From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Pornography, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] |
| Mid |
This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
[edit] Catholic
I believe this is important enough to deserve the few words it gets, as his religion could be considered in noticeable conflict with his chosen profession. It is well cited, via the New York Times article. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 14:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- I disagree. Whose life does not conflict with the doctrine of the catholic church? Also from a moral viewpoint there are far worse violations than creating pr0n. Think of soldiers, police, mafia. Those people are willing to kill which is a *definitive* violation of the 10 commandments which are even shared between all Christians and Jews when most of these rules are derived from common sense and are respected by everyone. Pr0n is a rather fuzzy violation. Now while the Catholic church has (currently) very strict additional rules, everyone is a sinner in their eyes anyway even by birth. Their believe is that God forgives and Jesus died for everyone's sins (not just those in the past). So I really fail to see what's so special about this guy. --217.87.99.20 10:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Your commentary on the Catholic Church is utter dross, and completely uncalled-for on this page. Discussions of morality and such do not have a place in a discussion of what content to place in a Wikipedia article. AnonEMouse has made a proposal for content and is apparently willing to back it up with a reference. Your diatribe has no such support and is patently offensive to a devout Catholic. --TheTriumvir 02:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- S/he's right though. 82.45.100.187 (talk) 20:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
