User talk:Jagvar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Lst27 (talk) 21:37, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Car images

Hello. Thanks for uploading so many public domain images of cars, some of them pretty professional looking. Finding 'free' images that can be used on Wikipedia is sometimes quite difficult, so it's great when a user such as yourself comes along. Given that you have marked them public domain, I presume that you took those photos yourself. If so, you might want to put something like "Photograph taken by User:Jagvar" on the image description pages. This is so we can be sure that they are in the public domain.

You might also consider uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons, a repository of multimedia that can be used by all of the Wiki projects. It's slightly more convoluted to upload images that way (you have to create another user account at Commons), but it means that if, say, a user on the German Wikipedia wants a photo of a particular car, he can get it without having to upload it again. SamH|Talk 12:15, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

No prob on the error - I make a ton of mistakes in identifying cars! A Virage shot would be awesome - I need to expand that article! I second the nod for uploading to the Commons instead of en.wikipedia - it takes no extra time or effort and is a much better place for images. --SFoskett July 6, 2005 19:51 (UTC)

[edit] Edits

Hello Jagvar!

Good work on all the recent edits on the car pages. It's good to see someone new making serious contributions to the automobile pages.

I did notice that very few of your edits have a summary. Can you start adding a quick summary when you modify a page? Without these, it can become a nightmare figuring out who made what changes, and it's sometimes necessary when trying to pin down facts or trace contributions.

Thanks! --Milkmandan 05:21, 2005 Feb 10 (UTC)

Good to hear back from you. I realize it can be pretty confusing around here—there are a lot of unwritten trends. I had a pretty hard time when I first started.
I'm sure you realize that we're all here at your disposal if you have any questions. Happy editing and good luck—if your previous edits are any indicator, then I'm certain you'll quickly become a very important member of the community. --Milkmandan 05:42, 2005 Feb 10 (UTC)


Thank you for the kind words about the SS Morro Castle page. You did a similarly outstanding job on the SS Noronic page. Congrats on that! I had not heard about the Noronic disaster before now. It's surprising (and sad) how many similarities there were with the SS Morro Castle disaster. Both disasters were caused by a combination of design problems and crew shortcomings. I guess there weren't as many lessons learned by the Morro Castle as there should have been. Thanks again, and best of luck with your next Wikipedia contributions. BartBenjamin Apr 8, 2005


[edit] Image:300C.JPG

Can you confirm that you took this image? Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 14:00, May 27, 2005 (UTC)

  • Thanks for the prompt response on this. If you want to, you can now upload the image to the commons, where all wikimedia projects can benefit. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 02:31, May 28, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] BMW 850CSi

Jagvar,

Hello! I saw your photo of one of my favorite cars, nice shot, don't think I've seen a yellow CSi before. But, the color balance was really wonky, so I tried to bring it back in line. Unfortunately, I uploaded a "new" version of the file as xxxxx.jpg instead of xxxxx.JPG, so now there are two versions out there. I re-linked the E31 CSi to the new image, but now it seems to appear as an image created by me, which was not my intention. If this is an issue, let me know and we can sort it out. Check out the new pic, though, it's a bit easier on the eyes.

Sirimiri 02:01, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Some Article Ideas

Hey Patrick- I've been looking for article ideas, and I thought a few of them that I ran in to we might both be interested in. First, the Lehigh University page isn't as good as it could be (I took some pictures today that I'll be putting on there soon). The page on the Packard automobile company is a bit wacky... there's way too much text before the TOC and the history can be improved. Also, there should be a separate entry for James Ward Packard. I know these aren't your kind of cars, but it's Lehigh-related. There some information about early Packard cars in the lobby of Packard Lab. The Packard entry should really be a disambiguation between the company and the man, come to think of it. -Matt Casey 19:35, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Phat Caddy XLR

Hello again, Jagvar....well, I decided to upload a newer photograph of the XLR, and lo and behold, the one I'm replacing is yet another of your photos...you probably think I'm stalking you or doing it on purpose, but I suspect it's because we both like some of the same cars :-) Anyway, have a gander at the new photo, tell me what you think.... --Sirimiri 05:04, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] your Mitshubishi Galant ES

Hi Jagvar,

You say you like supercars but can't afford one. I drive a Toyota MR2, mark II, revision 2. It is as close as I can get to a Lotus Elise at the moment. The MR2 is slower with a more regular design. It is not a supercar. But they are really affordable and the t-bar roof is winterproof. It is a bloody lot faster than most cars around. Fun to drive. Stable, breaks with 0.9G. Luggage space is just enough for a two seater. One drawback. No dating the Olson twins simultanious. Does anyone out there knows a better affordable t-bar sportscar?

