Talk:Jan Willem Spruyt/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Assessment comments

Assessment comments for this article can be found on the peer review page at WikiProject Biography. Michel Doortmont (talk) 10:20, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GA-status assessment & 2nd opinion request

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


This article is a fairly short, but still comprehensive article on a interesting and noteworthy figure from South African and world history. There may be some assessment concerns, but these seem minor and not heavy enough to disallow GA-status. See the separate comments below.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Prose is clear, spelling and grammar seem correct; 2nd opinion useful?
    B. MoS compliance:
    Issues with regard to style guide were addressed in peer review
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    No images available; issue addressed in peer review (see comments and reply in that section)
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Although I am confident this article qualifies as GA, because of the points brought forward above, a second opinion would be useful.

Makeshift Thackery (talk) 10:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)