Talk:James Munro (British author)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

DAAPG 15:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)== NPOV ==

Quote="...were tough-minded, well-written, and well-plotted. They had a genuinely heroic (and intelligent) protagonist, an eccentric M-type boss, and menacing villains."

It sounds to me as if this is a little biased. Well-written? Well-plotted? Sounds more like a critics review, which this is not the place for. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mooseberry (talk • contribs) 04:59, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Having just re-read all four Munro thrillers, I agree with the article's anonymous author that they are "well-written" and "well-plotted". My only disagreement is with the description of Loomis, Department K's boss, as resembling M. M is a cold fish of course. What spy chief isn't? But Loomis is downright nasty.