Regards,

    Gert

[edit] Image source

Hi, where did you get Image:Nakhimov.JPG? These days we can't keep images around without source and copyright info. Stan 15:00, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] SS Morro Castle

Jagvar,

Please note that I have submitted the article SS Morro Castle for Peer Review. The review page can be found here. It still requires quite a bit of work until it might qualify for Featured Article status, but this is the first step toward that goal. When time permits, I'd like to add more information about the ship itself, not just the disaster. I'd also like to find another source on the disaster, as the current article relies far too heavily on one source. Please feel free to add your own improvements to the article. It will only make it better. Thank you.
Bart 21:42, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:SC400.JPG

Hi, when you uploaded this image you did not specify the source. Considering your interest in cars, I took the liberty of changing the copyright tag to {{PD-self}}. Thuresson 23:24, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Xtype_Estate.JPG

Hello Jagvar! I am new to wikipedia and I currently try to enhance the german wikipedia with an article concerning Jaguar X-Type. I would like to use your photograph in this article, but it seems that I can only link to photographs on Commons.wikipedia.org or on de.wikipedia.org. So my question: Would you mind moving your photograph to Commons? Thank you, --De Nucleolus 13:00, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi Jagvar! thank you very much! I already linked your photo to my article. Tomorrow I will add a referral link to your photos commons article! Best wishes, --De Nucleolus 21:41, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Important WikiProject Automobiles Discussion

Hello! As a Wikipedia:WikiProject Automobiles member, I just thought you might want to input your opinions on an important discussion we're currently having about whether articles regarding similar vehicles should be merged into one or split by brand. If you would like to comment or read further, please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles#Articles of Similar Vehicles. Thank you in advance for your thoughts and feedback. Airline 23:43, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Question

Jagvar why did you remove those gorgeous pictures of the New S8 and W12 A8 ???

[edit] Re: Image:TeenPeopleSept2003.jpg

I guess you are correct because the article does reference the magazine, although I feel that using the image under a fair use rationale is weak claim. However, I won't remove it again. It is just that the fair use claim for magazine issues are so often abused. Take this hypothetical situation, if there was a magazine with Natalie Portman on the cover and that image was used on the Natalie Portman article, but the article made absolutely no reference to the magazine, it would not be a valid fair use claim. Happy editing! --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 00:44, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:99 S600.jpg

Hello Jagvar, Some time ago, I transferred your image of a Mercedes S600 to the commons. You had marked it as PD-US so I did also choose this license. But this early morning, I read the complete license text and saw the public domain status is valid only in the US. Would you please agree to license which applies worldwide.

Thank you --MB-one 08:10, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] About Demographics

Hi Jagvar, Thank you for your note. I'm very interested in the placement of Demographics. Could you tell me where I could find out more about Wiki traditions/standards/rules/whatever on placement of that section, or for that matter, anything else specifically style-related to the design of pages for localities? Thanks!Noroton 01:55, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More about Demographics

Hi again, I asked RamMan, the creator of the rambot that originates the "geography" and "demographics" sections for each town and city, and his response didn't indicate that it matters to him where they go. I can't find anything else in Wikipedia that suggests keeping them up top, so at this point, I think those sections (at least demographics) should remain lower down on most pages.Noroton 00:18, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Here's a copy of my question and his response on RamMan's discussion page:

[edit] Does it matter where in an article the "Demographics" and "Geography" sections go?

Does it matter to the bot (that is, does it affect how well it works)? Does it matter to you -- that is, do you care, personally? Should there be a Wikipedia style rule or recommendation to keep them in a certain spot in each article that rambot creates? I ask all this because I've been moving these sections lower down on the page in the articles for several towns and cities in Fairfield County, Connecticut (see Darien, Connecticut for example). But now I'm being told that it's "Wikipedia style" to keep them up top. There's no such official style that I can find, and if there is going to be a universal "style" or even tradition, it seems to me that those sections should appear low in the article because other, less dry and more interesting sections are better left up top. If you agree with that, or even if you don't care, that helps my position. If you disagree, well, I'd still like to know. So ... whaddaya think? And thanks for creating rambot.Noroton 01:42, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Can't speak for the Ram-Man or Rambot, but personally I find those sections rather dry and think they ought to be at the bottom, just ahead of Refs, Exts, etc. If the article gets long, they're in the TOC for those who need to look up a fact. Now if there is some compelling or unique item in the demographics, or geography, then I'd have no problem with it earlier. But in that case it might be better to have that fact in its own section. Just my USD0.02.--J Clear 20:22, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

I won't be moving them, so if someone else reformats, I will leave the current ordering. The bot isn't intended to make those kinds of decisions, but to leave as much of the status quo in place. Ram-Man 11:50, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You're invited :)

WikiProject on Bodybuilding Please accept this invite to join the new WikiProject Bodybuilding, a WikiProject dedicated to improving bodybuilding related articles. Simply click here to accept! ~~~~

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Burning2.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Burning2.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Burning3.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Burning3.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Burning4.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Burning4.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:12, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pink Gallardo

Jagvar, the article on the Lamborghini Gallardo features a picture I presume you took - it's quite good, but apart from that do you know what colour it is? - it's not an official Lamborghini colour as far as I can see, so....?

Don't get me wrong, it's a welcome addition to the article, just seems a bit odd to have a non-original colour being displayed in an encyclopedia article.

Regards, Abarthaddict 14:02, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

The shade in question is pearl orange, a factory color. Jagvar 18:47, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Soz about that then- on second thoughts it does look a little pinky, but then like you say it's probably the light. Can you tell I'm not used to that much sun? Abarthaddict 08:33, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Bahamastar.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bahamastar.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:35, 22 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image:A8 Coupe.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:A8 Coupe.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 16:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

P.S. Also Image:Courthouse and Jail.jpg

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Zegna.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Zegna.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikiproject Automobiles Notification

Hi Jagvar, you were on the list of members at WikiProject Automobiles and we are introducing a new way of listing members, as the old list was becoming too long. Our new method involves having all of our members in a category.

To add yourself to the category just add the userbox to your user page by putting {{Wiki Auto Project}} where you want the userbox. Alternatively if you don't like the userbox you can add [[Category:WikiProject Automobiles members|Jagvar]] to your userpage.

If you no longer wish to be a member of the project, simply don't add the userbox or category, there's no pressure. Thanks for your time, James086Talk | Contribs 04:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:550Mar.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:550Mar.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User: Joepane

Hi jagvar, I noticed in December you issued a warning to User:Joepane on his discussion page for falsely claiming authorship of photos. I recently noticed an image he submitted Image:VWGolfPlus.jpg which is obviously not of his creation, and looking at his other images they mostly appear to be suspect.

I would like to report this problem to Wikipedia, but don't know how to do it. I wonder if you could help. Thanks. Memphisto 12:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] hey guy

hey man, your car is looking sweet...but I like american ones better usually. Anyways I was looking at conversations on the wiki auto project page and someone brought up that the Infiniti G20 article had useful though superflous information on it. Like the paint codes. I could see why this would be in a owners manual perhaps, but not here. I saw that you tried to remove the paint codes only to have them resotred, so I removed the paint codes, only to have them restored. I was wondering if you could help me convince Zoli Elo of this.

[edit] Limiting Information

I was wondering why you find it necessary to remove useful information from a particular article, such as the paint codes for the Infiniti G20. Last time I checked, this is a "free encyclopedia", and as long as information is relevant to a particular car (or any other subject) I'm not sure why it should be eliminated so it matches other similar articles. That doesn't make any sense to me.

Don't get me wrong, I understand that biased or non-cited information needs to be kept in check - but if one car's page has paint codes, and another's doesn't, does that mean that information suddenly becomes "superfluous"? When I was shopping for a G20, I happened to find those paint codes very helpful, as it was information that I couldn't find anywhere else. And your assumption that such information is the stuff of "owner's manuals" is incorrect. My car's owner's manual says nothing about the other colors available. Was it hurting Wikipedia or the G20 article itself to have said information included? Of course not. Unfortunately, even the most ideal, user-created Encyclopedia has to suffer from those who think that they rule the place or should go around regulating the information provided - even if it is useful to only a handful of folks out there...give me a break.

