User talk:Jenniferarmor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

({hang on}) The article was not complete when posted. There is additional information regarding the history of circulation auditing, the types of techniques employed at the beginning of circulation auditing used to ensure objectivity and information about the founder who is rather unique in the fact that she started a woman-owned business for the very male-dominated field of publishing in the 1950s. In addition, articles about the Audit Bureau of Circulation (ABC) and BPA Worldwide are posted that offer information on their specific type of ciculation auditing. Neither audit free distribution publications which is unique to Verified Audit Circulation. >Jennifer Armor

[edit] Speedy deletion of Verified Audit Circulation

A tag has been placed on Verified Audit Circulation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Mrand ^T-C 23:05, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Article problems

If there is not an article on circulation auditing, I would suggest you start there. The tone and content of the article you did post made it clearly an ad for that firm. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)