User talk:Jag123

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my talk page. To add something, please click here.

Archive 1

Contents

[edit] Enzymes etc

Hi Jag123, I like all your enzyme work. I've been doing a lot of enzymes lately, which is much outside my own field but a lot of fun. Wikipedia has quite good molecular biology, but there is still a lot of work to be done. I like the fact that we can easily link molecular biology with relevant diseases, making it a very powerful system. JFW | T@lk 15:28, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I am not at all opposed to an enzyme box that contains all relevant info. It would go a long way in collating useful information, although we have to be careful not to try too much at the same time. JFW | T@lk 00:29, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I'd be a bit careful with what "all relevant info" means. You don't want to get into the position of replicating a Swissprot record in the box, I wouldn't think. (example publically available Swissprot record) Courtland 00:48, 2005 Feb 14 (UTC)

[edit] Nuclear fusion

Hi, just to let you know I just undid your revert on the nuclear fusion article. I almost reverted it myself when I saw the change - anon edit to a number like that does set the alarm bells ringing! But in fact the edit looks to be accurate - certainly the numbers didn't add up before, and either 75,000 needed to be changed to 7,500, or 0.1MeV would have to be 1MeV. I don't know for certain but I am pretty sure 0.1MeV is right, and so 7,500 was also correct. Worldtraveller 17:19, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Deletion of useless stub templates and stub categories

Could you explain to me what you meant by the 10 day thing? Did you mean the tally on the TFD and CFD? -- AllyUnion (talk) 23:05, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Er... oops... wrong user in that respect. I changed the requirements with respect to notification. Please see the page, and let me know if you think I can make any further improvements. -- AllyUnion (talk) 23:14, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
If that is the case, we have to decide a guideline. Not to interrupt stub sorting in any manner, but I believe that the guidelines need to be set down before we continue. Let us face it, the English Wikipedia is nearly at 500k articles. Without clear guidelines for our sorting project, we will have far more problems when the English Wikipedia goes beyond that 500k level. -- AllyUnion (talk) 23:06, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Geo-stubs

Hi Jag123, No offense intended, but it's going to slow down the stub sorting if I have to go and correct a lot of the stubs you do! Please remember that geo-stubs are now largely divided by country. I'm not expecting anyone to learn all the new templates, but a few of the common ones, like UK-geo-stub, might be useful :) Grutness|hello? 00:51, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

...I just went through a long list of stubs and anything that was a geographical location (amongst many other things) was moved to their general category. If you're familiar with all of the geographical stubs, you don't have to go through the google search, I've just given you a bunch that you can properly sort once and for all. Having every one going through the generic stubs list and/or the google search and just picking articles that suit them isn't any faster for the project... Having that said, since you've seemed to have worked with a lot of geo stubs, tell me what templates I'm most likely to encounter and I'll be sure to specify it.

True, and sorry if I sounded annoyed. You are doing good work with the stub sorting. Having said that, there are people going through the list looking for geography stubs, which is why there are very few of them in certain parts of the alphabet in the big stub list. The ones you'd be most likely to find are probably UK-geo-stub, US-geo-stub, and Canada-geo-stub. A lot of larger countries, like Canada, use "countryname-geo-stub", so that is worth trying with a preview. But any help is appreciated (even though I can seem grumpy at times!) Grutness|hello? 01:25, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Just found your note about the Falkland stubs (putting them in UK-geo-stub) - problem with getting two new messages, you only notice the last one! As you probably know, I've added a britOT-geo-stub since them, since the Faalklands and similar places were just about all that was left uncategorised. Grutness|hello? 23:30, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stub sorting guidelines

