From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Constructive communications will be allowed on my user talk page per WP:CIV. Non-constructive personal attacks, non-supported opinions of sockpupptry, as well as snide and harassing comments will be removes, per WP:NPA and WP:AGF
In regards to this user User:Propol, his editing history speaks volumes of his delusional obsession and single minded purpose. see a SPA success story, well protected and all ways drawing first blood.
And finely, the sock puppet tag which Propol is unqualified to place, I will continue to remove that personal attack, because it's not true.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I was block due to unfounded accusations of being a sock puppet by User:Propol who’s trying to protect his pov agenda on the Peter Roskam biography. I don't know what legitimate proof, you have, other then "it just feel that way". Your blocking is a a form of harassment, slander and this editors personal attack are ignored. IF you have proof, pray tell what it is, or is this just how kangaroos hop in the court of wiki? This is blatant and bold face hypocrisy and it does not go unnoticed how you treat editors on political biographies."
Decline reason: "You're either a sock or so close in behavior to be indistinguishable. Regardless, your behavior has been entirely unacceptable. — Seraphimblade Talk to me 18:46, 10 June 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
