Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses literature

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject on Jehovah's Witnesses This article is part of WikiProject Jehovah's Witnesses, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Jehovah's Witnesses. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

The purpose and structure of this article is awkward. The first part suggests that the article is specifically about literature published by the Witnesses, and then suddenly lists externally-produced literature about the Witnesses. Either the introduction of the article should be more specific about the purpose and scope of the article, or there should be a separate articles for publications about Jehovah's Witnesses, and publications of Jehovah's Witnesses.--Jeffro77 03:47, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Article introduction

Just how "well known" (outside of the Witnesses) are the Watchtower, Awake, Knowledge, and Require publications??--Jeffro77 09:29, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

  • And what about "Theocratic Warfare Doctrine"? - Lying in Court and Religion: An Analysis of the Theocratic Warfare Doctrine of the Jehovah's Witnesses: Jerry Bergman, Ph.D.-értekezése. 2002, Vol. 1, No. 2 Northwest State College Archbold, Ohio (http://www.freeminds.org/doctrine/lyingincourt.doc) ---- 80.98.211.165 09:56, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Grammar

What is actually most correct? "Jehovah's Witnesses literature" or "Jehovah's Witness literature"? Summer Song 05:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Shining as Illiminators in the World

I was once a Jehovah's Witness. I also was a pioneer and have the "Pioneer Book (Shining as Illiminators in the World)" I would like to contribute an article about that book. First I want to make sure that there is going to be an unbiased peer review of the article. I want to make sure this book is portrayed accurately. Please provide feedback. Thanks John196920022001 04:32, 14 March 2007 (UTC)