User:Jaranda/Articles for deletion/Carthage

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Resistance is futile! - Mailer Diablo 07:15, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Carthage

This article is a threat to everything this wiki is! Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam Cato the elder 00:27, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Speedy Keep How amusing, an April Fool!  (aeropagitica)  00:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep We must know our enemy. --Allen3 talk 00:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Raze it to its foundations and salt its fields! Ashibaka tock 00:55, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Fake AfDs because of April Fool's Day. I never would've expected that... --Kinu t/c 01:01, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Fire and sword! Brian G. Crawford 01:58, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • SPQR Ita erat quando hic adveni. Kotepho 02:03, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Natural enemies of my Empire. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 02:06, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Support. I thought he already was one! — Phil Welch (t) (c) 02:06, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Support we need more Elephants Hannibal 02:13, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, can't think of anything clever or witty to say. --TBC??? ??? ??? 02:43, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge with Rome. Herostratus 04:59, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • haha! You can't see me! Bob Ice (time has no meaning)
  • Stealthykeep Celcius 02:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete! Let us start the 4th Punic War! EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 03:02, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Quo usque tandem abutere, Cato, patentia nostra? Fan1967 03:18, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Carthago delenda est! Is that the one you were looking for? Ande B 03:32, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep. Rome passed the three previous RfDs, but Carthage is scrappy and still fields in the minors. T K E 07:10, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.