User talk:JeremyA

Welcome to my talk page. Please add new topics to the bottom of the page and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Rambo IV poster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rambo IV poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 07:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Location maps

Would you consider dual-licensing your contributions to {{Location map}} and related templates under the cc-by 2.5 license so i could use them on the english wikinews? Happy editing. Bawolff 00:52, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for responding. No, cc-by-sa-2.0 is not compatible with cc-by 2.5. Thanks anyways, and happy editing.

p.s. have you noticed the new message dialog is more yellowy then it used to be? Bawolff 01:09, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chicago Landmark WP:FLC

You helped us at WP:CHICOTW create and improve List of Chicago Landmarks. This week we have nominated it at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Chicago Landmarks. Feel free to make comments about its candidacy or to come by and help respond to the comments of others. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 00:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Space music

Hi. It seems like you have an interest in ambient music. I wonder if you wouldn't mind taking a look at Space music when you get a chance. There is currently an ongoing issue there with one editor trying to suggest that space music is not a genre of ambient - and the discussion would certainly benefit from outside opinions by knowledgeable parties. --Gene_poole 07:18, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] More help needed

If you have been following along at WP:FLC#List_of_Chicago_Landmarks you know we need help creating stubs for the List to make it a more useful list and help it achieve WP:FLC status. Since I reminded people of this 7 stubs have been created. We need about 40 more to be safe although we may have a successful candidacy with the article as it stands.

Some of you may also be following the success of WP:CHICOTW at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/COTW/Good Articles. For the last 4 weeks no one has been very active. Thus, I am fearful that Historic Michigan Boulevard District, Harold Washington Cultural Center, Crown Fountain, & Art Institute of Chicago Building will all fail at WP:GAC when their turns come up. Also, Magnificent Mile did not experience the collaborative spirit. Our reputation as a successful collaboration is at stake. In addition to making stubs for the FLC we need your contribution to our collaborations. I am sorry to pull you away from whatever other wikipleasures you may be experiencing, but we need your help. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 16:59, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Request

You may have noticed that LJS and the good capt have settled their differences in the face of an external threat, leading to various squabbles amongst WikiSheff pages, Tinsley Viaduct (cf the coords subpage) being the first one with various spin-offs such as Hicks Building, Meersbrook, 4 or 5 in all. I asked here for advice; there is also an RfA here. I wondered whether you perceive any disruption and/or edit warring; and if so whether you might consider banning him from either the specific pages or all pages within WikiSheff. (He does good work when he's not arguing.) -- roundhouse0 22:39, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Zoo-movie.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Zoo-movie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:18, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sheffield - Demography

Hello again JeremyA, I hope all is well.

On the Sheffield article (which I know you've personally worked very hard on), would you object to the expansion of the "Demography" sub-section with a "comparison table" (see Manchester for an example) and it being given a full "section" status.

My logic is that whilst Demography is part of Geography, so really is Economy, Transport, Governance etc. And the new WP:UKCITIES guidelines ask for a seperate section because the wider WP:CITIES asks for this (often for FA standard), and these were built from consensus from a large communal editor base. I'd also like to see it have its own section on Demography because Sheffield is often used as THE example when it comes to writing settlements.

I will try to work on a comparison table, but do let me know your thoughts. Jza84 00:43, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

I've added some tables to the article - I think they are very useful to the article and hope they are well received. Jza84 00:49, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi Jza84. Sorry Jeremy for using your discussion page to speak to Jza but wanted to congratulate him and you for the demogrphy section of the Sheffield article. I was looking at the section header and feared it'd be yet more anti-Sheffield bias but was pleased to see a truly neutral yet favorable section on the demography of Sheffield. I would like to however, place reservations on some of the wordings such as white which might benefit from an update to Caucasian if it this precise term that is meant. Once again good work and why not create Demography of Sheffield as it has been done for the economy, history and several others. Regards, Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 11:09, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

My inclination is to go with whatever terminology the source uses. It is unclear to me whether or not the term white, as used by the 2001 census, is directly interchangeable with caucasian. Demography of Sheffield could be a redirect to People of Sheffield (or vice versa), although I think that People of Sheffield could do with a major rewrite (I made a half-hearted attempt to fix it back in 2006). —Jeremy (talk) 14:40, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

