Talk:James and the Giant Peach (film)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] List of Animated Films link
Do we really need this link? Yeah, Peach is animated, but then we would have to put List of Films at the bottom of every live-action movie page. There has to be hundreds of thousands of animated films and including this link seems very vague.PowderedToastMan 05:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:James and the giant peach.jpg
Image:James and the giant peach.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:James and the giant peach.jpg
Image:James and the giant peach.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 18:09, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:James and the giant peach.jpg
Image:James and the giant peach.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Tags
This article has no references or citations of any kind. This is especially problematic in a section that compares book and film, as the lack of references would tend to imply it is original research, which isn't allowed on Wikipedia. Hopefully, someone will attend to this. Wildhartlivie (talk) 08:59, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- Never mind the lack of citations; I just don't think a simplistic list of changes from the novel to the film is all that productive in an encyclopedia article. I've removed it. Thegreatcurve (talk) 11:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)