User talk:Jack1956

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is Jack1956's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Jack1956.

Contents

[edit] HELP US MAKING THE PROJECT OF ANCIENT GREEK WIKIPEDIA

We are the promoters of the Wikipedia in Ancient Greek. we need your help, specially for write NEW ARTICLES and the TRANSLATION OF THE MEDIAWIKI INTERFACE FOR ANCIENT GREEK, for demonstrating, to the language subcommittee, the value of our project.

Thanks a lot for your help. Ἡ Οὐικιπαιδεία needs you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.40.197.5 (talk) 19:55, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hulme's birthdate

Can you add a birthdate to his article, or at least a year? Best regards, -- Ssilvers 17:08, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hulme

Thanks. If you see any other relevant references, please add them. Best regards, -- Ssilvers 18:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Priory School (Hitchin)

I've fixed your AfD nomination for this page, as it was not showing up properly on the AfD page. When setting up an AfD, it's generally best to click on the "Preloaded debate" link from the AfD header. This will put in the header and templates properly so that you don't have to do it by hand. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:40, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 4QMMT

Thanks for this article Jack! You may like to have a glance at Tanakh at Qumran. Perhaps you could help fill in the blanks, or create articles for some of the more interesting mss listed. Better still, companion articles listing important sub-groups of the DSS would be great. Anyway, you know your priorities best. I'm thrilled they overlapped with some of mine leading you to provide such an informative and clear article at Wiki. Shalom. Alastair Haines 09:42, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Parson's Tale

Thank you for your comment. Interesting old cove, wsn't he? So unselfish about his work. A picture would be good. The son, Eric Templeton Lummis, may well turn out be worth an article too (D-Day hero and CO of his father's old regiment, minor military historian etc). Still... illegitimus non carborundum.  ← ROGER →  TALK 14:04, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the pic.  ← ROGER →  TALK 18:33, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] John Marco Allegro image

Your image has been copied to Commons where it will be available to all the other Wikipedias besides the English. If you can provide some additional information about the photograph, i.e. where it was taken, perhaps the context, but more importantly, what year, please do so on the image page at Commons. __meco 07:08, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Silly me!

I didn't remember your user page, now I see why you already knew all the Wiki drill. <blush> Anyway, thanks for "polishing the handle so carefully ... soon you'll be the ruler of the Queen's Navy!" I do hope you didn't kiss Emanuel Tov! Seriously though, I really appreciate you pitching in to chip away at a huge topic. You've educated me already! Shalom Alastair Haines 10:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Priory School

Your first edit was the right one. The Hitchin Priory School was deleted as per the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Priory School (Hitchin). Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 03:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] John Strugnell

Thanks for checking in with John Strugnell. I moved the image back to right alignment. See also Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Images and Wikipedia:Guide_to_layout#Images. Per the comments by User:Ihutchesson, WP:BLP would allow me to reduce this article to a stub as the claims are poorly sourced. Please help add inline sources to this article. Thanks. —Viriditas | Talk 03:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Good work! —Viriditas | Talk 10:34, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hello

I breaks my heart that a Greek is not Orthodox but such is the world thank you for your contribution on Blessed Sophrony. Could you look at the most beloved Vladimir Lossky and the article I have created for him Father Nikolia Lossky. Also could you give me a vote of confidence on my article The First International Conference of Neoplatonism and Gnosticism. LoveMonkey 01:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Sure here's one that St Catherine's in communion with Rome. LoveMonkey 19:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] British Crimean War Medal

Hello there. Firstly, many thanks for your contributions to the above article - always nice to see someone take an interest in the area of campaign medals. I note that you recently moved this page from its old location at Crimea Medal to British Crimean War Medal. The general convention for medals is to use the actual medal name, with a national disambigator if the medal name is shared between countries (eg XXX Medal (United Kindgom), etc). I take it that you had the Ottoman Crimean medal in mind when making this move, but in this case the official name of the UK medal is the 'Crimea Medal' (which, to the best of my knowledge, is not a shared name) - the page move really tends to cloud the whole issue.

Best wishes, Xdamrtalk 23:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Clowns

Thank you for expanding the article on Charlie Cairoli; it's always nice to see people adding material to an article that you created, you know?

As for your initial creation of a separate article under the misspelling "Charlie Caroli" - don't worry about it. If you make that sort of mistake again, you don't need to request that your version be deleted; just add the content to the earlier article (which you did), and change the new version into a redirect. DS 14:04, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)

The August 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gennaro Rubino

"however, a family in the UK claim to be descended from him through a daughter, so it would seem that on his release from prison he returned to London, an area he was already familiar with, and married."