I was only mildly concerned by the state of political correctness we live in where many racial names are no longer used so as to not offend anyone, although white could encompass people originary from say the mediterranean, Caucasian is the PC term I understand (I hope I'm not digging a hole here). People of Sheffield doesn't seem to fit with the rest of the Sheffield articles, what with Geography, History, Tranport, it seemed People was out of place/character. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 10:41, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mark Gasser

I have spent a lot of time researching this pianist. The source was a reliable one and is published by Sheffield City Council. I am currently writing this from Australia. It seems ludicrous that you have now said that this is an unreliable article and have said there are no sources. Gasser is one of the most important pianists of his generation and there are links to many reviews from major newspapers worldwide in the review section. I would appreciate it if you restore my work as there is no conflict here.

kind regards

Bobby Fred

[edit] mark gasser

Hi Jeremy,

He is obviously amongst the most respected alumni as he is a fellow of both institutes and gained the highest ever marks in the history of the Birmingham Conservatoire (see CQCM website.

He is world renowned and has had many articles written about him in every major paper going. If you object to the word I shall remove it - however judging from the reviews (which ARE needed) this could not be argued otherwise.

Please let me know what you think

cheers

[edit] mark gasser

the reviews should count as references as this is how living performers achieve their name. The independent is about the longest piece of music ever written. On the CQCM website it tells of how Gasser received standing ovations at Carnegie Hall, The Wigmore Hall (UK) and Melbourne town hall etc - all backed up in the reviews. I think this is enough to justify the comments. I have removed the other words as they are unimportant.

cheers

P>S The reviews are references to the calibre of a living artist and are therfore valid.

[edit] Blocks

Hi just to let you know, as the person who blocked IP user 81.132.161.139, that they appear to be back again, very quickly doing the same vandalism o England and Sport Stacking this time using this anon IP address - 79.66.43.211 which whilst only two edits this far, are the same type as the prevbious blocked user. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 00:40, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Never mind, whilst I was typing the above out you were blocking them!! ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 00:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] James Underwood

Thank you very much for sorting out the references. ♦Part♦·Talk part 18:04, 27 July 2007 (UTC) PS. I have been struggling to get an appropriate picture - they keep getting deleted. Surely fair use of living person is acceptable. part 18:07, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Imagenes borradas/Deleted images (Trasgu)

¿Qué estás haciendo? Todas las imágenes que he subido han sido obtenidas de páginas con la category de Copyleft así que no te dediques a tildarlas de violación de los derechos de autor porque eso es falso.

[edit] Chicago Meetup

I am not sure if you live in Chicagoland. If not I apologize for the following message. I hope the time and place for the Chicago Meetup are convenient. Your reply would be appreciated.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 19:36, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for coming out. I was looking at Sheffield. What software do you need to "read" a .ogg file? How do you create one? I forgot to remind you to take a look at WP:CHIASSESS#Current_Top-importance_Candidates and vote if you get a chance.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 15:40, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Jeremy, Please feel free to leave me a message if you feel I can help out on some need. I don't respond to e-mail on a regular basis, but I will respond to a message from a wikipedian that I am acquainted with. --Ancheta Wis 03:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template:GBvosi

I noticed your comment at Template talk:GBvosi regarding the breakage in that template. I thought you might be interested to know that the template has been brought back to life so a direct coordinate link can be given to the www.old-maps.co.uk site once again. --DavidCane 23:57, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Whilst it is possible to zoom in on the 1:10,560 scale images once one's at the old-maps site, I haven't found a way of going directly to a enlargement in the way that GBvoss did. I have this evening gone through all the articles that used the old GBvoss template (there were only eleven) and modified them to use GBvosi. I have also redirected GBvoss to point at GBvosi.

I am also hoping that it might be possible to specify links to one of the later maps shown across the bottom of the screen. I'm going to try and decipher the java script behind the page to see if there might be any clues there as to if this is possible. --DavidCane 00:49, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] voting and ogg

Did you produce the .ogg file at Sheffield? I should mention that you only placed 3 of the 4 votes you are entitled to for Top-Importance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyTheTiger (talk • contribs) 00:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for evaluating the criteria so seriously as to abstain on a fourht vote.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 15:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		In recognition of your fine Anti-vandal efforts, I award you this barnstar. Keep up the great work! Lradrama 18:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Scott Reed

Curious to know why you deleted this? Your explanation doesn't include my verifiable credits for several top comics publishers, in books that have been published world-wide. There are also various instances in Wikipedia where my name is linked from, I think. Both of these should be enough to confirm notability?

SR 9/06/07 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Websbestcomics (talk • contribs) 18:14, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] HISTORY OF NORTH YORKSHIRE

---

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.252.153 (talk) 17:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] time-lapse

I have read the rules, which one exactly is being broken? And isn't Wikipedia whatever we make it? How is what is being done hurting you and who made you the boss of Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.214.8.97 (talk) 23:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Time Lapse 2

What is wrong with having a few links up there? Have you actually looked at the links that you keep removing? I don't think any of them violate "the rules". I think it would be good for a page about time lapse photography to have to links to some examples of time lapse photography, don't you think? Oh and just to clarify, I am not adding the links, merely undoing the removal.

[edit] Time Lapse 3

I feel that the two examples of time lapse photography on the page are quite poor and uninteresting, and I when I think of time lapse photography I certainly don't think of a flower opening nor a piece of fruit rotting. Even the page states other examples of time lapse photography, such as: cloudscapes and celestial motion, evolution of a construction project and people in the city. You seems fairly adamant at removing all of the external links on the page, why don't you remove the ones in the "HDR Time-lapse" section? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.214.8.97 (talk) 02:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Zoo-movie.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Zoo-movie.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jackaranga 21:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Graphic design question

Hello again JeremyA! I hope all is well.

As the title suggests, I have a question of a graphic design nature which I hope you can help with... I came across your beautifully rendered Sheffield Urban Area map and wondered how exactly you'd produced the railways? Is it done in Adobe Illustrator? I presume its a bespoke brush you've made? It'd be great if I could obtain this knowledge and roll it out for the entire country's infobox map system! Hope you can help, -- Jza84 · (talk) 22:51, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:Zipzor

Just noticed you gave him a final warning, well, he's at it again, see his contributions, he just created an attack page. This is Zanusi 12:55, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Bothtones7

Thanks for the block. I'm 99% certain that he's actually a sock of User:Roadcrusher (see here), although because he had started some time after the last puppet was blocked, I was going to take a chance to see if there has been any improvement. Apparently not. Kelvinc (talk) 03:51, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Zenith88

Why has the article on Fulwood village, Yorkshire been removed? It is quite different to other Sheffield 'districts,' having a very keen sense of its own separate identity from the city of Sheffield itself. It is wrong to lump it together with Sheffield suburbs when it is a distinct place in its own right. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.32.126.14 (talk) 15:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] CTA infobox

Just a quick note - you only need to set one param per line, otherwise you'll get multiple bars. I've changed Argyle (CTA) and Berwyn (CTA) to reflect this. Best, Mackensen (talk) 02:19, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Lise Anne Couture + Hani Rashid.jpg

Hey, Jeremy - I dropped you a note at Commons about the above image. I think it's odd that you would strike through the license provided by the uploader, then drop a standard warning on their talk page that the image has no license. (No need to reply here if you reply at Commons, I watchlisted your talk page there.) Videmus Omnia ^Talk 15:53, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merry Christmas

[edit] Category:Top-importance Chicago articles

We are going to go through another round of consideration for Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. Last August your votes helped us decide our last round of promotions. Please consider the articles at WT:CHIASSESS and voice your opinion on whether they should be on the ballot near the end of January when we are considering our next round of promotions.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 02:58, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

On 3 January 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chicago and South Side Rapid Transit Railroad, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cheers, Daniel 08:37, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] QR Code external links

Hi, I noticed that you removed some unnecessary external links in the qrcode page. I agree some of them were superfluos but I think it's very usefull to have links to source code. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.140.6.121 (talk) 21:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Maybe, although of very limited use to a general audience. Given the amount of spam that article gets I try to keep the number of external links to a minimum using the guidelines at WP:EL. People wanting lots of links will use the search engine or directory of their choice anyway.—Jeremy (talk) 22:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] List of Chicago Landmarks

I am revising List of Chicago Landmarks for new designations since July 2003. You will see many redlinks that need articles if we want to retain WP:FL status. For details of the update that is underway see the talk page. Please help out and create some articles.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 04:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] W Tinsley\Tinsley W

Can i direct you to Talk:West Tinsley railway station as there is some confusion over the name...? Simply south (talk) 00:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] QR Codes