I sincerely believe that we really need to lay down the law in stub sorting, and really provide a guideline. I believe that we should all attempt to reach a general consensus by April 2, 2005 in a set of rules that we can follow. Once we have built a set of guidelines, we can formally create a policy out of those guidelines. We need to define what a specialized topic stub is, how many articles it should cover, when is it appropriate to create it, what defines its need for its creation, what defines its need for deletion, what criteria it should follow, what are the general steps should one take when sorting a stub, whether or not to start using subst: for all templates, whether or not use subst: for all templates created by the meta-templates, and any other matters that may come up in consideration. I thank jag123 for initially creating the subpage for the project at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Stub sorting/Guidelines. Even though they have been discussed, I feel that we really need to confirm everything. For that, we should discuss each issue with its own sections, and raise a list of issues that we need to nail down before really continuing on. The English Wikipedia is nearly at 500k articles. Either the MediaWiki software needs to handle stubs such that they can be found with a simple union of categories, or the sorting is done manually by Wikipedians. Personally, I think the latter is less taxing on the server load, especially when we use subst:, which I think would help the Wikipedia out, performance wise. Please make your comments at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Stub sorting/Guidelines. I apologize for making this somewhat of a spam notice, but since the project has more members, the project can finally decide on these important issues at hand. -- AllyUnion (talk) 23:24, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] NP-easy

Hi Jag123,

yesterday I changed the article about NP-easy problems. In particular, I changed the example of an NP-easy problem from sorting to co-3-SAT. Sorting can be done in polynomial time, thus it is of course an example for an NP-easy problem, but it is in no sense a helpful example since the NP-oracle is not necessary for it. I think co-3-SAT is a better example since it shows that the class of NP-easy problems contains also all problems from co-NP. Is there a reason for changing the example back to sorting?

[edit] Taiwan and Republic of China

There is also Category:Republic of China, and that's where the Category:Taiwan-related stubs should be stick to. The current government in Taipei bears the official title of "Republic of China", but not the one in Beijing. — Instantnood 18:49, Feb 19 2005 (UTC)

[edit] China-geo-stubs

There are currently 201 articles in the category of China geography stubs.

Two involves both mainland China and the ROC

16 are related to the ROC only

and 183 are related to mainland China only. (No article is related to Hong Kong or Macao.)

I don't think readers would recognise Category:China geography stubs covers geostubs related to the ROC, until they read the notice on the of the category, or see category's link at an ROC-related article. — Instantnood 18:53, Feb 19 2005 (UTC)

The current settings make Template:China-geo-stub fails to fulfill its function to include ROC-related geostubs. Most ROC-related geostubs are inserted the tag {{Taiwan-stub}} instead of {{China-geo-stub}} (see Category:Taiwan-related stubs), an obvious evidence that editors do hestitate to put on such a template. — Instantnood 15:51 Feb 20 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Meta Templates harmful

Re: your various posts negative side effects of meta templates, I was wondering if converting the many stub templates to no longer use metastub or metapicstub templates, but have something <div class="boilerplate".... would help things. Will changing a stub template that is used by several hundred (or thousands) articles, cause a DoS-type attack, like you describe in Wikipedia:Meta-templates considered harmful? Is this something that's worth doing or not really? --jag123 20:51, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Converting this is probably a good idea, and has been discussed on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Stub sorting#Meta-templates?. I would think that as long as you make the subst: conversion at an off-peak time (say 00:00-06:00 UTC), the impact might be minimal. -- Netoholic @ 21:11, 2005 Feb 21 (UTC)

I think I made you misunderstand. I meant to use subst on the template. Edit "Template:Foo-stub" and replace {{MetaPicstub|...}} with {{subst:MetaPicstub|...}}. -- Netoholic @ 04:38, 2005 Feb 23 (UTC)

Thanks.:) Best time to do it is best found by looking at the squid graphs. Of course, that does need to be a time when you're actually available.:) The lower the traffic, the less disrupton there is because the database servers will have more unused disk seeks available to process the updates. I tend not to notice updates affecting a few hundred articles, so those you can probably do whenever is convenient for you at any rate which works for you (well, with a few seconds between them). Ideally not at the busiest 6 hours or so though. Once it gets to 1,000 or more it's good to wait a few minutes between each update to keep the potential frustration level for other people down. At 5,000 or more it's very useful to take care to leave gaps and do it off peak. Don't be unduly concerned about disruption - short term sacrifices for ongoing improvement are worth doing even if they do inconvenience people while they are happening. Jamesday 01:23, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] James Monroe University

Jag123, it concerns me that some individuals can post erroneous opinions using words like "some critics" etc. and get away with it. But when Alumni post information to rectify the statements then we get warnings and our amendments erased. Not exactly a fair go is it!

