): Verdict:
    b (All significant views: ): Verdict:
  5. It is stable.
    () Verdict:
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (Tagged and captioned: ): Verdict:
    b (Lack of images does not in itself exclude GA: ): Verdict:
    c (Non-free images have fair use rationales: ): Verdict:

[edit] Agricultural extension

I believe I addressed every issue in agricultural extension that you gave a "-". Other than that you suggested one section should be better referenced. The user who was the largest contributor to this page has agreed to do this, but it will not happen in the seven day hold period for GA review. If you get a chance, please have a look and see if you are comforable promoting the article now. ike9898 22:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

As of this moment, I cannot promote the article to GA status, as for I am required to wait for one more day before this article can be taken off hold. Since everything that I marked as "-" otherwise was dealt with, and there is no way to fix this by the time alloted, I see no reason not to promote it. If it was something more serious, I would have no choice, but since this is a minor and a "just to make sure" thing, I see no reason not to make it a good article. Jeri-kun 22:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
I doesn't really matter to me, but I think you're misunderstanding the "on hold" rules. I think the intention of the rule is that if you place an article on hold, you have to give the nominator (or other editors) at least two days to address critisisms before failing the article. I don't think the two day minimum applies to promoting the article. What purpose would that serve? But seriously, I don't care, and wouldn't get in an argument over this. Take it easy, ike9898 01:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You helped choose Black hole as this week's WP:ACID winner

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Black hole was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

AzaBot 01:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Your GA nomination of Crawdaunt

The article Crawdaunt you nominated as a good article has passed , see Talk:Crawdaunt for eventual comments about the article. Good luck in future nominations. Funpika 00:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I award a barnstar on your user page

This is for making Snorunt a GA. Vikrant Phadkay 15:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, thanks. That was quite unexpected, but I'm flattered. Jerichi~Profile~Talk~ 00:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:POKE is doing some housecleaning

This notice is to inform you that because many people have added their names to Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon#Participants but do not seem to be active, all names are being deleted in an effort to find out who is still truly interested in the project. All you have to do is re-add your name if you'd still like to be considered a member of WP:POKE. Any questions, you can contact me on my talk page. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 17:41, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You helped choose Poverty as this week's WP:ACID winner

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Poverty was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

Zginder (talk) (Contrib) 22:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You helped choose Dwarf planet as this week's WP:ACID winner

 Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Dwarf planet was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

Zginder (talk) (Contrib) 02:22, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:SnoruntTGCrubysapphire.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SnoruntTGCrubysapphire.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:10, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Featured sounds

I noticed that you have participated in Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates in the past. There are now two candidates and the project appears to be abandoned. If you could look at the candidates and vote it would be appreciated. Zginder (talk) (Contrib) 00:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon

The list of participants of the Pokémon WikiProject is quite sizable, however, there is no way to determine which of whom are active contributors to that project. All participants in the list have been moved to Inactive. If you consider yourself to be an active member of the Pokémon WikiProject, please go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon#Participants and move your username to the Active section. Thank you. Useight (talk) 23:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)