User talk:Jazza5
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] License tagging for Image:Histon Fc.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Histon Fc.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
[edit] James Milner Career section
Not really asking for full feedback on this article (although I wouldn’t mind it). I’d just like to know what you feel the best way the divide up the Career section is, by Club, by season, not at all or some other way. Please leave your reply under the section in my talk page named “Milner Career section”. Buc 16:46, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Histon F.C. vandalism
Seems OK now - did you get it sorted....? ChrisTheDude 06:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah cheers Chris, after a series of tries managed to restore the Histon article back to its former glory! ;) Cheers for the reply back anyway! Jazza5 (talk) 20:30, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Histon F.C.
Hi. I'm trying to get this article to conform to Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Clubs by adding a colours & badge section, but you've just undone this. To quote you from the Talk:Histon F.C. page:
The club crest and colours should be put in another section...
Can we agree that this should be the case? Dancarney (talk) 11:06, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- I agree, it should be put in another section if more information was found and I stand by what I said, the only reason I undid it was because there was insufficient information for the statement to fill another section and would make the article look messy. It does its job where the info is at the moment in the opening paragraph and if more information isn't recovered or found, then I don't see why it should be moved from there. Jazza5 (talk) 20:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, no I wasn't intending to do that when I removed the sourced info, sorry Number 57. Put it back in the article...Jazza5 (talk) 19:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
