From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Name: Steve
- Home: Dallas, Texas, USA
- Age: 42
- Current profession: Network Operations Manager for a small software company
- Avocations: Wanna-be superhero, geek errant, sometime writer of SF/F
 |
According to the Political Compass this user is:
Economic Left (-2.13) and
Social Libertarian (-1.64) |
|
| Tip of the day...
Inserting a picture in an article
The syntax used for displaying an image is:
- [[Image:{name}|{type}|{location}|{size}|{caption}]]
Only [[Image:{name}]] is required. The other details are optional and can be placed in any order. They are:
- Type
- 'thumb' / 'thumbnail' or 'frame'. This causes image to be displayed with specific formatting. "thumb" is normally preferred.
- Location
- 'right', 'left', 'center' or 'none'. Determines placement of the image on the page. "Left" or "right" is the norm, but large panoramas or timelines can be displayed in the center.
- Size
- {width}px or {width}x{height}px (e.g. 50x40px, would limit width to 50 and height to 40). Normally only one variable is used. Use common sense when determining the sizes; you can use the "Show preview" button if you need to.
- Caption
- Any element which cannot be identified as one of the above is automatically treated as caption text. It is traditional to put this last. The caption should identify what the image is, and ideally be a complete sentence that adds to the article by pointing out something a casual reader wouldn't have noticed otherwise, or add information the pertains to the image.
If you have a picture that isn't already in Wikipedia's image collection that you want to include in an article, you will need to upload it first.
Prior tip - Next tip
To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}.
Become a Wikipedia tipster
|
[edit] Important Wikipedia Links
|
Getting Started
|
|
|
|
Getting Help
|
|
|
|
Policies and Guidelines
|
|
|
|
The Community
|
|
|
|
Things to do
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
|
[edit] Interests
[edit] Why I watch
There is a type of creature worse than the clown who blanks pages or replaces words with obscenities or cute comments about their school mates: I am talking about the villain who subtly tries to change entries, to change information hoping no one will notice. This is not silliness. This is not goofing off. This is destructive malice for its own sake. There is no payoff for the villain except knowledge that he has deliberately deceived people, that he has deliberately sown chaos into a system whose only purpose is to make information more accessible to everyone. Some people argue that Wikipedia is "unreliable" because it can be edited by anyone. But the villain who pretends to claim he is helping people by increasing Wikipedia's unreliability is a moral cesspool. Many people think the person who disagrees with them about some issue or another is a "bad guy." But the true bad guys are those who hurt people just for the sake of hurting them, and--in the case of Wikipedia--those who deceive people just for the sake of deceiving them. --Janus Shadowsong 16:13, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Respect Wikipedia
I wrote this to an editor who claimed to be trying to prove that Wikipedia is unreliable by adding false information:
I appreciate your desire to teach a lesson that information found on the Internet should be treated with caution. However, you are also teaching your class to treat Wikipedia with disrespect. Wikipedia is a collective effort by thousands of good people with the intent of making the vast store of human knowledge more easily acccessible to everyone, for the benefit of everyone. Please show it the kind of respect you would give to anything that makes better lives for you and the people you care about.
