Talk:Jazzmatazz, Vol. 1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
|
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:GuruJazzmatazz.jpg
Image:GuruJazzmatazz.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The first?
Honestly, the second sentence "The album revolutionized jazz rap, and is usually considered the first full-fledged fusion of jazz and hip hop." sounds like marketing copy written by Guru. I'm not sure what "Full-fledged" means in this case, but if it's talking about combining a live jazz band with hip hop production and rapping, then the first album to do that was Miles Davis's Doo-Bop. The second one was Greg Osby's 3-D Lifestyles. At best Jazzmatazz was the third. It's only notable first was that it was the first combination of a live jazz band with hip hop production and a rapper who was fairly talented.
I also question in what manner hip hop jazz was revolutionized. It's not clear that this album had any large effect on the combination of hip hop and jazz and was not that different stylistically from its predecessors. In light of all this, I'm going to remove the claim about revolutionizing hip hop jazz and rewrite the claim about it's being the original to be more accurate.KeithyIrwin 17:02, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:GuruJazzmatazz.jpg
Image:GuruJazzmatazz.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
