User talk:Jangod

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Notability of Annette Insdorf

A tag has been placed on Annette Insdorf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Razorflame (talk) 20:29, 23 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Speedy deletion of The Prime Time

A tag has been placed on The Prime Time requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AWeenieMan (talk) 21:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] New articles created by you about films

Not every film listed in Leonard Maltin's Movie & Video Guide or in Videohound Golden Movie Retriever is notable enough to have its own article in Wikipedia. Please read our guidelines to notability and films for more details. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Notability is not inherited, as they say. A film can be important in the careers of a couple of people, without itself acquiring notability. To deserve its own article, a film must be worthy of note in and of itself. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC)