Talk:Jerome Avenue

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jerome Avenue was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: November 11, 2007

	NYC Portal This article is part of WikiProject New York City, an effort to create, expand, and improve New York City-related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Bulletin: The next New York City meetup is Sunday June 1st.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics	New York State routes
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article needs a map. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

	This article is within the scope of the U.S. Streets WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to streets in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

A fact from Jerome Avenue appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on November 12, 2007.

[edit] GA review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Some of the major issues were that it was poorly written in the lead and street description. The subway section and image don't have much to do with the article. When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far. —JA10 Talk • Contribs