Talk:James Gillogly

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.

[edit] Best cryptanalyst

We say:

"On the PBS website, they report that he has been called "arguably the best non-government cryptanalyst in the U.S."

However, on the PBS website the quote is not attributed. Moreover -- and with all respect to Gillogly -- the assertion is almost certainly false, given all the very smart folk involved in academic crypto research in the US. It's a little like comparing apples to oranges, too, as (AFAIK) Gillogly does work on solving classical/machine crypto, as opposed to modern cryptography. — Matt Crypto 14:42, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Good point. I do think it's appropriate though that a mention be made of just how well-known he is. How about the wording, "He is currently considered to be one of the best non-government cryptanalysts in the United States"? That way we have "one of the" instead of "the", and we can still link to the PBS site as reference. Elonka 15:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

The PBS Nova article is more specific than this: '..."arguably the best non-government cryptanalyst in the U.S." in the field of classical (historical) cryptosystems.' This may well still be false, but it addresses and doesn't conflict with your point. User:Scryer 11 Sep 2006