James Keegstra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Antisemitism
Judenstern

History · Timeline · Resources

Forms
Anti-globalizational · Arab
Christian · Islamic · Nation of Islam
New · Racial · Religious
Secondary · Academic · Worldwide

Allegations
Deicide · Blood libel · Ritual murder
Well poisoning · Host desecration
Jewish lobby · Jewish Bolshevism
Usury · Dreyfus affair
Zionist Occupation Government
Holocaust denial

Antisemitic publications
On the Jews and Their Lies Protocols of the Elders of Zion
The International Jew
Mein Kampf
The Culture of Critique series

Persecutions
Expulsions · Ghettos · Pogroms
Jewish hat · Judensau
Yellow badge · Spanish Inquisition
Segregation · The Holocaust
Nazism · Neo-Nazism

Opposition
Anti-Defamation League
Community Security Trust
EUMC · Stephen Roth Institute
Wiener Library · SPLC · SWC
UCSJ · SCAA · Yad Vashem

Categories
Antisemitism · Jewish history

v  d  e

James "Jim" Keegstra is a far-right Canadian political figure, and former public school teacher. Keegstra was convicted of hate speech. He appealed his conviction to the Supreme Court where he was unsuccessful; it received substantial notoriety internationally, and became a landmark Canadian legal case.

Contents

[edit] Background

Keegstra was an auto mechanic, a former mayor, and a high school teacher in the town of Eckville, Alberta [1]. In 1984, Keegstra was stripped of his teaching certificate and charged under the Criminal Code of Canada with "wilfully promoting hatred against an identifiable group" by teaching his social studies students that the Holocaust was a fraud and attributing various evil qualities to Jews. He thus described Jews to his pupils as "treacherous", "subversive", "sadistic", "money-loving", "power hungry" and "child killers". He taught his classes that Jewish people seek to destroy Christianity and are responsible for depressions, anarchy, chaos, wars and revolution. According to Keegstra, Jews "created the Holocaust to gain sympathy" and, in contrast to the open and honest Christians, were said to be deceptive, secretive and inherently evil. Keegstra expected his students to reproduce his teachings in class and on exams. If they failed to do so, their marks suffered. [2]

Keegstra attempted to have this charge quashed as a violation of his freedom of expression; this motion was denied, and he was convicted at trial. Many of his former students testified against him. Publicly stating that Keegstra had brought their town into disrepute, locals were unable to impeach Keegstra as mayor and instead overwhelmingly voted him out of office at the next election.

[edit] Supreme Court Appeal

Keegstra appealed this conviction, claiming that it was in violation of Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This section guarantees "freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication." Keegstra also challenged his conviction on the grounds that Section 319(3)(a) of the Criminal Code of Canada, which states that a person cannot be convicted of promoting hatred if she or he establishes that the statement is true, but only where the accused proves the truth of the communicated statements on a balance of probabilities, was a violation of Section 11(d) of the Charter. That section guarantees "the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal." Keegstra was not able to demonstrate the truth of the many anti-Semitic statements he made to his students, on a balance of probabilities. In the CBC News presentation Canada's Hate Law: The Keegstra Case (1991), Keegstra himself displayed the hate material where his views were obtained, admitting that none of it came from mainstream historical sources.

Keegstra's appeal ultimately reached the Supreme Court of Canada, in the case of R. v. Keegstra. In December of 1990, the Court upheld Keegstra's conviction, ruling that the law's prohibition of hate propaganda and suppression of Keegstra's freedom of expression was constitutional. The majority of Justices looked at hate speech as not being a victimless crime, but instead having the potential for psychological harm, degradation, humiliation, and a risk of violence. [3]

[edit] Sentencing

At his original trial, Keegstra was given a fine of $5000. A subsequent decision by the Alberta Court of Appeal reduced that to a one-year suspended sentence, one year of probation, and 200 hours of community service work. [4]. While the Supreme Court upheld the original conviction and the constitutionality of the law, they did not restore the original sentence.

[edit] Social Credit

Keegstra was also active in the Social Credit Party of Canada. In 1986, he ran unsuccessfully for the party's leadership. He lost 67 votes to 38 to Harvey Lainson, an evangelical minister from Ontario. Keegstra served as the party's acting leader in July 1987, after the party's national executive ousted Lainson over his call to rename the party Christian Freedom. Lainson refused to relinquish the leadership and Keegstra was expelled from the Social Credit Party and its successor the Christian Freedom Social Credit Party in September.[1][2][3]

[edit] See also

Preceded by
Harvey Lainson
National Leaders of Social Credit (acting)
1987
Succeeded by
Harvey Lainson

[edit] References

  • Lee, Robert Mason. "Keegstra's Children." Saturday Night 100 (May 1985): 38-46.
  1. ^ "Socreds pick Keegstra as interim party leader", Globe and Mail, July 28, 1987. 
  2. ^ "FOR THE RECORD Keegstra out of Socreds, leader says", Globe and Mail, September 12, 1987. 
  3. ^ PARLINFO - Party files - Leadership - Social Credit Party of Canada. Parliament of Canada. Retrieved on 2007-09-18.