Where does this information come from? Also, doesn't it seem more likely that he would have fathered a daughter before the attempted assassination (when he lived in London) rather than after he was sentenced to life imprisonment? Kaldari 15:51, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

P.S. - I just ordered an academic journal from Italy that supposedly has more details about Rubino's life. Kaldari 17:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Wow, that's fascinating. If you could let her know that I am currently doing research on Rubino, I would love to hear from her. He is a figure of some intrigue due to the unsettled mystery of his true loyalties. He claimed to be allied with the anarchists, but worked for the Italian secret service to spy on them (although perhaps as a double agent). Also, your student may be unaware of the article recently published about Rubino since it was published in a very obscure Italian journal (devoted to the history of the city Rubino was born in). I would certainly love to trade a translation of the journal article for information about Rubino's family and perhaps even his life after prison. I will send you my email address and snail mail address and perhaps you could pass them along to her. I would be very glad to hear from her or even her grandmother (if she is still alive). Kaldari 22:56, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
No, unfortunately I haven't heard anything from the family yet. Thanks for passing along the date and place of death. It's good to know that at least :) If you talk to your student again, perhaps you could ask if the family knows Rubino's date of birth as well. Right now, I only know it was in the year 1859 (and even that is not quite certain). Kaldari 14:39, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Finally received the Italian journal with the article about Rubino. The article is 8 pages long (more than I was expecting) and even includes a photo of him (which I have added to the article). Now I just have to find someone who knows Italian! I still haven't heard from the family, but if you see your student again, you should let her know that I would be happy to send them a copy of the article (or a translation thereof). If they have any other photographs of Rubino or historical documents I would be greatly interested to see them. Kaldari 00:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

One last request: if there's any chance your student could supply the name of Rubino's wife and daughter (as I'm not sure if their in the journal article or not), that would be helpful as well. Cheers! Kaldari 22:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

I'll email you a PDF of my scans. I'm in the process of getting them translated. Might take a few weeks for the translation though. I'm currently talking with an historian in Pittsburg who is working on a book about propaganda by the deed. Obviously Rubino would be a good addition. I would still be quite interested in finding out the name of Rubino's wife and daughter in Britain, although I understand if your student is concerned about protecting her privacy. If you could just make sure that she has my contact info and knows that I'm interested, that would be most appreciated. Cheers. Kaldari (talk) 23:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

I will do. She's only 14 and is a bit wary of emailing strangers. But I have let her know of your interest in Rubino and I will remind her again. I've asked her to chat to her Nan for any info she might recollect. Cheers. Jack1956 (talk) 08:16, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Ah, I understand. I assumed she was a college student. Perhaps she could just pass along my contact info to her parents then. Kaldari (talk) 19:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ripperologists

Concerning your message on my talk page, that's not how things are done here. I am reverting you. You have to learn to follow Wikipedia standards, and there's absolutely nothing about this article... not the name, content, sourcing, etc. ... that follows how things are done here. 71.203.223.65 14:51, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Unfortunately Jack does things his own way - to the detriment of the whole project. I feel sorry for him. 82.109.66.144 13:12, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] G&S

Thanks for all the great contributions, but you don't need to add the "people associated with" category to people who fit into the "G&S performers" category. BTW, Thespis (opera) is up for FA review if you are interested in commenting. Best regards, -- Ssilvers 17:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for joining the G&S project. Current collaborations (besides Thespis) include improving Trial by Jury towards GA class. Best regards, -- Ssilvers 21:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Another idea, if you think you can help, is the Mart Sander article. It sure would be nice if you could help in cleaning this up. I have encountered some resistance in editing this article, as the talk page will note. Best regards, -- Ssilvers 22:02, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Our Thespis (opera) article is currently up for promotion as a WP:Featured Article. Would you kindly review it and contribute any comments that you may have? You can also see the Featured Article discussion at: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Thespis (opera). Best regards, -- Ssilvers 15:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Zoo/Rees/Herbert

Hello, Jack. Marc Shepherd wrote that the auctions took place in 1965, and you write 1966. Where did you get the date? Also, do you have a cite for the remarriage of Herbert's widow? Best regards, -- Ssilvers 23:43, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the messages. Do you mean that you have an actual obituary from 1966, or are you merely saying that Wikipedia articles state (without giving a reliable source) that it was 1966? Because I have not seen anything on Wikipedia that gives a source, whereas both the G&S Archive AND the G&S discography give a date of 1965, also without any citations. I saw another website from a production of The Zoo that says that the auction was at Southeby's in 1865, but that is just a director's note. A mystery? -- Ssilvers 14:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