The fact is that this African University and other Liberian Universities are trying to rectify the misinformation being spread around. How can they do that if it keeps being erased on the Wikipedia and affiliated boards? There are some individuals with hidden agendas posting on these boards trying to deliberately derail these institutions.

As far as I see that should not be allowed in a fair forum.

Thanks for allowing me to post this in reponse.

[edit] OK

I changed the info and it was erased ...is that not vandalism? I point to factual info and it gets erased. I try to edit it and it gets erased ....


[edit] Yo

Can we add porn to wikipedia? --Pleaseoso der Tarafare 09:33, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Converting Template:LGBT-stub

Thanks for converting the new stub and giving me links to the information about why it should be converted. It was my first template (and darn was I proud of it), and I simply used another stub template as my startoff point. Well, now I know better and can make these stubs even better in the future. Best regards. Sfdan 08:37, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Canada stub Templates

See the talk page of your little controversial project. --Spinboy 19:44, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] One Life to Live

Hi, I realize that the policy regarding who should be listed under cast is still ongoing but Shanelle Workman has confirmed in numerous sources that she has started taping The Bold and the Beautiful so this isn't exactly a rumor.

User:Dowew

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/67.86.174.158

I've started an RFC about the anonymous user who has been adding anti-semitic remarks to Pontius Pilate. Since you attempted to resolve the dispute, I'd appreciate if you'd certify the RFC. It's available at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/67.86.174.158. Thanks. Rhobite 03:14, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Transwiki bot

Hey, somehow I missed your entry on my talk page from the 14th about you wanting me to transwiki the bits that were in a separate category like Category: Ready to Move to Wiktionary instead of the entries in Category:Copy to Wiktionary. If you would create a category like that and let me know where it is, and then change the template accordingly on the articles that you've formatted, I'd be happy to transwiki them once you've formatted them.

Also, were you asking me to not transwiki the articles from Category:Copy to Wiktionary? Personally, I think it's be more useful for you to format them over on Wiktionary after they've been transwikied rather than formatting them before they get moved - but whatever you want to do is fine with me. Kevin Rector 21:05, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Peer review

Hey, Jag123, at least from my horizon, we seem to have unconsciously been collaborating quite smoothly at creating a new Sesame Street peer review page and moving the listing to the right place! At least, for my part, I didn't even get an edit conflict, I hope you didn't either. It took me a little while to make the subpage, since there was an old request page in the way, so I suppose we were quite lucky it worked so well. 2 minutes apart in the history, congratulations to us both! :-) --Bischånen|Tåk 19:41, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Public domain image problems

Hi there! I noticed that you have placed some of your image contributions in the public domain. Unfortunately, it turns out that one can't place their work in the public domain, and so these image tags have been deprecated. I encourage you to replace the public domain tags on your images with free-use tags, which are similar in spirit, such as {{CopyrightedFreeUse-User}}. Please reply on my talk page or Wikipedia talk: You can't grant your work into the public domain if you have any questions. Thanks. Deco 23:43, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Why the deletion?

Why did You delete the material on the use of osteons in ageing, sexing, etc.?

[edit] Osteon history note is not incorrect

I don't know why you think it appears incorrect. For references, see, e.g., D. Ruscillo (ed.) Ageing and Sexing in Zooarchaeology. Oxbow Press. Okeh, the formatting is wrong, but I can't help that: I have written before that Wik is hard to understand - I followed the directions - sometimes the formatting is ofkeh, sometimes it isn't - I don't know why.

[edit] Help!

Hi, Jag.

   You offered to help.  My first question is how do I use the help page.  When I open up to the dialogue page, I cannot type in the heading or body spaces - How do I activate them.

