User talk:Jack
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'm very inactive at the moment. I will eventually respond to messages, though.
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user to whom this talk page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jack. |
This is the user talk page for Jack, where you can send messages and comments to Jack. |
|
|
Archives |
July 2007. August 2007. September 2007. October 2007. November 2007. |
[edit] Wikipedia Weekly Episode 36
Hey! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 36 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/11/30/wikipedia-weekly-36/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 04:09, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
[edit] Thanks
HI! I just wanted to say thanks for the nice compliment you left me on my Guest Book about my userpage. :) ~ Bella Swan 00:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 3, Issue 49 | 3 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Transhumanist RfA
Hi. Perhaps it's my mistake, but I think you missed something in TT's answer to Q3. Would you mind returning to the RfA and double checking? Of course you're entitled to oppose, and you might still choose to do so even if I'm right, but I hope you'll agree it's good if stated reasons for objection are soundly based. Thanks. --Dweller 10:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- I don't see exactly where he or you state the answer. Could you direct me directly to the thing you're referring to? I'm not thinking straight. :P Jack?! 11:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hi. Thanks for taking the time and trouble to review. I appreciate it. In my nom, as TT refers in his answer to Q3, I harked back to the heated MfD he was involved in before his first RfA. That's a long wiki-time ago now. In his Q3 answer, he also gave some diffs for some more conflicts - this time, they're both recent and, IMHO, well-handled. I also gave quite a bit of space in my nom to my disagreement with him over the FLC... I thought he was heading for his old bad ways of conflict, but he gloriously disproved me. Perhaps I should have said so in my nom, but I think that his final comment to me is exactly what Wikipedia is about... debate your position hard, listen to your "opposition" and if there's merit in their position, take it on board graciously. He did all of the above and remained civil. I actually think there's quite a lot packed into a small area in his Q3 answer. (NB you may also want to check out his conflict resolution skills at the Paytakan dispute, which he handled masterfully - it's a model of dispute resolution) --Dweller 11:22, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hey again, it's no problem at all. I see those diffs now. I will be changing to support per this conversation, but I still would recommend mentioning his previous conflicts more full on, as they don't seem to be mentioned, but they are acknowledged. Jack?! 11:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, I'll be changing to just neutral. See the reasons I give there. Jack?! 11:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- As I said above, all I was looking for was for you to review your comment. That you decided to change your !vote in any way is beyond the call of duty. Thank you very much. --Dweller 12:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hi. Thanks for taking the time and trouble to review. I appreciate it. In my nom, as TT refers in his answer to Q3, I harked back to the heated MfD he was involved in before his first RfA. That's a long wiki-time ago now. In his Q3 answer, he also gave some diffs for some more conflicts - this time, they're both recent and, IMHO, well-handled. I also gave quite a bit of space in my nom to my disagreement with him over the FLC... I thought he was heading for his old bad ways of conflict, but he gloriously disproved me. Perhaps I should have said so in my nom, but I think that his final comment to me is exactly what Wikipedia is about... debate your position hard, listen to your "opposition" and if there's merit in their position, take it on board graciously. He did all of the above and remained civil. I actually think there's quite a lot packed into a small area in his Q3 answer. (NB you may also want to check out his conflict resolution skills at the Paytakan dispute, which he handled masterfully - it's a model of dispute resolution) --Dweller 11:22, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Details
Hi Jack, if you're looking at RFAs from before your rename, then unless those RFAs have been retroactively been changed to include your new name, you'll still see the old names. This is because the RFA Analysis tools simply read the RFA pages as-is. Does this answer your question? Cheers, Tangotango (talk) 19:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Trivial AWB edits
Please don't do trivial edits like this one with AWB: [1] Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser#Rules_of_use says: "Avoid making insignificant or inconsequential edits such as only adding or removing some white space, moving a stub tag..." Haukur (talk) 23:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signing my guestbook
Thanks for Signing, cheers! Sirkad(Talk) 23:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
The Guest Book Barnstar | |
This barnstar is awarded to Jack for signing Sirkad's Guestbook. |
[edit] GatoClass RfA
You note that the answer to Q1 did not change - I pointed out that he addressed the issue again in Q5. Take a look and see if his clarification makes any difference to your decision. AvruchTalk 18:37, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Really, really bad haiku from a new admin
Setting new lows in thank-you spam:
Jack, thanks so much for your strong support.[2] I look forward to living up the trust you and others have placed in me. --A. B. (talk) 22:29, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Great success
