User talk:JackOfHearts/Archive 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 Re: Pig Mask
2 Re:Merge
3 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:XavierSawII.jpg
4 List of Saw Traps
5 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:S3eric3.jpg
6 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rigg2.jpg
7 Merry Christmas!
8 User:Yeldarb68
9 It's probably me being a bit of an idiot...
10 Gordon's Fate
11 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Doctorgordonsaw.PNG
12 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AddisonSaw2.jpg
13 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DamienOmen.jpg
14 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GlennPlummer.jpg
15 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gluttony Unleashed.png
16 Hoffman Article
17 Orphaned non-free media (Image:JeffWakesInCrate.JPG)
18 AfD nomination of Hoffman (Saw)
19 WikiProject Saw January Newsletter
20 Hoffman
21 AfD nomination of Pig mask
22 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SawBillyDoll.jpg
23 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shawneesmithjigsawtrap.PNG
24 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SpacekCarrieBlood.jpg
25 Orphaned non-free media (Image:AMYirvingCarrie.jpg)
26 Orphaned non-free media (Image:RageSnellClose.JPG)
27 Orphaned non-free media (Image:SueSNellCarrieRemake.jpg)
28 Image:LarryFootSawIII.PNG
29 AfD nomination of Sue Snell
30 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CARRIE2002.JPG
31 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CARRIEnoveSTYLE.jpg
32 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Carri2005spilled.jpg
33 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CarrieSpaceckProm.jpg
34 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CarrieWhiteStressed2005.jpg
35 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Duchess.JPG
36 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kerrysaw.PNG
37 Orphaned non-free media (Image:VFMF.jpg)

[edit] Re: Pig Mask

It looks pretty good to me, although I don't know what satisfies notability requirements and what doesn't. Try creating it and see what happens. (One question...was it ever specified that the pig mask originated with the fair?)--CyberGhostface (talk) 23:59, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Merge

I'm not sure myself. I suppose "Gordon family" like we did for Jeff and Lynn might work, but as for merging Lawrence and Adam I wouldn't know how to go for it.--CyberGhostface (talk) 22:30, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:XavierSawII.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:XavierSawII.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of Saw Traps

Hello. I noticed that you reverted my changes to List of traps in the Saw film series. While I do agree that the victims' character flaws are important, I was concerned about the lack of conformity in the phrasing of each trap; some opened with "This trap involved . . . it was applied to", while others jumped right to the victim. Sometimes the trap's characteristics were outlined and then the way it played out was discussed, while other sections simply meshed the two subjects together. I guess I'm a control freak and hate things unstandardized, but I wanted to fix that problem by eliminating the focus of the characters altogether.

You do have a point in saying that the characters are integral to the traps, as they are personalized. But I do propose that there be unity in the way the information is presented. I'm going to revert to my original revision (with a few minor changes, including moving the picture to the top of the article), since a lot of my good edits were also lost. Any thoughts on your part?

--65.35.157.31 (talk) 01:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:S3eric3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:S3eric3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rigg2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rigg2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Merry Christmas!

CyberGhostface (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Don't overdo it on the fudge!

Spread the Holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaminglawyer/MerryChristmas!}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

[edit] User:Yeldarb68

He/she is a little bit edit-happy today and is removing large chunks from the Saw articles...--CyberGhostface (talk) 19:45, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] It's probably me being a bit of an idiot...

But could you elaborate more on why you put Hoffman back in? I'm not trying to be confrontational or anything, I'm genuinely curious. I can understand the point that Jigsaw couldn't have made them but why couldn't Amanda know? Unfortunately I don't have access to the script and as such don't know much about the whole "misled to believe it was Art" thing. So illuminating me would be very much appreciated. Despite that I still have a bit of a minor niggle calling Hoffman an apprentice as he could very well have been in the same boat as Art for whatever reason. Thanks Agent452 (talk) 23:53, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that. But didn't Amanda know Eric was alive...after all didn't she leave him screaming after in Saw 3? I'm not exactly thinking clearly...after all it is Christmas still. Either way I understand now but will have to think of a nice phrase saying Hoffman may not be a new apprentice (as obvious as it seems) Agent452 (talk) 00:06, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gordon's Fate

In the Saw commentary, Leigh Whannel asks Elwes what he thinks happened to his character. Elwes says that he thinks that Gordon probably died from blood loss in the hallway. Is that worth mentioning in the article?--CyberGhostface (talk) 21:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Doctorgordonsaw.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Doctorgordonsaw.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AddisonSaw2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AddisonSaw2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DamienOmen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DamienOmen.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GlennPlummer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GlennPlummer.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gluttony Unleashed.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Gluttony Unleashed.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Hoffman Article

You probably already know but the article is up for deletion as it's not notable enough. You seem to be able to get plenty of outside information so I was hoping you could add something or perhaps give me some kind of pointer as to where I or some other editor could find decent quality reference-able info. Thanks Agent452 (talk) 22:46, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:JeffWakesInCrate.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:JeffWakesInCrate.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Hoffman (Saw)

An editor has nominated Hoffman (Saw), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoffman (Saw) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Saw January Newsletter

The WikiProject Saw Newsletter
Issue III - January 2008

Happy New Year, everyone!

Not much of a newsletter for today...I just wanted to report that OfficialSaw.com's website has undergone a massive renovation and has added character profiles and trap descriptions and the like. Why am I telling you this? Because it appears that our Wikipedia articles have been used for the site! (Check out the House of Jigsaw history section for one example). So feel proud, knowing that the articles that you have worked on have garnered notice from the folks at LionsGate...

--CyberGhostface (talk) 16:16, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hoffman

Do you want to try remaking his article once Saw V comes along?--CyberGhostface (talk) 16:24, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Well it appears out friend Otto has now nominated Pig mask for deletion.--CyberGhostface (talk) 21:00, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Pig mask

An editor has nominated Pig mask, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pig mask and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SawBillyDoll.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SawBillyDoll.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shawneesmithjigsawtrap.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Shawneesmithjigsawtrap.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SpacekCarrieBlood.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SpacekCarrieBlood.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:AMYirvingCarrie.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:AMYirvingCarrie.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:RageSnellClose.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:RageSnellClose.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:SueSNellCarrieRemake.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SueSNellCarrieRemake.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

[edit] Image:LarryFootSawIII.PNG

I have tagged Image:LarryFootSawIII.PNG as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 22:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Sue Snell

I have nominated Sue Snell, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sue Snell. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. hbdragon88 (talk) 08:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CARRIE2002.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:CARRIE2002.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CARRIEnoveSTYLE.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CARRIEnoveSTYLE.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Carri2005spilled.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Carri2005spilled.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CarrieSpaceckProm.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CarrieSpaceckProm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CarrieWhiteStressed2005.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CarrieWhiteStressed2005.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Duchess.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Duchess.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kerrysaw.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Kerrysaw.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:VFMF.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:VFMF.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).