User talk:Jennica/Archive Jun 2007

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Aloha

Jennica, please do not remove okina and kahako from words of the Hawaiian language as you did on Hoku. The word Oahu, is actually Oʻahu. The upside apostaphe, aka 'okina', is supposed to be there. If you continue to remove such dictoral markings from words of the Hawaiian language, you will be reported to the administrinators and a request will be submitted to block you making changes. Mahalo ā nui loa i kou kōkua! -- Kanaka maoli i puuwai 19:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC) Feel free to discuss this with me on my talk page

No problem. If it was not intentional, then you have nothing to worry about. Aloha! Kanaka maoli i puuwai 00:17, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Jennica/Archive Jun 2007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karm a fist 21:26, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:3462247303.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:3462247303.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:04, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit summary

Hi Jennn and thanks for your contributions. Please try to use an edit summary as much as you can; it helps other people to understand what you're doing. I almost reverted your recent Paris Hilton edit because I initially thought you were just deleting content instead of moving it. -SpuriousQ 22:49, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What???

Um... Why are you asking if I know English well?Pendo 4 23:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Pendo 4

[edit] Oh...

I type really fast and I don'y see spelling errors because I am in a hurry. If i typed slow yeah I can spell right.Pendo 4 02:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Pendo 4

[edit] List of people with epilepsy

Thanks for trying to fix the vandalism. I've reverted the page back to Jan 30 to get rid of some you didn't spot. It is easier just to use the history and go back to the last good page, than to try to unpick it all. Cheers, Colin°^Talk 17:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Last.fm

Hi, you recently changed the spelling of 'programme' to the American word 'program'. As the article is about an English based website, I have changed it back. (see the remarks on English usage in Program (management)Jud 22:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry, just me being pedantic! :)Jud 23:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tori

Hey Jennica. Recently, I had seen a similar tracklist and deleted it, and then I saw an obviously ridiculous and false track list that I again deleted. Then I went to UNDENTED.COM, which is a site I trust, and they confirmed this track list, though they didn't list their "reliable source." Laikalynx 03:57, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

So how about I put it back? THX Laikalynx 04:17, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Andy Hurley

Would you please explain why you're suggesting that the apparent vandalism-only account 82.38.3.151 is a sockpuppet of my account? Anthony Rupert 03:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wow

You were born a day before me. How cool is that? — Sam 02:48, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Harry Potter

Hi, I saw that you are replacing the citation templates such as {{cite web}} and {{cite news}} with direct URLs. May I ask why? --Kimon^talk 15:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Actually, it was only a single reference that was screwing everything up. See this where reference #49 does not have its template properly closed. --Kimon^talk 18:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Oops

My mistake, I thought you were putting that all-caps stuff in the text. I see it was a reference title. Sorry! NawlinWiki 00:43, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits to Carnage (comics)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Jennica! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bmembers\.aol\.com\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 20:47, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and will be removed. Thanks. Shadowbot 20:51, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Auckland

Hello Jennica. I had to revert the reference you gave for immigration to Auckland, because you used a copy of the very same Wikipedia article mirrorred on another site. Even said so at the bottom of said webpage. Obviously, your edit was in good faith, and I certainly know its pretty frustrating sometimes when a Google search in the first 10 links turns up 5 out of 10 Wikipedia copies... but please pay attention to this in the future. Happy editing, MadMaxDog 05:07, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Responded on my page to your response there. MadMaxDog 15:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tupac Shakur edits

I noticed you made edits to correct the citations in the Tupac Shakur article. Before you do too many, you might want to look back in the history. There are older versions of the article that have nearly all of the references properly cited using {{cite}} tags already. Those references were also reviewed for accuracy and expanded to include complete information (like ISBN's, publishers, etc.) The versions with {{cite}} tags were rolled back by another user, however. I'd hate to see you waste your time re-doing a bunch of work that already exists in the history for the article. The lack of proper {{cite}} tags in the current version was one of the many reasons that reviewers recently voted to remove Tupac Shakur from Good Article status. Good luck! SqlPac 04:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

This is a response to your response on my talk page: I know you were just fixing citations, but I just wanted to point out to you that it's already been done (it's in the history for the article). If you wanted to save yourself some time and effort, you could copy and paste the {{cite}} tags from the older version of the article (it's from maybe a month or so ago), which contains complete and verified references in proper cite tags. Just a suggestion :) Thanks. SqlPac 04:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

... discospinster _talk 11:55, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Advice needed

I know you've edited the Edgar Allan Poe page a few times. I was wondering if you have an opinion on a new template / author navigation box. The original is clean and simple, the new version is a bit clunky and possibly larger than it needs to be. Feel free to respond on my talk page or on the EAP talk page. Template:Edgar Allan Poe vs. User:Midnightdreary/test -Midnightdreary 00:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Haywoode-Youd-Better-Not-F-294198.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Haywoode-Youd-Better-Not-F-294198.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Broken Social Scene

Jennica, I just reverted several anon vandalism edits at Broken Social Scene to the last edit you did there. If you're familiar with the article and band, please review to make sure the article looks ok now. Thanks, AUTiger ʃ ^talk/_work 01:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:House dvd33 png.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:House dvd33 png.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Sides in album track listings

Hey there. Regarding this change, please note that WP:ALBUM#Track listings recommends such subheadings in cases like this. I've reverted the change. Have a nice day. --PEJL 17:00, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

You mean like ? We'd have to have such comments all over every article, to stop all potential errors people make. And even then people would likely ignore them. So I don't think that is a solution to this problem. --PEJL 18:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Sure. We do have one comment at the top of the infobox on most album articles, to WP:ALBUM. Hopefully people will read that. Have a nice day. --PEJL 21:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Professional album review ratings

Hi again. Regarding this change, please note that WP:ALBUM#Professional reviews says not to use star ratings for reviews that don't use stars. I've reverted this change. --PEJL 17:31, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

I saw you just made this change. I've reverted this change because of this guideline. Have a nice day. --PEJL 15:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

I just happen to be watching the pages you edit. I have a lot of pages on my watchlist. Cya. --PEJL 21:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and also note that I reverted this change of yours from yesterday, since dates are preferred over the text "link", also per WP:ALBUM#Professional reviews. I'll stop bothering you now. :-) --PEJL 17:36, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:FU

Your violation of WP:FU on Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen has been reverted. --Yamla 23:07, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:House dvd33 png.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:House dvd33 png.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)