[edit] Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 3, Issue 50 | 10 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hello
Hey, Thanks for the welcome :)
--Mr kc (talk) 12:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] My RfA
For the two administrators whom I talked with, Kmccoy has already come forward as one of the administrators that approved of it. The one who didn't have a problem with it is a regular in #cvn-wp-en. -- Cobi(t|c|b|cn) 00:14, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Card
-- Vintei Talk 01:23, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia Weekly Episodes 37 and 38
Well, gee whiz! I don't check WP:WEEKLY for a few days and look what happens: I miss two new episodes. Nonetheless, Wikipedia Weekly Episode 37 and Episode 38 have been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/12/10/wikipedia-weekly-37-rundown/ and http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/12/14/episode-38-interview-wbrianna-laugher/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 02:03, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
[edit] Card
Σpsilon60198 我聪明! 05:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 3, Issue 51 | 17 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 19:01, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia Weekly Episode 39
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 39 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2007/12/18/episode-39-knol-pointer/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 06:18, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
[edit] Merry Christmas
Marlith T/C 00:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Adopter
Hi Jack,
I've started to clean up the Adopters' list. You appear to have changed username since you added yourself to the list but not updated your info there. In case you're still interested, can you kindly update your information? Or, if you're not interested any more, would you mind removing yourself? Thank you and happy editing, Snowolf How can I help? 22:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)~~
- Thanks, Snowolf. I updated my name and activity. I'm currently a bit inactive due to a hectic school work schedule, the Christmas holidays and other reasons. For these reasons I am a bit inactive at the moment, but I hope to be back soon. Thanks for informing me, and sorry for forgetting! Jack?! 23:31, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Elonka 3
Thank you for your support in my RfA. It was definitely a dramatic debate! I paid close attention to everything that was said, and, where possible, I will try to incorporate the (constructive) criticism towards being a better administrator. I'm taking things slowly for now, partially because it's the holiday season and there are plenty of off-wiki distractions. :) I'm also working my way through the Wikipedia:New admin school and double-checking the relevant policies, and will gradually phase into the use of the new tools. My main goals are to help out with various backlogs, but I also fully intend to keep on writing articles, as there are several more that I definitely want to get to WP:FA status! Thanks again, Elonka 07:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Merry Christmas
Merry Christmas, Jack! Wishing you a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year! Best regards from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee and myself! -- Idontknow610 (WANNA SIGN??) 10:53, 24 December 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] Barnstar
User:D.M.N./Signature Barnstar Cheers, Davnel03Sign It, Junior! 14:19, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 3, Issue 52 | 26 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] League of Copyeditors roll call
Greetings from the League of Copyeditors. Your name is listed on our members page, but we are unsure how many of the people listed there are still active contributors to the League's activities. If you are still interested in participating in the work of the League, please follow the instructions at the members page to add your name to the active members list. Once you have done that, you might want to familiarise yourself with the new requests system, which has replaced the old /proofreading subpage. As the old system is now deprecated, the main efforts of the League should be to clear the substantial backlog which still exists there. The League's services are in as high demand as ever, as evinced by the increasing backlog on our requests pages, both old and new. While FA and GA reviewers regularly praise the League's contributions to reviewed articles, we remain perennially understaffed. Fulfilling requests to polish the prose of Wikipedia's highest-profile articles is a way that editors can make a very noticeable difference to the appearance of the encyclopedia. On behalf of the League, if you do consider yourself to have left, I hope you will consider rejoining; if you consider yourself inactive, I hope you will consider returning to respond to just one request per week, or as many as you can manage. Merry Christmas and happy editing, The League of Copyeditors. |
Melon‑Bot (STOP!) 18:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers January 2008 Newsletter
The Red Hot Chili Peppers WikiProject Newsletter Volume 2, no. 1 — January 2008 |
|
|
Since our last newsletter was sent in October, several new contributors have joined the project: Jack, Pifko87, Dihydrogen Monoxide and Kasperkohler.
|
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Red Hot Chili Peppers. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or want to receive it in a different form, please contact the publishers. This newsletter was delivered by the automated xihix(talk) 05:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC) .