I see you have protected the page and stated it was receiving vandalism from multiple sources. The alleged vandalism is a link to a very popular news site about 2d bar codes. Shouldn't it have struck you as important enough to investigate if you realized that so many different people were posting this relevant link. Meanwhile, you maintain that the link to another news article is indeed worthy. What is your agenda here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by CChungg (talk • contribs) 19:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

CChungg - Please take a look at WP:EL (and also please sign your comments). The repeatedly arising site in question isn't a specific article on the topic in question, but rather a blog able to be given to the whim of future content changes without the moderation of wiki editors. Additionally, since you've thrown the first snide bit here, i have to ask what the agenda is for a person who's only two wiki contributions have been the restoration of repeatedly removed external sites. Quaeler (talk) 22:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

My agenda is make current information available to everyone about this exciting technology. By locking the article, you've decided what content is notable and have decided that only a blog entry written by a semi-credible source two years ago is the only outside news source. Also, seeing as www.lunaQR.com and Luna based out of Toronto are the ones bringing this technology to North America, with the backing of Microsoft amongst others, it would seem very relevant to link to their non commercial website which in fact does not sell anything, but is simply an educational resource and provides a free online QR code generator that is even used as an example in this discussion page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CChungg (talk • contribs) —Preceding comment was added at 01:41, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

You clearly have an agenda then, as the only edits you make are in the interest of making links related to this Luna development company. (QR Codes and Microsoft Dynamics) Quaeler (talk) 08:27, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

You ask what my agenda is here... I am helping to write an encyclopedia. On the other hand you appear to be trying to promote a blog--Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a directory. The other news article can go too, I would never have reverted its removal--I have only ever reverted when it was replaced with a blog link. —Jeremy (talk) 13:57, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

So remove it then and replace it with some relevant references to the information contained within this article. There is a single reference to Denso Wave and nothing more. Where did the rest of this information come from? --CChungg (talk) 19:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kinzie Street railroad bridge

Congratulations on an interesting article about this important railroad bridge. It looks like it is making it to DYK. I would like to question its claim, though, that it was the longest and heaviest bascule bridge when it opened. See the comments on the article's talk page. Thanks. Truthanado (talk) 00:47, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Your explanation on the article's talk page and on my talk page sounds good to me. Thanks. Truthanado (talk) 23:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Indepence

I am from Serbia and i think thet any text wich used to decribe my country are must be deleted.In constitusion of wikipeda ,i have writes to protect human lowes.You contine to breake this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99lava (talk • contribs) 15:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ultimate Guitar Archive

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Ultimate Guitar Archive, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 10:59, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Crookes sandbox article

For some reason (I suspect because of the deleted templates that you were using in your infobox), this work in progress article in your sandbox (User:JeremyA/Sandbox/Crookes) was causing it to show up as WP:CSD candidate. Since there was no tag on the article, it was obviously an error. Anyway, I ended up commenting out the infobox, and now it no longer shows up in CSD. Hope you don't mind, but I didn't want the article accidentally deleted altogether. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 04:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] CTA template

The the 'px' just needs to be removed from the image_size parameter (see [1]). Mackensen (talk) 02:36, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

• See Wikipedia:ClickFix. Perhaps not so strange...Mackensen (talk) 02:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• And now that we've been through all that I've patched the templates so it'll never happen again ;). Mackensen (talk) 03:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Outline Map

Hi there, I have noticed your inclusion of this outline map in the Bramall Lane article and I was wondering whether you could help me to create a similar one for Leeds for use in the Elland Road article. Cheers, Kaboooz LUFC ^T_C 10:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. That's the idea, but I think It'd be better with the stadium's location within a map of Leeds with UK. I just didn't know how to get a map of Leeds as you have for Sheffield and, having done that, how to pinpoint the location of the stadium. Kaboooz LUFC ^T_C 19:21, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I think that's beyond me, but it would be great if you could create one at some stage. You don't need to do it right away though, of course – I'm sure you've got better things to do. Thanks for the offer though, Kaboooz LUFC ^T_C 19:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] External Link

J: I'm writing on behalf of The Jewish Museum. Recently you removed numerous links I had posted from several artist pages. In your comments to me you asked that I review the External Link policy. Having done so, it seems that I need to ask editors to post my institution's recommended links. If I proceed this way, what is the estimated time frame? Thejewishmuseum (talk) 19:11, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - May 2008

