User talk:Jemather
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] NPOV tag on Bhopal Disaster
I reverted some vandalism and it looked to me like the vandal had added the template. Re-add it if you wish. I am curious about what you think is POV in this article. You seem to have removed a lot of text that was cited and referenced. Generally, if something is sourced, it's okay (except, obviously, in the case of racist and hate speech mediums and the like). TheQuandry 18:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- Most of the content I removed was plagiarized from its references that I would call questionable at best. Beyond that, I don't like the article's approach. I feel like it should be relatively simple and matter-of-fact, with criticisms put into the "Criticisms" section, instead of a having a running commentary throughout the whole article. It also extensively uses a "we-say, they-say" duality I don't think does an adequate job of framing the situation. Thoughts? Jemather 14:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- That seems to make sense. So it's not so much POV as it is just a poorly written article with some copyright infringing text? In any case, good luck with your rewrite! TheQuandry 15:01, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Most of the content I removed was plagiarized from its references that I would call questionable at best. Beyond that, I don't like the article's approach. I feel like it should be relatively simple and matter-of-fact, with criticisms put into the "Criticisms" section, instead of a having a running commentary throughout the whole article. It also extensively uses a "we-say, they-say" duality I don't think does an adequate job of framing the situation. Thoughts? Jemather 14:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