  Another question:  When I enter text in for a new article, sometimes it appears messed up, and sometimes it appears the way I typed it.  What are the secrets of formatting?  Wik is so complicated and convoluted that I have a hard time finding the simplest instructions (and can't remember where they are unless I happen to go back there within a few days).  One specific change I'd like to see (and please don't ask me to make it, since I don't know how) is to have a separate listing for adding articles rather than hiding that information (which is unclear enough) under "editing."  (Sorry if this is a repeat.)

211.225.32.225 07:56, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Whoops

So, why isn't my login giving my username (kdammers) rather than the i.p. number? The text I just wrote is an example of what sometimes (but not always) happens to my texts. 211.225.32.225 07:59, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stem cells

Could you just take a look on the discussion page on Pluripotential hemopoietic stem cell. Believe some word are incorrect.

[edit] Regarding 'Pluripotential Hemopoietic Stem Cell'.

The definitions of the CFUs contradict the definitions in my histology textbook. Check out the talk page for details.

[edit] lots of edits, not an admin

Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 22:57, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Featured Diagrams

There is a discussion going on at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates because I brought up the idea that maybe we should create a "Featured Diagram" listing similar to the Featured Pictures listing. I have long been of the mind that diagrams/charts aren't really in the same category as featured pictures, so I made the suggestion that there be a new index of charts/diagrams (possibly titled Featured Diagrams) for that type of image. I was just wondering if you had any thoughts on this? We're discussing this on the Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates page, so if you have any comments, please let us know. --ScottyBoy900Q 22:20, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Email?

Hi Jag, my German account doesn't work on this site, so I cannot use your email form. I would like to print one of your pictures in a magazine and kindly request you to contact me. Yours, Lumi 84.190.209.198 16:02, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pseudo-category on your .js page

Your monobook.js page includes the string "[ [Category:" (without the embedded space), which confuses the WP software and induces that page's inclusion in a bogus category. You might want to modify the program to read, instead, "[" + "[Category:". Matchups 04:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cytochrome P450 oxidase page

The image of a structural model is labeled incorrectly. It is labeled as CYP 2E1 but it is really CYP 2C9. There hasn't been a published 2E1 model yet.

[edit] HMG-CoA fix

Thanks for your great images on cholesterol synthesis. Recently on Talk:HMG-CoA reductase pathway an anonymous user noted a small error in HMG-CoA's structure in Image:Cholesterol-Synthesis-Reaction1.png (which was extracted from Image:Cholesterol-Synthesis-Complete.png, so it needs fixing too). Basically, carbon six needs to be replaced with a hydroxyl group. If you could take a look at this, it'd be much appreciated. Best, David Iberri (talk) 14:56, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Myoglobin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Myoglobin.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 10:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] French for the mentally challenged

It's no joke. Check out this Montréal website[1], and in particular, take a look at the "Ortograf altêrnatif". The Jade Knight 00:11, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Aconitine.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Aconitine.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 09:49, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image: Luciferase from the firefly

Hi Jag, this is Luziferase from the german Wikipedia. I like to complete the german article about the luciferase. For this I need a nice picture from the protein. Now my question: Can Iuse your picture in this article? I won't modify it or copy it for other things! I only want to present it in the german version of luciferase. Please answer me on the following page: talk of Luziferase. Thank you for aour time, Luziferase

[edit] Film-stub

Hi there Jag! I followed a "what links here" link to your User:Jag123/Template:WL-Stubs page. If that's for your own reference, would you mind changing {{movie-stub}} to {{film-stub}}, which is the template currently in use? Thanks - Her Pegship (tis herself) 05:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Request for comments

There is a request for comments on the Robert Latimer page; please see Talk:Robert Latimer#Request for comments. Rosemary Amey 23:26, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] stereochemistry error

[edit] Image:Sphingosine-Synthesis.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sphingosine-Synthesis.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Roadnottaken 16:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Diels-alder.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Diels-alder.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 16:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)