I have put out some feelers, and I am hoping that someone will get back to me with a good citation either way. Am reading your new Fishe article. -- Ssilvers 16:58, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

I have received several responses now, and everyone agrees that it was 1966. We cite a Times article from 1966, and I suspect that that article gives the info. Also, I have been referred to a G&S Journal cite that I have now added to the articles, and I changed the dates in The Zoo article to 1966, so now all the dates agree. Thanks for catching this! BTW, done with Fishe - I added some refs, images and links and tried to change some of the language so that it is less like the Whowaswho article. -- Ssilvers 23:16, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ivanhoe

Thanks for the cast list. I thought that there were *two* concurrent casts. Do you have the information to list the members of the alternate cast? -- -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:15, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

On Kenningham, can you add more refs? It's not good for an article to rely too heavily on one reference. Best regards, -- -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Good work on Sander: As a result of your decisive action, the article has been much improved! -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:59, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gwynne

Thanks for catching my date typo. I do that all the time!! I really must get my wristwatch checked, because it is about 100 years fast. -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:08, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sander, again

Please keep an eye on the Mart Sander page. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:59, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for helping out with this. Happy editing! -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:52, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm happy to put the fair use summary on the QEII photo, but right now the image summary says that it is a free picture, uploaded by the owner of the copyright, which is better than fair use. So I'm a bit confused. Should I claim fair use even though the photo is a free photo? -- Ssilvers 16:29, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, he says that HE is Mart Sander, the copyright holder, and that he *donates* the image to the public domain. Now he is no longer active on Wikipedia, at least under that username. So, should we make the decision that he is lying? -- Ssilvers 22:51, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)

The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 01:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Prodigal Son (cantata)

Please take a look at this new article. Any comments or improvements are very welcome. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:26, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gwynn

Thanks for adding the refs from the Hyman book. A suggestion: The book should be listed under references at the bottom, and then the ref notes should say <ref> Hyman, p. ___ </ref> and give the page number for each ref. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Brookwood Hospital

Greetings. Thanks for uploading Image:Brookwood hospital 1900.jpg! It really helps bring the article to life. All the best, – Quadell (talk) (random) 16:46, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Mart Sander again

He is back. Please note his response regarding the images. Has he addressed your concern about them? If so, how do we retrieve them? Also, what do you think about the changes to the article? I tried to explain to him about the need for independent citations, but I have no way of reviewing the new reference that he has provided in Estonian - It is not obvious that it supports the fact for which he has cited it. Also, we have long been struggling with how to support his claim that he sang with the Estonian National Opera. I imagine that he was in the chorus - He was rather young at the time, but his own website is not an independent source for this information. Aaargh. -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:50, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Did you see this on the image discussion page?:

Dear everyone, I had no idea every single upload is being discussed to the extremes! So let me present myself: my name is Mart Sander, and I do hold copyright to each of the pictures that I have uploaded. These were made by the photographers who work for me, they have been paid for their work and resultingly I own the copyright. Uploading the pictures I do release them into public domain. If there are any problems, my e-mail is mart@martsander.com. Cheers and merry Christmas, Mart. -- User:Zanderz

Is that Quaddell guy an admin? If not, how about the admin(s) who closed the discussion at the image discussion? Also, should we copy over to the new image summaries the above statement by Zanderz? If you think so, please go ahead and do it. Finally, what about Sanders' new changes (see my question above)? Hope you had a happy holiday. -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:40, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blackmore‎

Happy New Year! Question: Why an article on Blackmore? He hardly seems notable, and it seems you will be forced to rely basically on the WhoWasWho entry, which opens the article up to copyright issues, unless you can find some other sources? Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the reply. All the best. -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Oudin; O'Mara

Done! Feel like returning the favor at Joseph O'Mara? All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

To turn all the refs into proper <ref> format with a description of the article's author, title and date (and page numbers, where relevant), like I did at Oudin's article. But you're right: it's not really that important. Frankly, I'd rather that you dug up more refs for Blackmore, since I still think he's probably not notable (having essentially had an understudy career), and shouldn't have an article - He's certainly of interest to D'OC fans, but as someone like O'Mara shows, Blackmore's career was not notable per WP:NOTE. Since the WhoWasWho website is so excellent, it makes minor members of the D'OC seem to be much more notable than they really are, by giving all the gorey details of their careers there. Just my 2 cents. All the best. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] dyk nom

Well done. OK? Victuallers (talk) 20:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Its not a comment. Press MAIN PAGE. There is a "Did you know" section. The hook above will appear there in about 3-4 days ... OK? Victuallers (talk) 21:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] T:DYK.