[edit] Wikipedia:Changing username/Assistance
Hi Jack. I've removed you from the list of active users providing assistances at WP:USURP and WP:RENAME because you haven't recently made any clerk edits. If this is a mistake, please re-add yourself to the list. Thanks, Mønobi 22:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for January 2nd and 7th, 2008.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 4, Issue 1 | 2 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
Volume 4, Issue 2 | 7 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Rollback
Hello Jack, I have granted rollback rights to your account. The reason for this is that, after a review of some of your contributions, I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended use of reverting vandalism: I do not believe you will abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck. Acalamari 19:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 4, Issue 3 | 14 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:AlkalineLogo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:AlkalineLogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:18, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Coheed and Cambria logo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Coheed and Cambria logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:46, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 4, Issue 4 | 21 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:51, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia Weekly Episode 40
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 40 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/01/24/episode-40-wikipedias-genetic-makeup/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 05:35, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
[edit] RE:Your Retirement
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHY DID YOU LEAVE??? WHYY!!!!!! Are you having problems at home or something? Σpsilon60198 我聪明! 03:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks for your concern. Everything is fine with me, I just don't have the time to edit Wikipedia anymore. My activity slowly decreased before, but recently my PC broke, which made me just stop editing completely. There's nothing Wikipedia is losing by me leaving, but thankyou for your concern. All the best, Jack?! 17:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 4, Issue 5 | 28 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:43, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User:Jack/ABs
Hi, Jack.
-
- I've updated User:Jack/ABs it still had my former username Dust Rider on the list, i've changed it to my new username hope you don't mind. Terra Terra's talkpage 20:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia Weekly Episode 41
Wikipedia Weekly Episode 41 has been released!
.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/02/04/episode-41-setting-the-record-straight/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP 23:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.
[edit] Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 4, Issue 6 | 4 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:05, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Hanukkah
A tag has been placed on Template:Hanukkah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User:Jack/ABs.
Hi, just wanted to tell you that various discussions were held, and determined that lists of signature/autograph books should not exist (there were several lists, and even a category: all were deleted, as far as I know). I won't be rude and delete it (though I did remove my own book from the list), I'm just letting you know... Of course, there's always U1. ;) · AndonicO Hail! 00:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia Weekly Episode 42
Hey there. Just this note that Wikipedia Weekly Episode 42 is out.
You can download the episode or listen to the streaming audio at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/03/03/episode-42-the-question-of-muhammad-the-wikiand-everything/, and you can hear past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/ too.
For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP (talk) 21:46, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
If you no longer wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from that list.
[edit] User:Jack/ABs
You removed the link to add your name to the list for the Guestbook. That's a bit sad. I like it anyway. Chubbennaitor (leave me a message!) 16:12, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
No you haven't. It hasn't changed. Well I hope you can change it back to how it was soon. Chubbennaitor (leave me a message!) 20:56, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AB's
Hey. I would just like to say i want to help you organize User:Jack/ABs when people add new names e.t.c. Put them in the right lines. Also can we have a limit of how long peoples names are allowed to be? :D Some of them went onto 2 lines so i added the <small></small> tags. I hope this helps. If you would like to send a reply to this please message me on my talk page Thanks. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 07:32, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WikipediaWeekly Episode 45
Hello again! Just a note that WikipediaWeekly Episode 45 has been released. Listen and comment at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/04/14/wikipedia-weekly-45-blps-revisited/. Cheers, WODUP 20:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you no longer wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from that list.
[edit] A question
Im trying to make my homepage. any tips on how to get pictures and stuff? 124.170.58.198 (talk)
04:33, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Do me a favor?
Can you please block 69.113.79.227 for me? I don't know how to block people andi've heard you've blocked people. RogueMad2 (talk) 05:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia Weekly Episodes 46 and 47
Just a quick note: Wikipedia Weekly Episodes 46 and 47 are out. A good listen as always. :) Cheers, WODUP 03:18, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
You're receiving this because you're listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.
[edit] WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - May 2008
The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 10:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - May 2008
The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 10:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Backlog at Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user
[edit] Wikipedia Weekly Episode 48
Hey there! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 48, Wikipedia Weekly's third talk with Jimmy Wales, is now available. Listen or download MP3 and OGG versions at the episode's page.
- Have a comment about the episode? You can leave your comment right on the episode's page!
- Miss an episode? Catch up in the Wikipedia Weekly archives at wikipediaweekly.org!
- Know someone who would love Wikipedia Weekly? Tell them about it!
- Care to participate in a podcast? Sign up here!
For the Wikipedia Weekly team, WODUPbot 23:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
You're receiving this because you're listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.
[edit] Wikipedia Weekly Episode 49
Good news! Wikipedia Weekly Episode 49 is now available. Listen or download MP3 and OGG versions at the episode's page.
