Talk:Jackson Browne

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.
More information about this article... The following comments have been left for this page: I'm a fan of Jackson Browne as much as the author of this entry, but still I was surprised at the degree of subjectivity in the article. Adjectives such as "sublime", "best", and the like do not belong in an impartial biography. While I appreciate the discographical information, I do hope for a revision of this to eliminate the subjectivity.At78rpm 02:13, 31 March 2007 (UTC) (edit)

I noticed that one user changed his birthdate from 1948 to 1950. I changed it back to 1948 because that's the date listed at www.imdb.com. --MechanicallySeparatedChicken 22:06, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Picture?

That one looks ridiculous and doesn't convey spirit at all. WHY?

Yes, it is truly dreadful. That's the Wikipedia way (no fair use photos of living people). Wasted Time R 02:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Ugh, I just came here to say pretty much the same thing. The current one came from flickr; hopefully, we can find a more recent one from there... EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Hung up on looks are we? Frankly, I think it's an ok photo. It represents how the dude looks/looked in 1988. What do you expect, some studio photo of the guy somehow "rocking out"? Or with some sort of period or milieu clothing?--81.152.253.176 14:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

I posted a newer picture of him. This one is better than the others. --Daysleeper47 (talk) 14:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Abuse Allegations

I removed the statement that all domestic abuse allegations against Jackson Browne relating to Daryll Hannah have been "proven false". The citation reference it gave was to what I saw as an unreliable personal page that lacked objectivity or any new primary information. I really dont see why any domestic abuse allegations are integral to his wikipedia article regardless. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prattjon (talk • contribs) 04:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)