Updated DYK query On 4 January 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Walter Dew, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations! · AndonicO Hail! 22:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Checkuser

Just as a friendly heads-up, when you file a checkuser case, it's usually wise to post notification of the case (including a link to the report) on the talkpages of the affected users. That serves multiple purposes: It's a good faith courtesy note, plus it maintains a record in case the information may be needed later, plus other users that are watching that talkpage who may have similar concerns, may be very interested in learning of such a checkuser report. :) FYI, Elonka 06:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Both talkpages, please.  :) --Elonka 17:24, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bengal Sappers & Miners

Hi Jack,

I was pleasantly surprised to find that someone had beaten me to creating a wiki on Bengal sappers & Miners. The battle honours need some work on it. Which was your main reference?

Also, which book, museum, collection did you get the photo of Bengal Sappers from? You need to add this information on the image page.

AshLin (talk) 06:34, 7 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Courtesy note

FYI, your name was mentioned in passing at an extension request that I filed at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Request for extension of restrictions at DreamGuy 2, specifically, my extended report at User:Elonka/DreamGuy report. No action is required on your part, I just wanted to let you know. --Elonka 03:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Whitechapel Murders

I have tried to make sense of the whole thing at The Whitechapel Murders (1888-91) by just listing the facts and not engaging in Ripperologist flights of fancy about who Jack the Ripper was or how many people he killed (the Ripperologist's precious 'canonical five') or whether he leaped into the Thames after the Kelly murder or was committed to an asylum etc etc. The Ripper article is in the process of being replaced by a better one but we agreed on the talk page there that as not all the Whitechapel murders could be ascribed to JTR that a seperate article should deal with the eleven Whitechapel murders listed in the Metropolitan Police file on the case, whether or not they were commited by the legendary Ripper. Tell me what you think. The article is fairly rudimentary at the moment and could be much improved. Colin4C (talk) 17:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

The Jack the Ripper article has now been unlocked. Colin4C (talk) 21:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes, the pictures improve the Whitechapel Murders article. Kb will be pleased...Feel free to improve it in any other way. E.g. I found getting exact dates on the start and finish of the various inquests into the Whitechapel murder victims difficult to obtain. Colin4C (talk) 10:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Suspected DreamGuy sockpuppet

Hi there. You said "If I'm correct it is at least a violation of code B." If this is right, then it shouldn't be too hard to make the request. Just set up the request like last time, but you need to include a link to the ArbCom remedy in question, and then a link to the actual edits, or a few of them if it's a lot, (in diff form) that would be a violation of that remedy if it is indeed DreamGuy that made those edits. Finally, a short explanation in words as to why you suspect it is a sockpuppet (how is the behavior similar?) would be nice. I'm not too picky about format, just that there is actual hard evidence provided. Thanks. :-) Dmcdevit·t 02:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, saw the new request, and recommend a couple formatting tweaks:
  • Move the new request to the top of the page, above the archive line
  • As Dmcdevit said above, be sure to include a link to the ArbCom page
  • Try to give a couple specific diffs that say, "Look what the sockpuppet did," and "see how this is similar to what DreamGuy did." Just editing the same pages isn't necessarily proof.
Good luck, Elonka 21:22, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
(reply)
Basically, you need to write a report from the assumption that whichever clerk is reviewing the report, that they may have never heard of DreamGuy in their lives, have no idea who's in the right or wrong, and have no idea that there was ever any kind of ArbCom case. So you have to spoonfeed them.  :) --Elonka 21:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Much better!  :) Also, please be sure to post a notice at all of the affected users' talkpages (including DreamGuy), informing them about the report. --Elonka 22:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Was he actually editing under the anon whilst blocked? - Arcayne (cast a spell) 17:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
No, I had read that he was editing under an anon while blocked. I was asking for confirmation of that. I am not contending that. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 00:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
I would suggest that you elevate the issue to the ArbCom Enforcement area, as DG is under their purview. Dmcdevit has intervened on at least two prior occasions to save DreamGuy's bacon. He past behavior indicates that he cannot be relied upon to act neutrally in this matter. As Elonka crafted the last matter which resulted in his block, you certainly should confer with her or with DickLyon. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 20:56, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
FYI, I just noticed that the IP was blocked, so this may all be a non-issue at this point: [1] --Elonka 19:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
I suspect this might become less of a problem now. He has been prohibited from editing from anything other than a single account. What remains to be seen is if DreamGuy will use the eponymous account or a brand new one that he specifies. Either way, I think he will be editing more honestly from now on. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 18:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Whitechapel Murders

I've restored the article. Yes its almost certainly DG. He's made an edit on the Ripper page as well. Its deja vu time all over again...Colin4C (talk) 21:53, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Repairing or adding?