Last time I checked, a "real" encyclopedia, such as Britannica, doesn't even have individual car entries, much less entries for each manufacturer. In contrast, a "car encyclopedia", such as those books that focus on a particular era or manufacturer's history, tend to include the information that you would deem "superfluous" - because that info is important to car-nuts.--MackOSU 06:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Do whatever you want. There are two or three people who get all up-in-arms about the G20 article. I really don't care at this point. Jagvar 16:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Lakonia_Lifemag.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lakonia_Lifemag.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 13:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Bufori.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bufori.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Brioni.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Brioni.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Breitling logo.GIF

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Breitling logo.GIF. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:49, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Breitling logo.GIF

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Breitling logo.GIF. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Isdera.JPG

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Isdera.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Kiton.JPG

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kiton.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Schuppanlogo.JPG

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Schuppanlogo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Quattroporte I.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Quattroporte I.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 00:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] More replaceable fair-use images

—Chowbok ☠ 00:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] A8_Coupe.JPG

I have tagged Image:A8_Coupe.JPG as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rettetast 22:28, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Trivia on Quattroporte

Could I ask why you removed the Trivia on the Maserati Quattroporte article? Could you show me the link? If it is because the trivia is also on the Maserati page, I believe that all the trivia should be removed from the Maserati page and put onto the Quattroporte page because most of it is about the QP!!! mattytay 18:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

I get the fact that you've taken it off of the page, but your link re-directed me to Here and you haven't bothered to remove the trivia from the Maserati page at all! mattytay 05:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for bringing those bits of information to my attention. They have been promptly corrected. Jagvar 05:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:57_Fireflite.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:57_Fireflite.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 10:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:58Firedome.JPG

I have tagged Image:58Firedome.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 10:11, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:58Firesweep.JPG

I have tagged Image:58Firesweep.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 10:12, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:A8_Coupe.JPG

I have tagged Image:A8_Coupe.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 12:27, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Skoda2.jpg

I need more than a statement that this and other images are copyvios. Do you have links to the images on another website? If not, you can list them at WP:PUI for further review. Thanks for helping clean up around here! -- But|seriously|folks  03:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Ring Lady.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Ring Lady.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:41, 25 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 15:41, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ring Lady.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ring Lady.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 15:41, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:GulperEel.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:GulperEel.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:56, 4 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 91.65.124.74 14:56, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] E_Everhard.JPG

I have tagged Image:E_Everhard.JPG as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Garion96 (talk) 19:57, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:58Firesweep.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:58Firesweep.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:59, 19 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. |EPO| da: 09:59, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Killer_rabbit.JPG

I have tagged Image:Killer_rabbit.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Alpta 17:21, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Killer rabbit.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Killer rabbit.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Breitling logo.GIF)

Thanks for uploading Image:Breitling logo.GIF. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:35, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:RainbowLogo.JPG

I have tagged Image:RainbowLogo.JPG as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Coredesat 07:23, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reply

I'm not sure what to make of it. I haven't seen much of Bull-Doser lately. Honestly, most of his edits have usually been questionable at best. All I can find on Google is that Toyota has invested in a company called Lattice.

I suppose the redirect will get deleted and that should be the end of it. That IP hasn't been active for a month. If Bull-Doser recreates the article he will need a very good explanation. --Sable232 01:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Nakhimov.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nakhimov.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 13:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:A8 Coupe.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:A8 Coupe.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shell babelfish 06:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Noronic.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Noronic.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:07, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:07, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Noronicescape.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Noronicescape.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:07, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:07, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Noronicsmoke.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Noronicsmoke.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:08, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:08, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Noronicfire.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Noronicfire.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:08, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:08, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Noronicafter.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Noronicafter.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:08, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:08, 23 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jankel Group.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Jankel Group.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Qporte_iii.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Qporte_iii.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:48, 4 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:48, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:SuperV8.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:SuperV8.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree (talk) 00:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:XJ8 and XJ6.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:XJ8 and XJ6.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Schuppanlogo.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Schuppanlogo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, Jagvar! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 12:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Yarmouth afire.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Yarmouth afire.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jankel Group.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Jankel Group.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Quattroporte II.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Quattroporte II.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I added a detailed fair use rationale using {{Non-free use rationale}} so no one should bother about it again. However, there is still one thing missing: where exactly did the image come from? Do you happen to know? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Schuppanlogo.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Schuppanlogo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:20, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:User oceanliners

A tag has been placed on Template:User oceanliners requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Invite

 Please accept this invite to join the Celtics WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with the Boston Celtics. Simply click here to accept!

- Milk's favorite Cookie 01:35, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Schuppanlogo.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Schuppanlogo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 12:36, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:88th Street.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:88th Street.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:A8 Coupe.JPG}

Thank you for uploading Image:A8 Coupe.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:31, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Berlin_iii.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Berlin_iii.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:35, 23 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 03:35, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Andain.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Andain.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:15, 21 May 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ayresbridge.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ayresbridge.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:54, 21 May 2008 (UTC)