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome! The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter Issue I - May 2008 Got any suggestions? — Add them here Project News One of the new aims of the project was to produce a monthly newsletter to be circulated to members. This is it! Priorities are still being discussed; please join in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire Currently there are nine Yorkshire featured articles: Sheffield • History of Sheffield • Sheffield Wednesday F.C. • York City F.C. • M62 motorway • Henry Moore • George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore • Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. • Valley Parade There are also seven featured lists: List of York City F.C. Clubmen of the Year • List of York City F.C. managers • List of York City F.C. players • York City F.C. seasons • Bradford City A.F.C. seasons • List of York City F.C. statistics and records • Leeds United A.F.C. seasons Thank you and well done to all those who contributed. Kingston upon Hull was nominated for GA Status on April 28th WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (3343 on April 27th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs. WP:YORKS is lacking in the area of GAs and falls well behind WP:LONDON. This topic was at the front of the new aims discussion and is an important issue for WP:YORKS. As mentioned above, new aims have been decided. See the right hand column for more details. Member News There are now 45 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the 2 new members that have joined us since March: Jetsetradio (talk · contribs) Paulrach (talk · contribs) No users left the WikiProject this month, but the list may need trimming to account for the one user who was permanently blocked and one who seems not to exist. There are also several who have not contributed to Wikipedia for some months. The format of the member list has been altered to: allow easier editing for new members assist members to communicate more easily (by including members talk pages) allow member to keep up to date with each other's contributions Thanks The Yorkshire Portal continues to be maintained by User:Kaly99. Many thanks. A big "thank you" to all the editors who help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed. Written by User:Harkey Lodger • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View New Aims After discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire. Specific aims for the project are:- To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles To recruit more active editors To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members The top priority articles that have been identified to date and their current ratings are as follows - Bradford - B East Riding of Yorkshire - B Henry Moore - FA - but would be demoted for lack of references if reviewed Kingston upon Hull - B - informal Peer review comments on talk page Leeds - B North Yorkshire - Start Ripon - B Sheffield - FA South Yorkshire - Start Wakefield - Start West Yorkshire - Start William Wilberforce - GA - actively being worked on for FAC York - B Yorkshire - B Yorkshire and the Humber - Start The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first. Don't Forget... Monitor Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism can be removed as quickly as possible. Images! There is a shortage of good images in Yorkshire related articles, particularly on pages about smaller settlements. A good place to start would be the requested photographs category but please remember that there are many articles not within this category that have the same need. Assessment "Assess and review Assessment of Yorkshire related articles has been brought up to date recently, but needs constant maintenance. Last but not Least... Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is in permanent need of attention. Please take a look and see what you can do.

Delivered May 2008 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add two *'s by your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 10:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago)

I thought I would mention to you that since our agreement a long time ago to limit the number of photos in Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago), several new templates have been created to accommodate many photos in the text of articles. I have used {{multiple image}} to include several more images than we had previously agreed in the development and construction sections. I just renominated the article at WP:GAC with all the photos.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 23:07, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Ntd

A template you created, Template:Ntd, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. Bryan Derksen (talk) 04:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Top Importance Chicago Articles

If you want to help me choose Category:Top-importance Chicago articles, come comment at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago/Assessment#Current_Top-importance_Candidates by June 5th.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 13:42, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Yorkshire - June 2008 Newsletter

The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter

Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome! The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter Issue 2 - June 2008 May issue Got any suggestions? — Add them here Project News Welcome to the second WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter. Priorities are still being discussed; please join in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire Currently there are ten Yorkshire featured articles: Sheffield • History of Sheffield • Sheffield Wednesday F.C. • York City F.C. • M62 motorway • Henry Moore • George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore • Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. • Valley Parade • Caedmon There are also seven featured lists: List of York City F.C. Clubmen of the Year • List of York City F.C. managers • List of York City F.C. players • York City F.C. seasons • Bradford City A.F.C. seasons • List of York City F.C. statistics and records • Leeds United A.F.C. seasons Thank you and well done to all those who contributed. Lealholm was nominated for GA Status on May 1st and has just received the review comments Last of the Summer Wine proposed at FAC on May 22nd History of Bradford City A.F.C. on peer review since May 29th WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 3343 last month to 3509 on May 28th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs. WP:YORKS is lacking in the area of GAs and falls well behind WP:LONDON. This topic was at the front of the new aims discussion and is an important issue for WP:YORKS. As mentioned above, new aims have been decided. See the right hand column for more details. Member News There are now 45 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the 4 new members that have joined us since the May newsletter: ObscureFruits (talk · contribs) Dr Greg (talk · contribs) Johnbibby (talk · contribs) Ahjet (talk · contribs) No users left the WikiProject this month, but the list has been trimmed to account for the one user who was permanently blocked and one who seems not to exist. There are also several who have not contributed to Wikipedia for some months. However it is the exam season :-) Retiono Virginian (talk · contribs) has been permanently blocked and Malcolm Bryant (talk · contribs) does not seem to have registered on Wikipedia.(Let me know if I am wrong.) Last month the format of the member list was altered to: allow easier editing for new members assist members to communicate more easily (by including members talk pages) allow members to keep up to date with each other's contributions It had to be changed again before the May Newsletter went out to allow easier, more efficient, circulation by the ENewsBot. The Bot worked like magic last month but slightly complicated the signing up process, particularly for novice users. Thanks The Yorkshire Portal continues to be maintained by User:Kaly99 once again, thank you. There has been a number of suggestions on the ToDo list and this has been kept up to date too. The Northallerton article has been greatly expanded by User:Yorkshiresky in the last month. The football and rugby editors have to be congratulated for keeping abreast of most. if not all, of the top clubs. User:Cyberdemon007 has made a lot of edits to North Yorkshire settlement infoboxes. Thank you. There have been more WikiProkject Yorkshire editors on vandal patrol on watchlist , just lately. Thanks it's really good to know that you have others in support. A big "thank you" to all the editors who help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed. If you patrol the recent changes regularly you "get to know" the editors and their specialities quite well. Written by User:Harkey Lodger • Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View New Aims After discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire. Specific aims for the project are:- To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles To recruit more active editors To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members The top priority articles that have been identified to date and their current ratings are as follows - Bradford - B - some tidying up was done earlier in the month but much still to do. East Riding of Yorkshire - B - See comments page Henry Moore - FA - but would be demoted for lack of references if reviewed. Kingston upon Hull - B - informal Peer review comments on talk page. Has gone to WP:GA review and is awaiting result. Leeds - B -has been really improved lately but suffers from ISP edits. Well done to editors who keep on top of them. North Yorkshire - Start Ripon - B - See comments page Sheffield - FA -Wikipedia:WikiProject Sheffield seem to be keeping an eye on this, their flagship article. South Yorkshire - Start Wakefield - Start West Yorkshire - Start William Wilberforce - GA - actively being worked on for FAC York - B - Main problems are lack of references and the lists, also the external links section would need a major prune before a GA review.Maybe ask for peer review when these are done? Bath, Somerset is an FA and a good role model. Yorkshire - B - see talk page for discussions on this. Yorkshire and the Humber - Start. The article has been reorganised and expanded (some sections with no text are there on the source page but are commented out at the moment). It could do with more citations. The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first. Don't Forget... Monitor Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism can be removed as quickly as possible. Images! There is a shortage of good images in Yorkshire related articles, particularly on pages about smaller settlements. A good place to start would be the requested photographs category but please remember that there are many articles not within this category that have the same need. A good old holiday picture of The Spa, Bridlington would be a useful addition to the article. Assessment "Assess and review Assessment of Yorkshire related articles has been brought up to date recently, but needs constant maintenance. Last but not Least... Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is in permanent need of attention. Please take a look and see what you can do. One small edit each session would make a big difference. Yorkshire articles Importance Top High Mid Low Total Quality FA 2 6 2 10 FL 7 7 GA 1 5 5 4 15 B 7 35 84 43 169 Start 5 35 284 523 847 Stub 10 170 2294 2474 List 2 10 42 54 Assessed 15 87 559 2915 3576 Total 15 87 559 2915 3576

Delivered June 2008 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add two *'s by your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GAR debate on buildings under construction

You are an editor of Chicago Spire with at least 10 edits on the article. There is currently a debate regarding the propriety of whether buildings under construction should be eligible to be GAs at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago)/1.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:24, 5 June 2008 (UTC)