Are you adding new additions or having to repair from where DG has been busy? I've just found your Walter Dew article...are you protecting the page with Twinkle? I hope those are new additions and that you aren't having to repair the article...Cheers, Berean Hunter (talk) 23:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment that you left on my talk page. I appreciate it. My edits are very few & far between these days. You've been quite the busy bee from the look of your talk page. Good work! Berean Hunter (talk) 23:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Milhist coordinators election has started

The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates. Please vote here by February 28. --ROGER DAVIES talk 23:24, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hulme photo

LOL! He doesn't look much like that today! -- Ssilvers (talk) 13:45, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit]  :Image:Davidhulme.jpg

Had you considered uploading to Wikimedia Commons so other projects can make use of your images? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:40, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ethel Le Neve

You are not an admin. Please do not delete my article until I have finished it and then nominate it in the usual manner. If you do it again I will report your incivility. Jack1956 (talk) 17:25, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure you are aware of it, but 1) you aren't an admin either, 2) admins aren't in charge of content, 3) you don't just get to say you aren't done with something and demand nobody else touch it, 4) you don't have to nominate something for deletion if it's a redirect to an article that already fully covers a topic, 5) your comments about you supposedly knowing Wikipedia policy and so forth and that you demand I not do things are highly incivil, 6) false reports for revenge purposes don't get you anywhere.
In addition, you are banned from posting to my talk page thanks to continuing example that you are not here to follow the Wikipedia policies but instead that you hope to get your own way through bullying and threats. DreamGuy (talk) 19:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Sure, post a number of extremely inaccurate info on another user's talk page before failing to demonstrate anything approaching courage and maturity by banning any response? Not bloody likely, sport. If he says he's working on the article, do show a modicum of good sense and good faith by allowing him to finish the thing before you blind revert it.
You keep talking about how everyone else seems to not be following wiki rules and policies. Since we are all wrong, and you are right, perhaps you would be happier elsewhere. And no, since i don't get to post on your page, you don't get to respond on mine. Disregard my request at your peril. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 19:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Every edit anyone makes here includes the line that they accept that other people can and will edit their work. You and Jack1956 seem to want to insist that you are above this basic concept of how Wikipedia works, while all the time making threats and personal attacks. DreamGuy (talk) 20:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Yes, yes, yes. You are right and we are all wrong. Its the same song and dance you've used since 2005. Get new material, would you? - Arcayne (cast a spell) 20:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Gennaro Rubino (cont.)

I just emailed a PDF of the original Italian article as well as a PDF of the translated English version to you. Let me know if there are any problems receiving them. Cheers! Kaldari (talk) 21:50, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] JtR image

Oops, that was a piker mistake of me. Guess I was editing with too many other things on my plate. So, DG's comment was entirely devoid of any useful information? Especially when he has been asked to not post to my talk page. Apparently, the banning form posting on each other's talk pages only applies to him. Sad.
Btw, thank for supplying the image. Credit where credit is due. Do you know the free/fair use status status of the image? - Arcayne (cast a spell) 14:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

If by "utterly devoid of any useful information" he means gave him the very important info that it was not Jack the Ripper in the image and that it was about the Vigilance Committee... but apparently Arcayne is up to his old tricks of ignoring anything anyone with any actual knowledge on the topic has to say. DreamGuy (talk) 14:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Actually, it was something more closely approximating not rewarding bad behavior, Dreamguy. Parenting works much the same way; you don't pay attention to the kid throwing the tantrum, instead waiting until they find socially-acceptable methods of interaction. Jack, thanks for the licensing information. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 17:09, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Real G-Unit BarnStar!

