Talk:Jean Van Heijenoort
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Jean Van Heijenoort is within the scope of WikiProject France, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses. | |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Politics and government work group. | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||||||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale. | ||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
I, the Concerned Cynic, chanced upon this article in December 2005 and promptly revised it extensively. I am privileged to own a copy of Feferman's biography. VH's personal life was a stickier wicket than I let on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.36.179.65 (talk) 14:52, 8 December 2005
[edit] Van vs van
The body text of the article, as well as the Math Genealogogy page, capitalize the Van. I have thus, as was done for Townes Van Zandt, capitalized the V in the page title, and alphabetized the sort keys under Van Heijenoort. grendel|khan 13:22, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] jean van h
hey wasts up my name is jean van i was born yesterday in the hospital u was born and i luv u —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 170.235.222.10 (talk) 13:17, 3 May 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Book about JVH's work
reviewed here. Looks interesting. Maybe something from the review can be worked into the article. The book should also be referenced. Modern Logic 2/3 (1992) also has a lot of material. [1] Actually more stuff is easy to find, so the article can be expanded some. I don't know if I'll attempt this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.241.238.233 (talk) 03:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
