Talk:Jenny Macklin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This page is about an active politician who is running for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

Portal	Jenny Macklin is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

this will need editing when we find out who takes over from latham. The bellman 12:29, 2005 Jan 19 (UTC)

Ambi, first off, I was making a point with the last edit. I still fail to see how Macklin can be described as a 'solid parliamentary performer' without sources but cant be described as a failure as Deputy Leader without sources. Most people with a decent knowledge of politics would agree both are true. --RaiderAspect 01:01, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

I think this could all be solved by getting a cite for both. I'd be very surprised if we couldn't find quite a few commentators to quote who've said exactly both those things. Ambi 02:23, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

You'd think so, but I cant seem to find anything from google. I'll have a more indepth look tomorrow. --RaiderAspect 08:36, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Try Factiva if you have access to it. Ambi 09:31, 14 November 2005 (UTC)