Talk:Jason Calacanis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

An individual covered by or significantly related to this article, Jason Calacanis, has edited Wikipedia as Jasoncalacanis (talk · contribs)

Somebody added that Engadget was the first Weblogs blog. According to other Wikipedia articles, the company started in September 2003, and Engadget launched in March 2004, so that doesn't appear to be correct. --Michael Snow 16:45, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Nice to see that Wikipedians are working on a bio project. There was much talk about bio pages at Wikimania '06. --User:Jasoncalacanis

Contents 1 Mahalo 2 Criticisms of Him and The SEO World? 3 Protected 3.1 Conflict with the SEO Community

[edit] Mahalo

Information about the Mahalo startup should be added to this article, along with citations to reliable sources. If or when that startup gains enough news coverage to satisfy WP:CORP, that can be split into a separate article. Any editors who work for Mahalo or Calacanis should refrain from editing these articles directly. Please use the talk page and let a neutral editor decide how to incorporate the material. Jehochman ^Talk 09:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Criticisms of Him and The SEO World?

There was a lot of drama between him and the SEO world, which resulted in him getting shown up pretty bad by Neil Patel. Is there any reason this stuff is not included? Or is there some order saying this information should not be placed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.11.165.17 (talk) 03:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Protected

The page is now protected for 7 days. During this time, please try and find common ground and arrive to a version that all can live with. If you cannot, this is a good time to pursue dispute resolution such as third opinions or requests for comments. If you are ready to resume editing or to contest the protection, place a request at WP:RFPP. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 02:31, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Conflict with the SEO Community

I don't have a problem with a section about this being included, as long as it isn't given undue weight. I think the section should be reinserted, but the comment about an outcry from the respectable SEO community should be removed unless there are better sources. I would normally think that the link to Patel's blog should be removed as well, but since it's also linked to directly from the second Calacanis link, it's probably ok.
After having taken more time to look at this, my removal of the entire section did appear to be unnecessary. I saw some random removals, some false edit summaries, and that the section was being sourced only by 6 blog links. --Onorem♠Dil 14:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC)