User:JayKeaton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a Wikipedia user page.

This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JayKeaton.

Warning to all editors: This user is armed with VandalProof

Note to readers. Please do not post/donate/give me ANY barnstars or such awards on my user page. Any posted awards to me will be considered vandalism and will be deleted by yours truly. You have been warned...

Achievments
Star Member This user has made over 320,000 edits, making him the coolest wikipedia member on Earth.
This member has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize 57 times. World Leader
Communist This user is a communist.

This member is a Vietnam veteran.

War History
Better than you

This user is currently working on the Bette Midler page, although he has been saying that for many months now...

I love wikipedia, really I do. I spend a lot of time here. But really, wikipedia is to the enyclopedic world, what Urban Dictionary is to the dictionary world. It's just a bit of fun, it wont last, it can't be counted on. Urbanpedia would have been a better name for it JayKeaton 12:42, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

I am a pro vandalism user. I do not vandal myself, nor do I condone it, but vandalism is something that attracts a lot of people to Wikipedia, it keeps people talking about it, it feeds the "controversy". Without this edgy side to wikipedia, a lot of people may have perhaps not been interested in working on it or using it, so perhaps wikipedia may not have taken off at all if it weren't for vandals. JayKeaton 20:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

What grinds my gears? Wikipedia users that use improper deletion tags on new articles that do not need to be deleted, and lazy admins who go ahead and delete the articles without even checking if the article even broke the rules of the tag cited. Or even lazy admins that would rather flat out delete a perfectly good stub without trying to improve on it themselves or even asking the article starter to improve it. Just because you do not like a page doesn't mean you should just slap any old tag on there and go ahead and delete it. If you do that, you are violating wikipedias own rules and you are simply damaging the further creation of useful articles. Plus it's simply a lazy thing to do. Any admins or users that break these rules, I will be book marking their page and recording that and any further incident of rule breaking and laziness. So when promotion or demotion time comes along for the, I will be able to inform and prove to the other voters just how lazy and destructive that wikipedian really is JayKeaton 13:38, 27 June 2007 (UTC)


Democracy does not guarantee equality of conditions - it only guarantees equality of opportunity - Irving Kristol

All Bibles are man-made - Thomas Edison

I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires - Susan B. Anthony

What religion a man shall have is a historical accident, quite as much as what language he shall speak - George Santayana

Without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion - Steven Weinberg