The Fraternity/Sorority Barnstar
For being apart of WikiProject Freemasonry! InvisibleDiplomat666 05:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Signor Brocolini

I added this new article. Any comments/changes welcome. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:06, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for looking it over. When I found that article about Brocolini and baseball, I knew I could put together a good WP entry. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:39, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] List of Freemasons

Jack, you recently added actor Harry Corbett to the above article. I thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately the inclusion criteria for adding someone to that list is quite strict. We insist on having reliable sources cited at the time of inclusion. Simply listing the lodge name and number does not qualify as a reliable source. I have therefor removed your addition. Please feel free to return Mr. Corbett to the list - with a reliable source cited to verify that he is indeed a Mason. If you have questions, please contact me. Thanks. Blueboar (talk) 00:41, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Several of the sites you provided to me fit our criteria ... Pick whichever one you think is the most reliable and re-add Bro. Corbett to the list. And thanks for understanding. Blueboar (talk) 17:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] John Edmunds

Sorry, I don't, but as the comment has been removed the point is moot now. Dreamspy (talk) 19:05, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vigilance Committee image

Go ahead and upload the image to Wikipedia, Jack - you've worked hard enough in finding and identifying it, so you should get the enduring credit for uploading it. I'll check it later for any possible licensing issues that might crop up. For now, connect it only to the article discussion (perhaps replacing the same image there) until we get a consensus on switching the image. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 17:56, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Whitechapel Murder Victims

Hi Jack. Just advert to the fact that a lot of the separate articles on the Whitechapel murder victims in the wikipedia are very shoddy indeed. My guess is that those who have tried to improve them in the past four years get attacked by a mystery assailant and expire whilst waiting for the impotent guardians of law and order to arrive on the scene, thus leaving said articles in said shoddy state. I am attempting to make some (slow) improvements... Colin4C (talk) 10:09, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of The Jesus Scroll

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Jesus Scroll, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jesus Scroll. Thank you. MSJapan (talk) 05:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Donovan Joyce

An article that you have been involved in editing, Donovan Joyce, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donovan Joyce. Thank you. MSJapan (talk) 05:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dorset Street

Dorset Street used to have a wikipedia entry but some editors had it deleted as 'non-notable' whilst my back was turned...I recently created Flower and Dean Street which nobody seems to have noticed yet. In the past some wicked editors attempted to have my Wormwood Street deleted but fortunately I was informed about this and managed to save it in time. Some editors have odd ideas about notability, judging what is notable by the criterion of their own ignorance about the subject. As the potential wikipedia editor Al Capone said "I don't even know what street Canada is on". Colin4C (talk) 17:14, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Updated DYK query On 5 April 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dorset Street, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Daniel Case (talk) 04:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Conroy-Ward

Thanks for the star! Didn't Conroy-Ward play a role in the 1975 cententary season Utopia and the concert of GD? It's not mentioned in the DOC Picture History. Maybe he only did the recording. Do you have any references on it? -- Ssilvers (talk) 13:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again - even better! I was able to find a reference for Conroy-Ward playing in Utopia, but I'm not sure about GD. Let me know if you find your reference. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:50, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:6drflyer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:6drflyer.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:37, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nantlais Williams

Yes Nantlais Williams was the father of Rev Prof Rheinallt Nantlais Williams who was the father of Prof. Stephen Nantlais Williams (who now teaches at Union Theological Seminary, Northern Ireland). Sorry for not getting back to you until now. Rheinallt Nantlais Williams's wife (and Stephen's mum) is still alive and lives in Aberystwyth. Did Rheinallt teach you, i hear he was dab hand at Philosophy of Religion? Rhys Llwyd http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rhys_Llwyd —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhys Llwyd (talkcontribs) 21:38, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Christianity

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity

The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

- Tinucherian (talk) 14:18, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

Hello Jack1956! Welcome to Wikiproject Christianity! Thank you for joining. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - Tinucherian (talk) 03:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Getting Started
Useful Links
Miscellaneous
Work Groups
Projects
Similar WikiProjects

[edit] G&S

The Gilbert and Sullivan Barnstar
For your significant contribution to creating new articles on the performers of Gilbert and Sullivan I award you this barnstar. Dreamspy (talk) 21:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Arthur-english.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Arthur-english.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --14:59, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Walter Dew Later years

Hi Jack,

I just wanted to double check this spelling for Walter Dew's last address...Wee Hoose? ..and not Wee House? I am following through your articles and enjoying them. Thank you for posting the photos as well...⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 19:17, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


[edit] May 2008

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Awarded to Jack1956 for his amazing contribution to Wikipedia on May 16 2008. Pemberton08 (talk) 09:29, 17 May 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ArthurEnglish.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:ArthurEnglish.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Historyplay.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Historyplay.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:57, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Christianity Newsletter