From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal. |
|
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. (Add assessment comments) |
Low |
This article has been rated as low-importance within the BBC WikiProject. |
Tasks for WikiProject BBC:
|
This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard. |
|
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
- If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
- If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
|
[edit] Controversy
I wonder whether this needs re-writing. While the Youtube contributor has clearly unearthed coverage from a Chinese media source which did cover the disruption to the flame through London, we need to be very careful to establish the date when it was broadcast against the date of Reynold's BBC report. Also, is the CCTV which is shown outside China, the same CCTV which is shown to those inside the country? Reynold's theme was that China was misleading its own people, not those outside it. Furthermore, Reynolds is a reporter. Ultimate responsibility for any bias rests with the editorial team. I am not saying that this is not an important story. On the face of it, Reynold's report was one sided and misleading. But I wonder whether the entry is entirely encyclopaedic. Informed Owl (talk) 11:47, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Informed Owl