- Have a comment about the episode? You can leave your comment right on the episode's page!
- Miss an episode? Catch up in the Wikipedia Weekly archives at wikipediaweekly.org!
- Know someone who would love Wikipedia Weekly? Tell them about it!
- Care to participate in a podcast? Sign up here!
For the Wikipedia Weekly team, WODUPbot 22:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
You're receiving this because you're listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.
[edit] Award
The SimsFan Special Thank You Award | ||
There you go. Thanks for signing my guestbook. SimsFanTalk • Centre of Ops • Sign and Get Award 07:07, 20 May 2008 (UTC) |
[edit] Barnstar
The Guestbook Barnstar | ||
For creating ABs. What does ABs stand for? Chubbennaitor 21:11, 28 May 2008 (UTC) |
It's ok! I like signing peoples autograph pages. And to be honest it isn't big compared to others. Some of the people up there like me might not have signed until they realised they could. Chubbennaitor 09:01, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia Weekly Episode 50
It may not be weekly, but Wikipedia Weekly has finally reached Episode 50! Listen or download MP3 and OGG versions at the episode's page.
- Have a comment about the episode? You can leave your comment right on the episode's page!
- Miss an episode? Catch up in the Wikipedia Weekly archives at wikipediaweekly.org!
- Know someone who would love Wikipedia Weekly? Tell them about it!
- Care to participate in a podcast? Sign up here!
For the Wikipedia Weekly team, WODUPbot 00:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
You're receiving this because you're listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.
[edit] WikiProject Yorkshire - June 2008 Newsletter
The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Yorkshire - June 2008 Newsletter
The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Clearing it up
Response from my talkpage: Sure, I can clear up my response, thanks for asking! Adminship takes no more time out of one's schedule than editing. Perhaps that particular user should be doing something else (exams, work, whatever) than editing, but instead that editor chooses to volunteer his time to edit/add/build Wikipedia. So do I. It isn't really a valid reason to oppose someone's bid for adminship, it's like saying you "shouldn't volunteer". We're all volunteers. Just my thoughts, I didn't mean to come across bitey or accusational, just wondering if there was anything else you were opposing for beyond "you should be studying". Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick and clear response! Well, I just feel that the way in which he wrote "Wikipedia takes up a large chunk of my time; i should be revising for exams at the moment.." comes across as saying how it is a bad thing that it takes up so much time. I am also speaking from past experiences, Wikipedia can become addictive, and I feel especially for a new admin. Jack?! 22:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- (I'll keep this here, I don't like split messages, and now I can see you don't either! :-) I don't disagree that Wikipedia can be quite addictive! But it's what this editor chooses to do with his time. I understand your position a bit better now, but I'll reiterate that adminning is nothing special, and takes no more time or effort than editing. I would recommend if you revisit, that you should move to neutral, but do what you will based on your own criteria. Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:06, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- You do make some very good points. I think I shall move to neutral. I started with oppose mainly because I am in a similar position to Ironaces: I have exams coming up. I cannot support though and still this fact comes across as a bad thing to me. I just feel that users in his position really should focus on exams. I don't find much time to come on Wikipedia anymore, and if Ironaces edits at a similar pace to me, he won't do many admin tasks, and I've always dis-liked it when users become admins and make only several edits a week. I would also like to say this was a very pleasent discussion, and you are very clear, easy to talk to and polite. Thanks. Jack?! 22:10, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know what to say other than thank you, you're welcome, and thank you! Have a great day, happy editing, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:13, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- You do make some very good points. I think I shall move to neutral. I started with oppose mainly because I am in a similar position to Ironaces: I have exams coming up. I cannot support though and still this fact comes across as a bad thing to me. I just feel that users in his position really should focus on exams. I don't find much time to come on Wikipedia anymore, and if Ironaces edits at a similar pace to me, he won't do many admin tasks, and I've always dis-liked it when users become admins and make only several edits a week. I would also like to say this was a very pleasent discussion, and you are very clear, easy to talk to and polite. Thanks. Jack?! 22:10, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- (I'll keep this here, I don't like split messages, and now I can see you don't either! :-) I don't disagree that Wikipedia can be quite addictive! But it's what this editor chooses to do with his time. I understand your position a bit better now, but I'll reiterate that adminning is nothing special, and takes no more time or effort than editing. I would recommend if you revisit, that you should move to neutral, but do what you will based on your own criteria. Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:06, 9 June 2008 (UTC)