User talk:JacquesNguyen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of Bugeaud.
Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

Contents

[edit] Improper moves

You've made several improper moves by copying and pasting contents to new articles and redirecting their old names to the new names. This is discouraged since it loses the page's history. To make a proper move, use the "move" tab at the beginning of the article. If you're unable to move an article this way, ask an administrator for help. DHN 09:12, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nguyễn Dynasty

You have been involved in a revert war at the Nguyễn Dynasty page. I have protected the page so that you may discuss the issue at Talk:Nguyễn Dynasty. Thanks in advance. --Bradeos Graphon (talk) 22:55, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Người Rừng

Người Rừng: page has been created. Searching for Nguoi Rung will take you to it. Cheers, Master of Puppets Care to share? 05:24, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Sure. Just go to the page you want to redirect to another page and type #REDIRECT [[Page]]. For example, if you wanted to redirect your user page to your talk page, you would go to User:JacquesNguyen and type #REDIRECT User talk:JacquesNguyen. Cheers, Master of Puppets Care to share? 19:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RE:Moves

I'm looking into it; since the moves are technically impossible for me to make, as I'm not an administrator, I'm putting them up at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Cheers and thanks for bringing these to my attention, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 01:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Nevermind, an administrator has moved Khuc family. The other two should follow shortly. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 01:26, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Korean history template

Hi, JacquesNguyen!

I noticed that you have re-inserted the French campaign thing in the Korean history template. I think that's a relatively minor issue that is better covered by the Timeline of Korean history article. The other events in the template are major ones that covered the entire territory and changed the political status of Korea. The French campaign is important, but if we include everything else as important as that, the template would be almost as long as the timeline! Chuniac (talk) 23:49, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Gia Long. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Badagnani (talk) 23:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Mạc Dynasty. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Badagnani (talk) 23:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Mạc Dynasty, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Badagnani (talk) 23:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Hàm Nghi. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Badagnani (talk) 23:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Hàm Nghi, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Badagnani (talk) 23:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Lê Thánh Tông, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Badagnani (talk) 23:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Hội An, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Badagnani (talk) 00:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Hội An, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Badagnani (talk) 00:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Hội An, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Badagnani (talk) 01:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nationality

I didn't ask your nationality; please don't ask mine, thanks. I am a citizen of the world and respect all cultures equally (and wish them all to be thoroughly documented at Wikipedia, without any selective omissions or blanking). Badagnani (talk) 00:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. —Travistalk 02:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating WP:3RR on Hội An, edit warring and move warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Nishkid64 (talk) 05:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I believe a consensus was established that the pages on Wikipedia should not be titled with Vietnamese diacritics. Please re-seek consensus if you wish to contest this matter; do not blindly move pages as you have been doing in the past. Nishkid64 (talk) 05:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Nguyễn Dynasty. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Badagnani (talk) 05:26, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Japanese expansion

The article is predominantly to explain what's informally (though quite often) known as the "Japanese Blitzkrieg", the rapid attack on Southeast Asia which opened the Pacific War. If you want to include French Indochina, by all means, feel free to add it to the background section of the article. Oberiko (talk) 21:21, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, I actually kind of just put that article together as a place-holder for the moment, right now the World War II article is taking most of my time. Any fixes are, of course, welcome. Oberiko (talk) 22:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] List of countries by formation dates

Please stop adding fringe theory information on that page, as you did a few times already (and I think probably once as an IP too). There is a definite difference between Egypt and China on the one hand and your entry on the other. There are a lot of primary and secondary sources asserting statehood building in those areas at such an early time and enough primary and secondary sources creating a link between those early states and the present-day countries. Your source is a geocities site. That is simply not trustworthy enough, as anyone can put one up.

I will be the first to acknowledge that some entries on that page smack of jingoistic re-interpretation of history. I have commented on the talk page already about this and no, I was not even the one who put the POV flag there. But the fact that we do not seem to be able to get rid of that POV should not be a pretext to add further POV, which makes the article even more unreliable. I would suggest that you are infringing WP:POINT. If you do not agree with what was consensus on the country you are editing, try to find reputable sources which support a better version - as there seems to be a consensus against your version on that page (evidenced by the fact, that quite a number of completely unrelated users have by now reverted you) the burden of proof is on you. And please do not use blogs or other webpages that anyone may have written as a source. All the best.--Paul Pieniezny (talk) 11:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -- UKPhoenix79 (talk) 08:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sassanid Empire

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Sassanid Empire. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you have copied information into other articles, please remove that text now. Thank you, Kingturtle (talk) 22:57, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Help

I cannot upload that image, because 1)I am not the owner of that image 2)there is no original source mentioned in that page. English Wikipedia does not have licensing such as Template:CopyrightedFreeUse as mentioned in the other language Wikipedia. If you are a contributor in that Wikipedia, please contact the person who uploaded that image and ask him the information such as where he/she got that image, who is the owner. Also, if that uploader himself can upload the image in Wiki commons, then the image can be used Wikipedias of all the languages. Hope this helps. - KNM Talk 02:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The picture

thumb|200px|right Here you are Jacques. You can use the picture now on English Wikipedia. BUT be shore to input the source and description. I couldn't because I don't understand Vietnamese. Regards. --Revizionist (talk) 08:45, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Hùng Vương. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Badagnani (talk) 01:06, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Hùng Vương has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Sceptre (talk) 01:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Hùng Vương, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Badagnani (talk) 04:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

You have now reverted the same edit 5 times in a 24-hour period. Please restore the text you blanked or I will have to report you for violating WP:3RR. Best, Badagnani (talk) 04:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Red Chinese

Hi guy! There is a Red Chinese here:

Angelo De La Paz (talk) 16:19, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Add this article to your watchlist

Hi guy!

I think you may be interested in this. Please add this article to your watchlist as soon as possible.

Thank you so much and best wishes to you!

Angelo De La Paz (talk) 03:43, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Indefblocked

The consistent history of harassment, POV pushing, using multiple accounts to evade sanctions and basically this user's labelling every edit disagreed with "vandalism" has led me to finally block them indefinitely. Enough is enough. --Bradeos Graphon Βραδέως Γράφων (talk) 22:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Fuck you, Fuck Chinese.