User talk:Jankasphere
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] November 2007
Your recent edit to Marimar (Philippine TV series) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or YouTube/Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 06:46, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Marimar (Philippine TV series) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or YouTube/Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 08:04, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your blog...
...fails to qualify as a reliable source. Do not reinsert your so-called "criticism" since it will be invalid. --Howard the Duck 13:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Marimar (Philippine TV series), you will be blocked from editing. --Howard the Duck 16:18, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --AW (talk) 16:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
{{subst:uw-vandalism5|Marimar (Philippine TV series)}} --Howard the Duck 07:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] You have been blocked
Currently I've blocked your account from editing for 72 hours; if you read your talk page and convincingly respond, indicating a willingness to use talk pages to discuss such controversial edits in the future, I have no particular objection if a neutral admin releases the block early. I regret having to do this, but all other attempts to get your attention seem to have failed. Apologies for any inconvenience. – Luna Santin (talk) 07:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] December 2007
When adding links to material on an external site, as you did to Hairspray (2007 soundtrack), please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website has licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:
-
- If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
- If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;
If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. NrDg 05:58, 7 December 2007 (UTC)