User talk:Jentri

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Speedy deletion of Danh Quach

A tag has been placed on Danh Quach requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Noah 06:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Danh Quach

The page in question failed to assert any notability; ergo, I felt it eligible under CSD A7. Furthermore, you did not mention that he was a "pioneer" for Little Saigon, and if you expanded upon that, as well as including commentary on this from independent, reliable, verifiable, sources, then I believe it can pass WP:BIO. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 07:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi --- sorry to see that the article you started got deleted. I restarted it again: see Danh Quach. Basically, the requirement for new biographical articles about living people is that they point to some newspaper articles, books, or other reliable sources about the person. That helps other editors to verify the facts in the article --- for legal and moral reasons, we have to be very careful about what we say about living people. Because of this, articles which don't cite any sources will end up being removed. Anyway, this seems like an article we need, so I hope you can help expand it. If you have any further comments, please leave them at Talk:Danh Quach. Thanks, cab (talk) 08:05, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the sources; hard to find when the newspaper reporters put the name in all different orders. I wrote a short paragraph about the controversy at the shopping centre. Cheers, cab (talk) 10:05, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Editing User talk:Sephiroth BCR (comment)

A tag has been placed on Editing User talk:Sephiroth BCR (comment) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DJBullfish (talk) 08:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 10:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thank you--Jentri (talk) 10:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)