User talk:Jennyplus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 License tagging for Image:10 murder suspects.jpg
2 Image tagging for Image:John McNally (Emmerdale).png
3 Major Incidents In Emmerdale
4 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Matthew King.png
5 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bob Hope.png
6 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Carl King.png
7 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:David Brown.jpg
8 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Woolpack.jpg
9 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Terry Woods.png
10 Image copyright problem with Image:Shane Doyle.jpg
11 Proposed deletion of Phyllis Acaster

[edit] License tagging for Image:10 murder suspects.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:10 murder suspects.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:John McNally (Emmerdale).png

Thanks for uploading Image:John McNally (Emmerdale).png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Major Incidents In Emmerdale

Hi, i see you've reverted my edit to the Major Incindents in Emmedale page, the reasons it was edited and put into a new article was becase the current page is too long, with future events happning in Emmerdale, the page will take a heck of a long time to load using Dial Up. I myself use broadband and the page still takes ages to load. Also, as this storyline aain is still progressing it's quantity is going to increase, thus taking up even more space on the page.

You an view the new article here Tom_King_Murder_Emmerdale

I will not revert these changes back until i hear a response from you. Thenthornthing 13:38, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Matthew King.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Matthew King.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:01, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bob Hope.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Bob Hope.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Carl King.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Carl King.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:David Brown.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:David Brown.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Woolpack.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Woolpack.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Terry Woods.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Terry Woods.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Shane Doyle.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Shane Doyle.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed deletion of Phyllis Acaster

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Phyllis Acaster, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Magioladitis (talk) 06:59, 6 May 2008 (UTC)